Appellant / Complainant
Pashupati Nath Gupta
Respondent
Uttar Pradesh Real Estate Regulatory Authority, Excella Infrazone LLP
excella infrazone llp
₹14,59,398
Respondent
Legal Issues & Claims Raised
Case Procedural History & Progression Tree
Visual step-by-step tree detailing dispute origin, interim hearings, and final tribunal ruling.
Complaint Filing & Dispute Registration
Complaint registered under Case ID 0901126025242022 by Pashupati Nath Gupta against Uttar Pradesh Real Estate Regulatory Authority, Excella Infrazone LLP before up_rera.
Final Hearing
The U.P. Real Estate Appellate Tribunal dismissed the appeal, upholding the Regulatory Authority's decision to allow the promoter to refund the appellant's deposit after deducting earnest money due to the appellant's financial default and subsequent cancellation of the unit.
Final Hearing
The Tribunal granted a request to list the appeal for orders or hearing on 26.11.2025, noting that no further adjournments will be permitted.
For Order
The Tribunal adjourned the appeal for a final hearing on 07.11.2025 at the request of the respondent's counsel, noting that no further adjournments will be granted.
For Order
The Tribunal has adjourned the appeal to 14.10.2025 following a joint request from the counsel for both parties.
For Order
The Tribunal granted the respondent's counsel additional time to prepare the brief and adjourned the appeal to 07.10.2025.
For Order
The appellant's counsel requested an adjournment, and the Tribunal has rescheduled the appeal for orders on 17.09.2025.
For Order
The Tribunal granted an adjournment application filed by the respondent's counsel and rescheduled the appeal for hearing on 01.09.2025.
For Order
The Tribunal granted an adjournment application filed by the appellant's counsel and rescheduled the appeal for hearing/orders on 31.07.2025.
For Order
The Tribunal directed the Registry to submit a report regarding the uploaded certified copy of the impugned order and scheduled the appeal for orders on 10.07.2025.
for deposition of cost & hearing
The Tribunal granted a request by the appellant's counsel to list the case for orders on 16.05.2025.
for deposition of cost & hearing
Upon the request of the learned counsel for both parties, the tribunal has adjourned the appeal and scheduled it for a hearing on 29.04.2025.
for deposition of cost & hearing
The Tribunal has adjourned the appeal to 02.04.2025 upon the joint request of the parties and directed that pleadings be completed in the interim.
for deposition of cost & hearing
The Tribunal has rescheduled the appeal for orders or hearing to 19.02.2025 following a joint request from both parties.
for deposition of cost & hearing
The Tribunal issued a notice to the respondent and scheduled the next hearing for the appeal on February 5, 2025.
Hearing
The Tribunal heard arguments from the counsel for both parties and reserved the judgment for a later date.
Hearing
The Tribunal denied the appellant's request for adjournment due to illness and scheduled the appeal for hearing on 30.07.2029, directing the appellant to ensure representation on that date.
Hearing
The Tribunal granted an adjournment requested by the appellant's counsel and scheduled the appeal for hearing on 29.07.2024, noting that no further adjournments will be permitted.
Hearing
The Tribunal granted an adjournment requested by the appellant's counsel due to his absence from the station and rescheduled the hearing for 23.07.2024, noting that no further adjournments will be permitted on the next date.
Hearing
The Tribunal has adjourned the appeal to 23.05.2024 following a joint request from the counsel for both parties.
Hearing
The Tribunal has rescheduled the hearing of the defective appeal to 23.04.2024 following a joint request from the counsel for both parties.
Hearing
The Tribunal granted an adjournment to the appellant on health grounds but closed their opportunity to file a reply to the respondent's objections due to previous delays.
Hearing
The Tribunal granted a request for adjournment due to the appellant's counsel's health and provided 10 days for the appellant to file a reply to the respondent's objection, scheduling the next hearing for 29.02.2024.
Hearing
The Tribunal adjourned the proceedings due to a call for lawyers to abstain from judicial work by the Bar Council of Uttar Pradesh and rescheduled the hearing for 17.10.2023.
