Appellant / Complainant
Sunita Mangal
Respondent
Omaxe Limited
omaxe limited
₹16,40,001
Respondent
Legal Issues & Claims Raised
Case Procedural History & Progression Tree
Visual step-by-step tree detailing dispute origin, interim hearings, and final tribunal ruling.
Complaint Filing & Dispute Registration
Complaint registered under Case ID 0901126025112022 by Sunita Mangal against Omaxe Limited before up_rera.
Delay condonation
The Tribunal dismissed the appeals, ruling that claims for 'assured return' or commercial interest payments fall outside the scope of the Real Estate (Regulation and Development) Act 2016, as such arrangements are independent commercial agreements rather than consumer protection matters.
For Order
The Tribunal granted a request for adjournment from both parties and rescheduled the appeal for hearing on 06.03.2025.
For Order
The Tribunal granted an adjournment requested by the appellant's counsel and scheduled the case for orders on 12.02.2025.
For Order
The Tribunal noted the absence of the appellant's counsel and adjourned the matter to 27.01.2025 for orders/hearing, directing the Registry to inform the appellant of the next date.
For Order
The Tribunal allowed the appellant's applications to take replies and documents on record and subsequently reserved judgment after hearing arguments from both parties.
For Order
The Tribunal granted the respondent three days to file objections to documents uploaded by the appellant and scheduled the appeal for a final hearing on 30.08.2024.
For Order
The Tribunal granted an adjournment requested by the appellant's counsel and scheduled the hearing for the application for condonation of delay on 30.07.2024.
For Order
The Tribunal granted an adjournment requested by the appellant's counsel to study the respondent's objections regarding the maintainability of the complaint and listed the matter for hearing on 30.04.2024.
For Order
The Tribunal granted an adjournment requested by the appellant's counsel and scheduled the defective appeal for a hearing on 28.03.2024.
For Order
The Tribunal noted the absence of the applicant's counsel and scheduled the appeal for further orders on 22.02.2024.
For Order
The order records that no parties were present during the hearing on 25.08.2023.
For Order
The Tribunal closed the appellant's opportunity to file a reply to the respondent's objection due to non-compliance with a previously granted timeline and scheduled the matter for hearing on 25.08.2023.
For Order
The Tribunal granted the appellant 10 days to file a reply to the respondent's objections and scheduled the matter for orders on July 7, 2023.
For Order
On the joint request of the counsels for both parties, the tribunal adjourned the appeal to 05.12.2022 for further orders.
For Order
The Tribunal directed the appellant's counsel to appear in proper dress and to file a replication/rejoinder against the respondent's reply before the next hearing on 09.11.2022.
Further Order
The Tribunal noted that notice had been served on the respondent and scheduled the case for further orders on 09.09.2022.
Hearing
The Tribunal issued a notice to the respondent and directed the appellant to serve the memo of appeal via speed-post and email, scheduling the next hearing for August 10, 2022.
Hearing
The Tribunal granted an adjournment request made by the respondent's counsel due to their unavailability and rescheduled the hearing for 13.07.2022.
Defect Removal
The Tribunal ruled that there was no delay in filing the appeal and directed the Registry to convert the defective appeal into a regular appeal, subsequently adjourning the matter to 11.07.2022.
Defect Removal
The Tribunal granted the appellant's counsel one week to upload the application for condonation of delay and rescheduled the matter for July 8, 2022.
Tribunal Order #0901126025112022-06-03-2025
The Tribunal dismissed the appeals, ruling that claims for 'assured return' or commercial interest payments fall outside the scope of the Real Estate (Regulation and Development) Act 2016, as such arrangements are independent commercial agreements rather than consumer protection matters.
Tribunal Disposal & Final Award Ruling
The Tribunal dismissed the appeals, ruling that claims for 'assured return' or commercial interest payments fall outside the scope of the Real Estate (Regulation and Development) Act 2016, as such arrangements are independent commercial agreements rather than consumer protection matters. Awarded in favor of Respondent.
Final Tribunal Order & Ruling Verdict Summary
Official Ruling Summary
The Tribunal dismissed the appeals, ruling that claims for 'assured return' or commercial interest payments fall outside the scope of the Real Estate (Regulation and Development) Act 2016, as such arrangements are independent commercial agreements rather than consumer protection matters.
Ruling Awarded To
Respondent
Statutory Sections Cited (RERA Act 2016)
Appearing Legal Counsel & Advocates
Appellant Advocate(s)
- Nirankar Singh
Respondent Advocate(s)
- V K S Bisen
Official RERA Tribunal Orders (1)
The Tribunal dismissed the appeals, ruling that claims for 'assured return' or commercial interest payments fall outside the scope of the Real Estate (Regulation and Development) Act 2016, as such arrangements are independent commercial agreements rather than consumer protection matters.
Need to research all rulings for omaxe limited?
Extract builder dossiers, check execution status, and draft RERA appeal petitions in minutes using TathyaGrid.