Appellant / Complainant
Vikas Gupta
Respondent
Real Estate Regulatory Authority, Rudra Buildwell Project Private Limited
rudra buildwell project private limited
Appellant
Legal Issues & Claims Raised
Case Procedural History & Progression Tree
Visual step-by-step tree detailing dispute origin, interim hearings, and final tribunal ruling.
Complaint Filing & Dispute Registration
Complaint registered under Case ID 0901126024732025 by Vikas Gupta against Real Estate Regulatory Authority, Rudra Buildwell Project Private Limited before up_rera.
Admission
The Tribunal allowed the appeal to correct a typographical error in the appellant's name from 'Vilas' to 'Vikas' and issued a directive that quasi-judicial orders cannot rely solely on reports from Law Researchers.
Admission
The Tribunal proceeded ex-parte against Respondent No. 2 and granted Respondent No. 1 a final 10-day extension to file objections, with the next hearing scheduled for 27.01.2026.
Delay condonation
The Tribunal granted the second respondent a final ten-day extension to file objections and scheduled the appeal for a hearing on 17.12.2025.
Admission
The Tribunal noted sufficient service of notice on the respondent and granted Respondent No. 2 ten days to file an objection, followed by seven days for the appellant to file a rejoinder.
Admission
The Tribunal issued a fresh notice to Respondent No. 2 and outlined the procedural timeline for service of the appeal memo and the filing of objections and replies.
Admission
The Tribunal granted the respondent ten days to file objections and one week thereafter for a rejoinder, scheduling the next hearing for October 7, 2025.
Admission
The Tribunal issued a notice to the respondent and established a procedural timeline for the service of appeal documents and the filing of objections and replies.
Tribunal Order #0901126024732025-27-01-2026
The Tribunal allowed the appeal to correct a typographical error in the appellant's name from 'Vilas' to 'Vikas' and issued a directive that quasi-judicial orders cannot rely solely on reports from Law Researchers.
Tribunal Disposal & Final Award Ruling
The Tribunal allowed the appeal to correct a typographical error in the appellant's name from 'Vilas' to 'Vikas' and issued a directive that quasi-judicial orders cannot rely solely on reports from Law Researchers. Awarded in favor of Appellant.
Final Tribunal Order & Ruling Verdict Summary
Official Ruling Summary
The Tribunal allowed the appeal to correct a typographical error in the appellant's name from 'Vilas' to 'Vikas' and issued a directive that quasi-judicial orders cannot rely solely on reports from Law Researchers.
Ruling Awarded To
Appellant
Statutory Sections Cited (RERA Act 2016)
Appearing Legal Counsel & Advocates
Appellant Advocate(s)
- Ajay Kumar Singh
Respondent Advocate(s)
- Shobhit Mohan Shukla
Official RERA Tribunal Orders (1)
The Tribunal allowed the appeal to correct a typographical error in the appellant's name from 'Vilas' to 'Vikas' and issued a directive that quasi-judicial orders cannot rely solely on reports from Law Researchers.
Need to research all rulings for rudra buildwell project private limited?
Extract builder dossiers, check execution status, and draft RERA appeal petitions in minutes using TathyaGrid.