Appellant / Complainant
Naresh Chandra Bali
Respondent
Super Tech Limited
super tech limited
Unknown
Case Procedural History & Progression Tree
Visual step-by-step tree detailing dispute origin, interim hearings, and final tribunal ruling.
Complaint Filing & Dispute Registration
Complaint registered under Case ID 0901126025812021 by Naresh Chandra Bali against Super Tech Limited before up_rera.
Delay condonation
The Tribunal decided to keep the appeal in abeyance because a moratorium has been declared against the respondent company, M/s Supertech Limited, under Section 14 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016.
Delay condonation
The Tribunal adjourned the matter to 19.05.2022 upon a joint request from both parties and directed the respondent's counsel to place the NCLT order on record.
Delay condonation
The Tribunal directed the respondent to file the NCLT order regarding the declared moratorium and the appointment of an IRP before further orders can be passed, adjourning the matter to 11.05.2022.
Delay condonation
This document appears to be a formal header/caption of an appeal before the U.P. Real Estate Appellate Tribunal, noting the presence of counsel and members, but it does not contain any substantive rulings or directives.
Delay condonation
The Tribunal granted the respondent 10 days to file objections to the condonation of delay application and grounds of appeal, scheduling the next hearing for March 30, 2022.
Delay condonation
The Tribunal directed the respondent's counsel to file a Vakalatnama and an objection to the limitation application within 10 days, scheduling the matter for January 31, 2022.
Defect Removal
The Tribunal noted a procedural error in the application for condonation of delay and directed the appellant to refile it under the correct section (Section 44(2) of the Act, 2016) within 10 days.
Tribunal Order #0901126025812021-19-05-2022
The Tribunal decided to keep the appeal in abeyance because a moratorium has been declared against the respondent company, M/s Supertech Limited, under Section 14 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016.
Tribunal Disposal & Final Award Ruling
The Tribunal decided to keep the appeal in abeyance because a moratorium has been declared against the respondent company, M/s Supertech Limited, under Section 14 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016. Awarded in favor of Unknown.
Final Tribunal Order & Ruling Verdict Summary
Official Ruling Summary
The Tribunal decided to keep the appeal in abeyance because a moratorium has been declared against the respondent company, M/s Supertech Limited, under Section 14 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016.
Ruling Awarded To
Unknown
Appearing Legal Counsel & Advocates
Appellant Advocate(s)
- Rajeev Kumar Singh
Respondent Advocate(s)
- | Counsel for Appellant RAJEEV KUMAR SINGH | |
Official RERA Tribunal Orders (1)
The Tribunal decided to keep the appeal in abeyance because a moratorium has been declared against the respondent company, M/s Supertech Limited, under Section 14 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016.
Need to research all rulings for super tech limited?
Extract builder dossiers, check execution status, and draft RERA appeal petitions in minutes using TathyaGrid.