Appellant / Complainant
Satyajeet Bhattacharya, Lalima Bhattacharya
Respondent
Super Realtech Pvt. Ltd.
super realtech pvt. ltd.
Respondent
Legal Issues & Claims Raised
Case Procedural History & Progression Tree
Visual step-by-step tree detailing dispute origin, interim hearings, and final tribunal ruling.
Complaint Filing & Dispute Registration
Complaint registered under Case ID 0901126024972021 by Satyajeet Bhattacharya, Lalima Bhattacharya against Super Realtech Pvt. Ltd. before up_rera.
Delay condonation
The Tribunal dismissed the appeal as not maintainable because the project was not registered with RERA and, pursuant to Supreme Court precedent, the Act's provisions do not apply to projects completed or largely possessed prior to its promulgation.
Delay condonation
The Tribunal granted an adjournment requested by the Appellant's counsel due to the unavailability of his senior and scheduled the matter for the following day to consider the application for condonation of delay.
For Order
The Tribunal granted the appellant one week to file a reply to the respondent's objections and directed the service of the reply via email and e-portal, scheduling the matter for May 30, 2022.
For Order
The Tribunal noted the progress regarding the amendment of Form-L and the filing of objections, subsequently scheduling the matter for 19.05.2022 to consider the application for condonation of delay.
Further Order
The Tribunal directed the respondent to file objections and serve them to the applicant via email and upload them to the e-portal, while noting that the appellant has failed to rectify defects in the appeal.
Further Order
The Tribunal granted an adjournment request from the appellant's counsel, directing them to affix the required stamp and upload the application to the e-Portal, and rescheduled the matter for 27.04.2022.
Delay condonation
The Tribunal granted the respondent a 10-day extension to file objections to the application for condonation of delay and grounds of appeal, with subsequent timelines set for replies and electronic filing.
Delay condonation
The Tribunal noted a discrepancy regarding the respondent's name and directed the appellant to take necessary steps to rectify the defect before the next hearing on 11.01.2022.
Delay condonation
The Tribunal allowed the appellant's application to amend the respondent's name and directed the respondent to file their Vakalatnama and objections against the limitation application within one week.
Delay condonation
The Tribunal adjourned the appeal to 24.11.2021 and directed the parties to exchange pleadings and file originals in the Registry at least one week before the next hearing.
Delay condonation
The Tribunal directed the appellant to correct the respondent's name in Form L and granted the respondent 10 days to file objections to the condonation of delay application and grounds of appeal.
Delay condonation
The Tribunal granted the respondent two weeks to file objections to the application for condonation of delay and the grounds of appeal, with a subsequent timeline set for the applicant's reply.
Delay condonation
The Tribunal directed the appellant to re-send the appeal documents via email due to a previous error and ordered both parties to file objections and replies within specified timelines before the next hearing on 31.08.2021.
Delay condonation
The Tribunal granted the respondent two weeks to file objections to the application for condonation of delay and the grounds of appeal, with subsequent timelines set for replies and filing of pleadings.
Delay condonation
The Tribunal addressed a registry objection regarding the respondent's name and issued notice on the application for condonation of delay, directing parties to exchange documents via email and upload filings to the e-portal.
Tribunal Order #0901126024972021-22-07-2022
The Tribunal dismissed the appeal as not maintainable because the project was not registered with RERA and, pursuant to Supreme Court precedent, the Act's provisions do not apply to projects completed or largely possessed prior to its promulgation.
Tribunal Order #0901126024972021-24-11-2021
The Tribunal allowed the appellant's application to amend the respondent's name and directed the respondent to file their Vakalatnama and objections against the limitation application within one week.
Tribunal Disposal & Final Award Ruling
The Tribunal dismissed the appeal as not maintainable because the project was not registered with RERA and, pursuant to Supreme Court precedent, the Act's provisions do not apply to projects completed or largely possessed prior to its promulgation. Awarded in favor of Respondent.
Final Tribunal Order & Ruling Verdict Summary
Official Ruling Summary
The Tribunal dismissed the appeal as not maintainable because the project was not registered with RERA and, pursuant to Supreme Court precedent, the Act's provisions do not apply to projects completed or largely possessed prior to its promulgation.
Ruling Awarded To
Respondent
Statutory Sections Cited (RERA Act 2016)
Appearing Legal Counsel & Advocates
Appellant Advocate(s)
- Samanvya Dhar Dwivedi
Respondent Advocate(s)
- Siddharth Nandwani
Official RERA Tribunal Orders (2)
The Tribunal dismissed the appeal as not maintainable because the project was not registered with RERA and, pursuant to Supreme Court precedent, the Act's provisions do not apply to projects completed or largely possessed prior to its promulgation.
The Tribunal allowed the appellant's application to amend the respondent's name and directed the respondent to file their Vakalatnama and objections against the limitation application within one week.
Need to research all rulings for super realtech pvt. ltd.?
Extract builder dossiers, check execution status, and draft RERA appeal petitions in minutes using TathyaGrid.