Appellant / Complainant
Lucknow Development Authority
Respondent
Pranay Jain
Respondent
Case Procedural History & Progression Tree
Visual step-by-step tree detailing dispute origin, interim hearings, and final tribunal ruling.
Complaint Filing & Dispute Registration
Complaint registered under Case ID 0901126024302021 by Lucknow Development Authority against Pranay Jain before up_rera.
Delay condonation
The appeal filed by the Lucknow Development Authority was dismissed for want of prosecution due to the absence of representation on behalf of the appellant.
Delay condonation
The Tribunal granted the respondent 10 days to file objections to the application for condonation of delay and the grounds of appeal, with the matter scheduled for hearing on February 3, 2023.
Delay condonation
The Tribunal directed the appellant to rectify defects in the memo of appeal and provide a complete soft copy to the respondent, establishing a timeline for filing objections and replies before the next hearing.
Delay condonation
The Tribunal has scheduled the appeal for a hearing on December 1, 2022.
Part Heard
The Tribunal granted an adjournment requested by the appellant's counsel and set a timeline for both parties to file objections and replies regarding the condonation of delay and grounds of appeal.
Further Order
The Tribunal granted an adjournment requested by the counsel for the appellant due to his unavailability and directed the parties to exchange pleadings before the next hearing scheduled for 26.09.2022.
Further Order
The Tribunal adjourned the appeal upon a joint request from both counsels and scheduled the matter for 02.09.2022 to address the application for condonation of delay.
Further Order
The Tribunal directed the respondent to file a Vakalatnama and objections to the delay condonation application within 10 days, with subsequent timelines set for replication and electronic filing.
Further Order
The Tribunal issued a notice to the respondent and directed the appellant to serve the memo of appeal via speed post and file an affidavit of service before the next hearing on 26.05.2022.
Further Order
The Tribunal granted an adjournment application submitted by the counsel for the appellant and rescheduled the hearing of the defective appeal to 21.04.2022.
Further Order
The Tribunal noted compliance with Section 43(5) of the Act regarding the C.A. Certificate and directed that notice be issued to the respondent via registered post and email, scheduling the next hearing for 20.01.2022.
Defect Removal
The Tribunal granted an adjournment request but directed the appellant to comply with the legal requirements of Section 43(5) of the Act to rectify a defective appeal.
Defect Removal
The Tribunal adjourned the case to 18.11.2021 for the removal of any existing defects in the filing.
Defect Removal
The Tribunal directed the applicant to remove existing defects in the appeal within 10 days, failing which the defective appeal will be dismissed.
Tribunal Order #0901126024302021-18-11-2021
The Tribunal granted an adjournment request but directed the appellant to comply with the legal requirements of Section 43(5) of the Act to rectify a defective appeal.
Tribunal Order #0901126024302021-14-03-2023
The appeal filed by the Lucknow Development Authority was dismissed for want of prosecution due to the absence of representation on behalf of the appellant.
Tribunal Order #0901126024302021-01-12-2022
The Tribunal directed the appellant to rectify defects in the memo of appeal and provide a complete soft copy to the respondent, establishing a timeline for filing objections and replies before the next hearing.
Tribunal Order #0901126024302021-06-10-2021
The Tribunal directed the applicant to remove existing defects in the appeal within 10 days, failing which the defective appeal will be dismissed.
Tribunal Disposal & Final Award Ruling
The appeal filed by the Lucknow Development Authority was dismissed for want of prosecution due to the absence of representation on behalf of the appellant. Awarded in favor of Respondent.
Final Tribunal Order & Ruling Verdict Summary
Official Ruling Summary
The appeal filed by the Lucknow Development Authority was dismissed for want of prosecution due to the absence of representation on behalf of the appellant.
Ruling Awarded To
Respondent
Appearing Legal Counsel & Advocates
Appellant Advocate(s)
- Amit Yadav
Respondent Advocate(s)
- Alok Kumar Tripathi
Official RERA Tribunal Orders (4)
The Tribunal granted an adjournment request but directed the appellant to comply with the legal requirements of Section 43(5) of the Act to rectify a defective appeal.
The appeal filed by the Lucknow Development Authority was dismissed for want of prosecution due to the absence of representation on behalf of the appellant.
The Tribunal directed the appellant to rectify defects in the memo of appeal and provide a complete soft copy to the respondent, establishing a timeline for filing objections and replies before the next hearing.
The Tribunal directed the applicant to remove existing defects in the appeal within 10 days, failing which the defective appeal will be dismissed.
Need to research all rulings for a builder?
Extract builder dossiers, check execution status, and draft RERA appeal petitions in minutes using TathyaGrid.