up_reraStatus: Completed
CASE ID: 0901126023892021

Appellant / Complainant

Sanjay Kumar Srivastava

VS

Respondent

Wondrous Buildmart Private Limited, Eldeco Infrastructure Properties Ltd

Developer Firm

wondrous buildmart private limited

Disputed Amount

2,80,061

Disposal Award

Respondent

TathyaGrid Legal Copilot: Automated procedural intelligence extracted from official RERA tribunal records.
Analyze in Workspace

Legal Issues & Claims Raised

Refund of InvestmentDelay Compensation / InterestUnfair Cancellation & Forfeiture

Case Procedural History & Progression Tree

Visual step-by-step tree detailing dispute origin, interim hearings, and final tribunal ruling.

29 Milestones
Filing Phase

Complaint Filing & Dispute Registration

Complaint registered under Case ID 0901126023892021 by Sanjay Kumar Srivastava against Wondrous Buildmart Private Limited, Eldeco Infrastructure Properties Ltd before up_rera.

Refund of InvestmentDelay Compensation / InterestUnfair Cancellation & Forfeiture
2
Stage 130/05/2023

for delivery of Judgment/Order

The Tribunal dismissed the appeals filed by allottees, ruling that the promoter was not contractually obligated to facilitate subvention loans and finding no illegality in the Regulatory Authority's order directing a principal refund.

3
Stage 228/02/2023

Further Hearing

The Tribunal heard arguments from both parties regarding Appeal-350/2021 and subsequently reserved the judgment for further deliberation.

4
Stage 313/02/2023

Further Hearing

The proceedings were adjourned at the request of the appellant's counsel, with the matter rescheduled for hearing on 28.02.2023.

5
Stage 407/02/2023

Further Hearing

This is a procedural order from the U.P. Real Estate Appellate Tribunal referring to a previous order passed in Appeal No. 345/2021.

6
Stage 506/02/2023

Hearing

The Tribunal has scheduled the appeal for a hearing on 07.02.2023 and directed reference to a previous order passed in Appeal No. 345/2021.

7
Stage 603/01/2023

Further Hearing

The Tribunal granted an adjournment requested by the appellant's counsel due to personal difficulty and rescheduled the hearing for 06.02.2023, noting that no further adjournments will be permitted.

8
Stage 702/12/2022

Further Hearing

The Tribunal noted that pleadings have been exchanged and scheduled the appeal for a hearing on January 3, 2023.

9
Stage 803/11/2022

Further Hearing

No text available.

10
Stage 901/11/2022

Further Hearing

The Tribunal granted the appellant's counsel two days to prepare his brief and adjourned the hearing to 03.11.2022.

11
Stage 1023/09/2022

Further Hearing

The Tribunal corrected a clerical error in its previous order dated 02.09.2022 by modifying the transcribed dates from '15.03.2022 to 25.09.2022' to the correct period of '15.03.2020 to 25.09.2020'.

12
Stage 1102/09/2022

Further Hearing

The Tribunal granted the respondent one week to seek instructions regarding the payment of interest on the deposited amount, excluding the Covid-19 pandemic period, and scheduled the matter for 23.09.2022.

13
Stage 1217/08/2022

Further Order

The Tribunal noted that pleadings have been exchanged and scheduled the appeal for a hearing on 02.09.2022.

14
Stage 1326/07/2022

Further Order

The Tribunal granted the appellant's counsel additional time to study the agreement regarding loan obligations and adjourned the matter to 17.08.2022.

15
Stage 1416/05/2022

Further Order

The Tribunal adjourned the appeal to 26.07.2022 because the counsel for the appellant was unable to attend the proceeding due to personal reasons.

16
Stage 1528/04/2022

Further Order

The Tribunal granted a request for adjournment from the appellant's counsel and scheduled the appeal for hearing on 16.05.2022.

17
Stage 1615/04/2022

Further Order

No text available.

18
Stage 1709/03/2022

Hearing

The Tribunal condoned a five-day delay in filing the appeal, citing COVID-19 related relaxations granted by the Supreme Court, and directed the Registry to register the defective appeal as a regular appeal.

