Appellant / Complainant
Saransh Krishna
Respondent
Swastik Multitrade Pvt. Ltd.
swastik multitrade pvt. ltd.
Respondent
Case Procedural History & Progression Tree
Visual step-by-step tree detailing dispute origin, interim hearings, and final tribunal ruling.
Complaint Filing & Dispute Registration
Complaint registered under Case ID 0901126024632021 by Saransh Krishna against Swastik Multitrade Pvt. Ltd. before up_rera.
For Order
The appellant requested to withdraw the appeal following a settlement between the parties, which the Tribunal permitted, resulting in the dismissal of the appeal as withdrawn.
For Order
The Tribunal adjourned the proceedings due to a call by the Bar Council of Uttar Pradesh for lawyers to abstain from judicial work, rescheduling the matter for 16.10.2023.
For Order
The Tribunal adjourned the proceedings to 06.09.2023 following a joint request from the parties who are contemplating a settlement.
Hearing
The Tribunal adjourned the proceedings following a report that the parties have reached an amicable settlement and are scheduled to sign a conveyance deed on 09.06.2023.
Hearing
The Tribunal granted an adjournment of the proceedings following a request from the appellant's counsel regarding a potential amicable settlement between the parties.
Hearing
The Tribunal granted an adjournment following a request from the respondent's counsel, noting that the parties are nearing an amicable settlement. The matter is scheduled for further orders on 24.03.2023.
Hearing
The Tribunal granted an adjournment requested by the appellant's counsel and directed the appellant to re-upload their reply to the respondent's objections within one week.
Hearing
The Tribunal has noted that no time is left for the current proceedings and has scheduled the appeal for orders on 15.09.2022.
Hearing
The Tribunal directed the appellant to file objections to the respondent's uploaded calculation chart and scheduled the matter for further orders on 02.09.2022.
Hearing
The respondent has paid Rs. 2,00,000 via RTGS, and the respondent's counsel committed to verifying the remaining dues and attempting full payment within 10 days; upon receipt of the total amount, the appellant is directed to execute a sale deed in favor of the respondent.
Hearing
The Tribunal directed the respondent to pay the remaining balance to the appellant within 10 days and ordered the respondent to provide a draft copy of the sale deed for the appellant's perusal.
Hearing
The Tribunal directed the respondent to refund Rs. 8,53,000/- with interest (MCLR+1%) to the appellant, contingent upon the appellant executing a sale deed back to the respondent within three months, with all registry costs borne by the respondent.
Hearing
The Tribunal addressed a dispute regarding development charges and delayed possession of an allotted plot, granting the respondent's counsel a final opportunity to appear and providing a conditional proposal for handing over possession based on whether the land falls within the Lucknow Development Authority's notified area.
Hearing
The Tribunal directed the respondent to submit details of alleged outstanding development charges and ordered the respondent's authorized representative to appear at the next hearing to facilitate a potential settlement regarding the appellant's possession of the plot.
Hearing
The Tribunal granted the appellant one week to amend their prayer clause and directed both parties to file pleadings and upload them to the e-portal before the next hearing on 10.01.2022.
Hearing
The Tribunal directed the respondent to explain why possession of the plot has not been handed over to the appellant, noting that according to the conveyance deed, possession should have been provided within two years of its execution on 10.06.2019.
Hearing
The Tribunal granted a 10-day extension to the appellant to file a reply to the respondent's objections and scheduled the next hearing for November 22, 2021.
Hearing
The Tribunal granted the appellant one week to file a reply to the respondent's objections and scheduled the next hearing for 29.10.2021.
Delay condonation
The Tribunal allowed the application for condonation of delay, citing the COVID-19 pandemic and Supreme Court guidelines as sufficient grounds to excuse the delay in filing the appeal.
Delay condonation
The Tribunal directed the respondent to file physical copies of their objections and instructed both parties to upload documents to the e-portal and file originals in the Registry before the next hearing.
Delay condonation
The Tribunal granted the respondent three days to file objections to the condonation of delay application and directed parties to upload pleadings on the e-portal before the next hearing on 23.08.2021.