Hearing
The Tribunal adjourned the proceedings due to the illness of the appellant's counsel and directed the parties to exchange pleadings before the next hearing on 11.09.2023.
Hearing
The Tribunal granted an adjournment requested by the appellant's counsel due to illness and rescheduled the matter for hearing on 09.05.2023.
Hearing
The Tribunal granted the appellant a final 10-day extension to file a reply to the respondent's objections and scheduled the matter for orders on 28.03.2023.
Hearing
The Tribunal granted a one-week extension to the appellant's counsel to file a reply to the respondent's objections and directed the submission of the reply via email and the e-portal.
Hearing
The Tribunal granted the appellant one week to file a reply to the respondent's objections and directed the submission of the reply via email and the e-portal, adjourning the matter to 19.12.2022.
Hearing
The Tribunal granted an adjournment requested by the appellant's counsel for medical reasons and directed the respondent to rectify a defective Vakalatnama and serve the written statement to the appellant.
Hearing
The appeal was dismissed for want of prosecution due to the non-appearance of the appellant's counsel.
Notice
The Tribunal granted the respondent one week to file objections to the grounds of appeal and directed the parties to exchange copies via email and upload them to the e-portal before the next hearing on 08.08.2022.
Defect Removal
The Tribunal condoned the 72-day delay in filing the appeal based on the Supreme Court's Suo Motu Writ Petition (Civil) No. 3 of 2020 and directed the Registry to convert the defective appeal into a regular appeal and issue notice to the respondent.
Tribunal Order #0901126025242022-29-02-2024
The Tribunal granted an adjournment to the appellant on health grounds but closed their opportunity to file a reply to the respondent's objections due to previous delays.
Tribunal Order #0901126025242022-26-11-2025
The U.P. Real Estate Appellate Tribunal dismissed the appeal, upholding the Regulatory Authority's decision to allow the promoter to refund the appellant's deposit after deducting earnest money due to the appellant's financial default and subsequent cancellation of the unit.
Tribunal Order #0901126025242022-18-05-2022
The Tribunal condoned the 72-day delay in filing the appeal based on the Supreme Court's Suo Motu Writ Petition (Civil) No. 3 of 2020 and directed the Registry to convert the defective appeal into a regular appeal and issue notice to the respondent.
Tribunal Disposal & Final Award Ruling
The U.P. Real Estate Appellate Tribunal dismissed the appeal, upholding the Regulatory Authority's decision to allow the promoter to refund the appellant's deposit after deducting earnest money due to the appellant's financial default and subsequent cancellation of the unit. Awarded in favor of Respondent.
Final Tribunal Order & Ruling Verdict Summary
Official Ruling Summary
The U.P. Real Estate Appellate Tribunal dismissed the appeal, upholding the Regulatory Authority's decision to allow the promoter to refund the appellant's deposit after deducting earnest money due to the appellant's financial default and subsequent cancellation of the unit.
Ruling Awarded To
Respondent
Statutory Sections Cited (RERA Act 2016)
Appearing Legal Counsel & Advocates
Appellant Advocate(s)
- Saghar Mehdi
Respondent Advocate(s)
- Saurabh Misra
- Praneti Agarwal
Official RERA Tribunal Orders (3)
The Tribunal granted an adjournment to the appellant on health grounds but closed their opportunity to file a reply to the respondent's objections due to previous delays.
The U.P. Real Estate Appellate Tribunal dismissed the appeal, upholding the Regulatory Authority's decision to allow the promoter to refund the appellant's deposit after deducting earnest money due to the appellant's financial default and subsequent cancellation of the unit.
The Tribunal condoned the 72-day delay in filing the appeal based on the Supreme Court's Suo Motu Writ Petition (Civil) No. 3 of 2020 and directed the Registry to convert the defective appeal into a regular appeal and issue notice to the respondent.
Need to research all rulings for excella infrazone llp?
Extract builder dossiers, check execution status, and draft RERA appeal petitions in minutes using TathyaGrid.