up_reraStatus: Completed
CASE ID: 0901126027012024

Appellant / Complainant

Vasudeo Bihari Sharan

VS

Respondent

U.P. Awas Evam Vikas Parishad

Disposal Award

Appellant

TathyaGrid Legal Copilot: Automated procedural intelligence extracted from official RERA tribunal records.
Analyze in Workspace

Legal Issues & Claims Raised

Delay in PossessionDelay Compensation / InterestJurisdiction & Maintainability

Case Procedural History & Progression Tree

Visual step-by-step tree detailing dispute origin, interim hearings, and final tribunal ruling.

20 Milestones
Filing Phase

Complaint Filing & Dispute Registration

Complaint registered under Case ID 0901126027012024 by Vasudeo Bihari Sharan against U.P. Awas Evam Vikas Parishad before up_rera.

Delay in PossessionDelay Compensation / InterestJurisdiction & Maintainability
2
Stage 129/08/2025

for delivery of Judgment/Order

The Tribunal quashed the Regulatory Authority's orders that had rejected complaints on limitation grounds, ruling that the Limitation Act does not apply to RERA proceedings and that promoters cannot evade statutory interest obligations by citing delay or the execution of conveyance deeds.

3
Stage 223/04/2025

Further Hearing

The Tribunal has heard the arguments from the counsels for the appellant and respondents and has reserved its judgment.

4
Stage 321/04/2025

Further Hearing

No text available.

5
Stage 411/04/2025

Delay condonation

The Tribunal has adjourned the ongoing arguments in Appeal-221/2024 and scheduled the matter for further hearing on April 21, 2025.

6
Stage 509/04/2025

Delay condonation

The Tribunal has adjourned the appeal to 11.04.2025 at 10:30 a.m. following a joint request from the counsel for both parties.

7
Stage 608/04/2025

Further Hearing

The Tribunal refers to a previous order passed in a related appeal (Jitendra Kumar Shukla Vs. U.P. Avas Evam Vikas Parishad) for the orders in the current matter.

8
Stage 727/03/2025

Further Hearing

The Tribunal has adjourned the matter to 08.04.2025 at 1:30 PM following a joint request from both parties.

9
Stage 820/03/2025

Admission

The Tribunal heard arguments from the appellant's counsel, the amicus curiae, and the Regulatory Authority, and subsequently scheduled the appeal for further hearing on March 27, 2025.

10
Stage 910/03/2025

Admission

The Tribunal has adjourned the appeal to 20.03.2025 for orders/hearing upon the request of the respondent's counsel.

11
Stage 1020/02/2025

Admission

The Tribunal granted an adjournment due to the respondent's counsel's illness and rescheduled the hearing for March 10, 2025.

12
Stage 1128/01/2025

Admission

The Tribunal noted the arguments regarding the applicability of the Limitation Act to the RERA Act and adjourned the matter to 20.02.2025 for further hearing.

13
Stage 1208/01/2025

Admission

The Tribunal granted the respondent 10 days to file objections to the application for condonation of delay and the grounds of appeal, with a subsequent timeline for the appellant to file a reply.

14
Stage 1323/11/2024

Admission

The Tribunal granted the respondent 10 days to file objections to the appeal and directed the matter to be listed for hearing on 08.01.2025.

15
Stage 1428/10/2024

Admission

No text available.

16
Stage 1519/09/2024

Admission

The Tribunal granted the respondent 7 days to file objections, after which the applicant is permitted one week to file a reply. The matter is scheduled for orders on 28.10.2024.

17
Stage 1616/08/2024

Admission

No text available.

18
Stage 1718/07/2024

Defect Removal

The Tribunal verified that the appeal is within the limitation period and directed the issuance of notice to the respondent, setting a hearing date for 16.08.2024.

19
Stage 18Final Ruling Order

Tribunal Order #0901126027012024-29-08-2025

The Tribunal quashed the Regulatory Authority's orders that had rejected complaints on limitation grounds, ruling that the Limitation Act does not apply to RERA proceedings and that promoters cannot evade statutory interest obligations by citing delay or the execution of conveyance deeds.

Disposal Phase

Tribunal Disposal & Final Award Ruling

The Tribunal quashed the Regulatory Authority's orders that had rejected complaints on limitation grounds, ruling that the Limitation Act does not apply to RERA proceedings and that promoters cannot evade statutory interest obligations by citing delay or the execution of conveyance deeds. Awarded in favor of Appellant.

Disposal Winner: AppellantStatus: Completed

Final Tribunal Order & Ruling Verdict Summary

Official Ruling Summary

The Tribunal quashed the Regulatory Authority's orders that had rejected complaints on limitation grounds, ruling that the Limitation Act does not apply to RERA proceedings and that promoters cannot evade statutory interest obligations by citing delay or the execution of conveyance deeds.

Ruling Awarded To

Appellant

Interest Period

from the date of allotment/agreement till the date of offer of possession

Verified Tribunal DocumentationDownload Official Final Tribunal Order PDF

Statutory Sections Cited (RERA Act 2016)

Section 18(1)Section 3Section 79

Appearing Legal Counsel & Advocates

Appellant Advocate(s)

  • Amit Yadav

Respondent Advocate(s)

  • Saurabh Misra
  • Gautam Johri

Official RERA Tribunal Orders (1)

FINAL_ORDEROrder ID: 0901126027012024-29-08-2025

The Tribunal quashed the Regulatory Authority's orders that had rejected complaints on limitation grounds, ruling that the Limitation Act does not apply to RERA proceedings and that promoters cannot evade statutory interest obligations by citing delay or the execution of conveyance deeds.

TathyaGrid RERA Intelligence AI

Need to research all rulings for a builder?

Extract builder dossiers, check execution status, and draft RERA appeal petitions in minutes using TathyaGrid.

Open AI Workspace →