Delay condonation
The Tribunal granted the respondent two weeks to file objections to the application for condonation of delay and the memo of appeal, following their failure to appear despite receiving notice.
Delay condonation
The Tribunal issued notice on the application for condonation of delay and directed the parties to exchange documents via email and upload objections/replies on the e-portal before the next hearing on 13.07.2021.
Tribunal Order #0901126024632021-07-04-2022
The Tribunal directed the respondent to refund Rs. 8,53,000/- with interest (MCLR+1%) to the appellant, contingent upon the appellant executing a sale deed back to the respondent within three months, with all registry costs borne by the respondent.
Tribunal Order #0901126024632021-18-07-2022
The respondent has paid Rs. 2,00,000 via RTGS, and the respondent's counsel committed to verifying the remaining dues and attempting full payment within 10 days; upon receipt of the total amount, the appellant is directed to execute a sale deed in favor of the respondent.
Tribunal Order #0901126024632021-22-11-2021
The Tribunal directed the respondent to explain why possession of the plot has not been handed over to the appellant, noting that according to the conveyance deed, possession should have been provided within two years of its execution on 10.06.2019.
Tribunal Order #0901126024632021-07-09-2021
The Tribunal allowed the application for condonation of delay, citing the COVID-19 pandemic and Supreme Court guidelines as sufficient grounds to excuse the delay in filing the appeal.
Tribunal Order #0901126024632021-04-07-2022
The Tribunal directed the respondent to pay the remaining balance to the appellant within 10 days and ordered the respondent to provide a draft copy of the sale deed for the appellant's perusal.
Tribunal Order #0901126024632021-16-03-2022
The Tribunal addressed a dispute regarding development charges and delayed possession of an allotted plot, granting the respondent's counsel a final opportunity to appear and providing a conditional proposal for handing over possession based on whether the land falls within the Lucknow Development Authority's notified area.
Tribunal Order #0901126024632021-10-01-2022
The Tribunal directed the respondent to submit details of alleged outstanding development charges and ordered the respondent's authorized representative to appear at the next hearing to facilitate a potential settlement regarding the appellant's possession of the plot.
Tribunal Disposal & Final Award Ruling
Dismissed as withdrawn Awarded in favor of Respondent.
Final Tribunal Order & Ruling Verdict Summary
Official Ruling Summary
Dismissed as withdrawn
Ruling Awarded To
Respondent
Appearing Legal Counsel & Advocates
Appellant Advocate(s)
- Abhishek Khare
- Aahuti Agarwal
Respondent Advocate(s)
- Aditya Singh Jadon
- N A
Official RERA Tribunal Orders (7)
The Tribunal directed the respondent to refund Rs. 8,53,000/- with interest (MCLR+1%) to the appellant, contingent upon the appellant executing a sale deed back to the respondent within three months, with all registry costs borne by the respondent.
The respondent has paid Rs. 2,00,000 via RTGS, and the respondent's counsel committed to verifying the remaining dues and attempting full payment within 10 days; upon receipt of the total amount, the appellant is directed to execute a sale deed in favor of the respondent.
The Tribunal directed the respondent to explain why possession of the plot has not been handed over to the appellant, noting that according to the conveyance deed, possession should have been provided within two years of its execution on 10.06.2019.
The Tribunal allowed the application for condonation of delay, citing the COVID-19 pandemic and Supreme Court guidelines as sufficient grounds to excuse the delay in filing the appeal.
The Tribunal directed the respondent to pay the remaining balance to the appellant within 10 days and ordered the respondent to provide a draft copy of the sale deed for the appellant's perusal.
The Tribunal addressed a dispute regarding development charges and delayed possession of an allotted plot, granting the respondent's counsel a final opportunity to appear and providing a conditional proposal for handing over possession based on whether the land falls within the Lucknow Development Authority's notified area.
The Tribunal directed the respondent to submit details of alleged outstanding development charges and ordered the respondent's authorized representative to appear at the next hearing to facilitate a potential settlement regarding the appellant's possession of the plot.
Need to research all rulings for swastik multitrade pvt. ltd.?
Extract builder dossiers, check execution status, and draft RERA appeal petitions in minutes using TathyaGrid.