Appellant / Complainant
Vinod Kumar Singh
Respondent
Air Force Naval Housing Board
₹21,93,694
Appellant
Legal Issues & Claims Raised
Case Procedural History & Progression Tree
Visual step-by-step tree detailing dispute origin, interim hearings, and final tribunal ruling.
Complaint Filing & Dispute Registration
Complaint registered under Case ID 0901126026282022 by Vinod Kumar Singh against Air Force Naval Housing Board before up_rera.
Final Hearing
The Tribunal set aside the Regulatory Authority's orders because they erroneously granted possession instead of the refund specifically prayed for by the appellant, and remanded the matter back for a fresh decision on its merits.
Final Hearing
The Tribunal has ordered the matter to be listed for hearing tomorrow, 13.02.2024.
Final Hearing
The Tribunal has adjourned the appeal and ordered it to be listed for hearing on 12.02.2024 along with other similar matters.
Final Hearing
The tribunal adjourned the proceedings upon the request of the respondent's counsel and rescheduled the hearing for July 10, 2023, with the consent of both parties.
Final Hearing
The Tribunal adjourned the matter due to lack of time and rescheduled the hearing for July 5, 2023.
For Order
The Tribunal noted the absence of the Respondent and directed them to appear on the next date, while also instructing both counsels to be present at the next hearing scheduled for 05.12.2022.
For Order
The Tribunal granted an adjournment request filed by the appellant's counsel and rescheduled the hearing for November 16, 2022.
For Order
The Tribunal examined the appellant's prayer for a refund with interest versus the respondent's claim that possession was sought, noting the respondent's willingness to refund the principal amount without interest; the matter is adjourned for further orders.
For Order
The Tribunal directed the appellant to file a replication/rejoinder and serve a copy to the respondent via email before the next hearing scheduled for 19.09.2022.
Hearing on Appeal
The Tribunal directed the respondent to file their Vakalatnama and reply to the grounds of appeal within one week and scheduled the matter for further orders on 23.08.2022.
Hearing on Appeal
The Tribunal issued a notice to the respondent and directed the appellant to serve the appeal via speed-post and email, scheduling the next hearing for July 12, 2022.
Tribunal Order #0901126026282022-19-09-2022
The Tribunal examined the appellant's prayer for a refund with interest versus the respondent's claim that possession was sought, noting the respondent's willingness to refund the principal amount without interest; the matter is adjourned for further orders.
Tribunal Order #0901126026282022-13-02-2024
The Tribunal set aside the Regulatory Authority's orders because they erroneously granted possession instead of the refund specifically prayed for by the appellant, and remanded the matter back for a fresh decision on its merits.
Tribunal Disposal & Final Award Ruling
The Tribunal set aside the Regulatory Authority's orders because they erroneously granted possession instead of the refund specifically prayed for by the appellant, and remanded the matter back for a fresh decision on its merits. Awarded in favor of Appellant.
Final Tribunal Order & Ruling Verdict Summary
Official Ruling Summary
The Tribunal set aside the Regulatory Authority's orders because they erroneously granted possession instead of the refund specifically prayed for by the appellant, and remanded the matter back for a fresh decision on its merits.
Ruling Awarded To
Appellant
Statutory Sections Cited (RERA Act 2016)
Appearing Legal Counsel & Advocates
Appellant Advocate(s)
- Rakesh Kumar Rana
Respondent Advocate(s)
- Kushagra Dikshit
- Nilaya Gupta
Official RERA Tribunal Orders (2)
The Tribunal examined the appellant's prayer for a refund with interest versus the respondent's claim that possession was sought, noting the respondent's willingness to refund the principal amount without interest; the matter is adjourned for further orders.
The Tribunal set aside the Regulatory Authority's orders because they erroneously granted possession instead of the refund specifically prayed for by the appellant, and remanded the matter back for a fresh decision on its merits.
Need to research all rulings for a builder?
Extract builder dossiers, check execution status, and draft RERA appeal petitions in minutes using TathyaGrid.