Appellant / Complainant
Rinku Modanwal
Respondent
Revival Infratech Private Limited, Lucknow Development Authority
revival infratech private limited
₹11,51,000
Respondent
Legal Issues & Claims Raised
Case Procedural History & Progression Tree
Visual step-by-step tree detailing dispute origin, interim hearings, and final tribunal ruling.
Complaint Filing & Dispute Registration
Complaint registered under Case ID 0901126024042021 by Rinku Modanwal against Revival Infratech Private Limited, Lucknow Development Authority before up_rera.
Delay condonation
The Tribunal dismissed the appeal, ruling that the dispute is a private construction contract rather than a real estate transaction covered under the RERA Act, as there was no formal allotment letter or builder-buyer agreement between the parties.
Delay condonation
The Tribunal granted an adjournment requested by the counsel for the applicant and rescheduled the case for orders/hearing on 06.04.2023.
Hearing
The Tribunal took the physical copy of the complaint on record and scheduled the defective appeal for orders on 28.03.2023.
Hearing
The Tribunal adjourned the proceedings due to the unauthorized absence of the respondent's counsel and rescheduled the matter for orders on 15.03.2023.
Further Order
The Tribunal granted an adjournment application filed by the respondent's counsel and rescheduled the hearing for February 7, 2023.
Further Order
The Tribunal decided to proceed ex-parte against the respondent, M/S Revival Infratech Private Limited, due to their failure to file objections despite being duly served.
Further Order
The Tribunal granted the respondent one additional opportunity to file a reply to the grounds of appeal and scheduled the matter for further orders on 02.11.2022.
Delay condonation
The Tribunal granted the respondent one additional opportunity to file a reply to the grounds of appeal and scheduled the matter for further orders on 27.09.2022.
Hearing
The Tribunal granted a final opportunity to the respondent to file an objection/reply to the application for condonation of delay and scheduled the case for hearing on 26.08.2022.
Hearing
The Tribunal directed the respondent to file a reply to the application for condonation of delay within two weeks and instructed both parties to exchange pleadings via email before the next hearing on 18.07.2022.
Delay condonation
The Tribunal directed the appellant to publish a notice in 'Swatantra Bharat' or 'Amar Ujala' within 15 days due to the respondent's non-appearance.
Delay condonation
The Tribunal granted the appellant one week to rectify defects in their application for service of notice via publication and scheduled the matter for hearing on 31.03.2022.
Notice
The Tribunal granted the appellant permission to file an application for newspaper publication of notice due to insufficient service via speed post and scheduled the matter for March 23, 2022.
Further Order
The Tribunal granted the appellant permission to effect fresh service of notice upon the respondent and directed the parties to exchange objections and replies via email and the e-portal before the next hearing on 14.03.2022.
Defect Removal
The Tribunal directed the appellant's counsel to comply with previous directions regarding service of notice within one week, failing which orders will be passed as per the Act; the case is listed for 12.01.2022.
Defect Removal
The Tribunal directed the issuance of notice to the respondent via dasti, registered post, and email, and scheduled the matter for further orders on 16.12.2021.
Defect Removal
The Tribunal noted that the notice sent to the respondent was returned undelivered and directed the appellant to provide a correct address within 10 days for re-issuance of notice via registered post and email.
Defect Removal
The Tribunal disposed of the application for condonation of delay as the appellant chose not to press it, and issued notice to the respondent with a direction to list the matter on 29.09.2021.
Tribunal Order #0901126024042021-16-05-2023
The Tribunal dismissed the appeal, ruling that the dispute is a private construction contract rather than a real estate transaction covered under the RERA Act, as there was no formal allotment letter or builder-buyer agreement between the parties.
Tribunal Order #0901126024042021-02-11-2022
The Tribunal decided to proceed ex-parte against the respondent, M/S Revival Infratech Private Limited, due to their failure to file objections despite being duly served.
Tribunal Disposal & Final Award Ruling
The Tribunal dismissed the appeal, ruling that the dispute is a private construction contract rather than a real estate transaction covered under the RERA Act, as there was no formal allotment letter or builder-buyer agreement between the parties. Awarded in favor of Respondent.
Final Tribunal Order & Ruling Verdict Summary
Official Ruling Summary
The Tribunal dismissed the appeal, ruling that the dispute is a private construction contract rather than a real estate transaction covered under the RERA Act, as there was no formal allotment letter or builder-buyer agreement between the parties.
Ruling Awarded To
Respondent
Statutory Sections Cited (RERA Act 2016)
Appearing Legal Counsel & Advocates
Appellant Advocate(s)
- Kaviya Singh
Respondent Advocate(s)
- | Counsel for Appellant | |
Official RERA Tribunal Orders (2)
The Tribunal dismissed the appeal, ruling that the dispute is a private construction contract rather than a real estate transaction covered under the RERA Act, as there was no formal allotment letter or builder-buyer agreement between the parties.
The Tribunal decided to proceed ex-parte against the respondent, M/S Revival Infratech Private Limited, due to their failure to file objections despite being duly served.
Need to research all rulings for revival infratech private limited?
Extract builder dossiers, check execution status, and draft RERA appeal petitions in minutes using TathyaGrid.