19
Stage 1806/01/2022

Hearing

The Tribunal granted the appellant 10 days to file a reply to the respondent's objections and scheduled the matter for hearing on January 27, 2022.

20
Stage 1914/12/2021

Hearing

The Tribunal granted the appellant 10 days to file a reply to the respondent's objections and scheduled the case for hearing on the application for condonation of delay on 06.01.2022.

21
Stage 2024/11/2021

Hearing

The Tribunal granted the respondent a one-week extension to file objections to the application for condonation of delay and grounds of appeal, with a subsequent week allowed for the applicant's reply.

22
Stage 2101/10/2021

Hearing

The Tribunal directed the respondent to file objections to the limitation application and grounds of appeal before the next hearing date, scheduling the matter for 24.11.2021.

23
Stage 2209/09/2021

Delay condonation

The Tribunal issued notice to the respondent and scheduled a hearing for October 1, 2021, to address the disposal of the limitation application and its objections.

24
Stage 2305/05/2021

Delay condonation

No text available.

25
Stage 2408/04/2021

Delay condonation

No text available.

26
Stage 25Interim Order

Tribunal Order #0901126023892021-09-03-2022

The Tribunal condoned a five-day delay in filing the appeal, citing COVID-19 related relaxations granted by the Supreme Court, and directed the Registry to register the defective appeal as a regular appeal.

27
Stage 26Final Ruling Order

Tribunal Order #0901126023892021-30-05-2023

The Tribunal dismissed the appeals filed by allottees, ruling that the promoter was not contractually obligated to facilitate subvention loans and finding no illegality in the Regulatory Authority's order directing a principal refund.

28
Stage 27Interim Order

Tribunal Order #0901126023892021-23-09-2022

The Tribunal corrected a clerical error in its previous order dated 02.09.2022 by modifying the transcribed dates from '15.03.2022 to 25.09.2022' to the correct period of '15.03.2020 to 25.09.2020'.

Disposal Phase

Tribunal Disposal & Final Award Ruling

The Tribunal dismissed the appeals filed by allottees, ruling that the promoter was not contractually obligated to facilitate subvention loans and finding no illegality in the Regulatory Authority's order directing a principal refund. Awarded in favor of Respondent.

Disposal Winner: RespondentStatus: Completed

Final Tribunal Order & Ruling Verdict Summary

Official Ruling Summary

The Tribunal dismissed the appeals filed by allottees, ruling that the promoter was not contractually obligated to facilitate subvention loans and finding no illegality in the Regulatory Authority's order directing a principal refund.

Ruling Awarded To

Respondent

Verified Tribunal DocumentationDownload Official Final Tribunal Order PDF

Statutory Sections Cited (RERA Act 2016)

Section 18(1)Section 11(5)

Appearing Legal Counsel & Advocates

Appellant Advocate(s)

  • Ishan Khanna

Respondent Advocate(s)

  • Vinay Lakhani
  • Saurabh Misra

Official RERA Tribunal Orders (3)

INTERIM_ORDEROrder ID: 0901126023892021-09-03-2022

The Tribunal condoned a five-day delay in filing the appeal, citing COVID-19 related relaxations granted by the Supreme Court, and directed the Registry to register the defective appeal as a regular appeal.

FINAL_ORDEROrder ID: 0901126023892021-30-05-2023

The Tribunal dismissed the appeals filed by allottees, ruling that the promoter was not contractually obligated to facilitate subvention loans and finding no illegality in the Regulatory Authority's order directing a principal refund.

INTERIM_ORDEROrder ID: 0901126023892021-23-09-2022

The Tribunal corrected a clerical error in its previous order dated 02.09.2022 by modifying the transcribed dates from '15.03.2022 to 25.09.2022' to the correct period of '15.03.2020 to 25.09.2020'.

TathyaGrid RERA Intelligence AI

Need to research all rulings for wondrous buildmart private limited?

Extract builder dossiers, check execution status, and draft RERA appeal petitions in minutes using TathyaGrid.

Open AI Workspace →