Appellant / Complainant
Pallavi Pandey
Respondent
Kbn Infratech Pvt Ltd
kbn infratech pvt ltd
₹5,54,500
Respondent
Legal Issues & Claims Raised
Case Procedural History & Progression Tree
Visual step-by-step tree detailing dispute origin, interim hearings, and final tribunal ruling.
Complaint Filing & Dispute Registration
Complaint registered under Case ID 0901126023412021 by Pallavi Pandey against Kbn Infratech Pvt Ltd before up_rera.
for delivery of Judgment/Order
The Tribunal dismissed the appeal, ruling that a complaint for compensation under Section 18(1) of the RERA Act is not maintainable before the Adjudicating Officer once an allottee has already taken possession of the unit.
Further Hearing
The Tribunal heard arguments regarding the lack of documentary evidence for losses suffered by the appellant and has reserved its judgment.
Further Hearing
The matter was adjourned due to lack of time, with the case scheduled to be put up for further hearing on 19.10.2022.
Further Hearing
The appeal was adjourned because the appellant was not present; the matter is scheduled for hearing on 18.10.2022 as pleadings have been exchanged.
Further Hearing
The Tribunal granted an adjournment requested by the appellant's counsel due to illness and scheduled the appeal for a hearing on 16.09.2022.
Further Hearing
The Tribunal has noted that pleadings are complete and, upon the joint request of both parties' counsels, adjourned the matter for hearing on 26.08.2022.
Further Hearing
The proceedings were adjourned due to a request for adjournment by the appellant's counsel on medical grounds, with the matter rescheduled for hearing on 03.08.2022.
Further Hearing
The Tribunal directed the respondent to produce the original file regarding the debarment of the unit within three days and permitted the appellant to bring additional documents on record.
Hearing
The Tribunal directed the respondent to produce the original application dated 16.02.2018 and copies of the Agreements to Sell dated 14.02.2018 and 17.02.2018 for examination.
Further Order
The Tribunal noted that pleadings are complete and, upon joint request of the counsels, scheduled the appeal for final hearing on 23.05.2022, with a directive that no further adjournments will be granted.
Further Order
The Tribunal granted the appellant permission to file a replication/rejoinder against the respondent's reply and scheduled the next hearing for April 27, 2022.
Further Order
The Tribunal granted the appellant permission to file a rejoinder/replication against the respondent's reply and directed that a copy be served to the respondent via email at least three days before the next hearing.
Delay condonation
The Tribunal allowed the application for condonation of delay in filing the appeal, citing the COVID-19 pandemic and Supreme Court guidelines, and directed the defective appeal to be registered as a Regular Appeal.
Further Order
The Tribunal granted the respondent three days to file a Vakalatnama and an objection to the limitation application, scheduling the matter for December 6, 2021.
Delay condonation
The Tribunal granted the respondent ten days to file a Vakalat Nama, objections to the limitation application, and a reply to the appeal, while directing the appellant to file a rejoinder affidavit before the next hearing on 17.11.2021.
Delay condonation
The Tribunal noted a delay in filing the appeal and issued notice to the respondent, directing the appellant to serve copies of the application for condonation of delay and the memo of appeal via speed post and email.
Tribunal Order #0901126023412021-23-05-2022
The Tribunal directed the respondent to produce the original application dated 16.02.2018 and copies of the Agreements to Sell dated 14.02.2018 and 17.02.2018 for examination.
Tribunal Order #0901126023412021-18-05-2023
The Tribunal dismissed the appeal, ruling that a complaint for compensation under Section 18(1) of the RERA Act is not maintainable before the Adjudicating Officer once an allottee has already taken possession of the unit.
Tribunal Order #0901126023412021-06-12-2021
The Tribunal allowed the application for condonation of delay in filing the appeal, citing the COVID-19 pandemic and Supreme Court guidelines, and directed the defective appeal to be registered as a Regular Appeal.
Tribunal Disposal & Final Award Ruling
The Tribunal dismissed the appeal, ruling that a complaint for compensation under Section 18(1) of the RERA Act is not maintainable before the Adjudicating Officer once an allottee has already taken possession of the unit. Awarded in favor of Respondent.
Final Tribunal Order & Ruling Verdict Summary
Official Ruling Summary
The Tribunal dismissed the appeal, ruling that a complaint for compensation under Section 18(1) of the RERA Act is not maintainable before the Adjudicating Officer once an allottee has already taken possession of the unit.
Ruling Awarded To
Respondent
Statutory Sections Cited (RERA Act 2016)
Appearing Legal Counsel & Advocates
Appellant Advocate(s)
- Jagrit Sharma
Respondent Advocate(s)
- Anurag Singh
Official RERA Tribunal Orders (3)
The Tribunal directed the respondent to produce the original application dated 16.02.2018 and copies of the Agreements to Sell dated 14.02.2018 and 17.02.2018 for examination.
The Tribunal dismissed the appeal, ruling that a complaint for compensation under Section 18(1) of the RERA Act is not maintainable before the Adjudicating Officer once an allottee has already taken possession of the unit.
The Tribunal allowed the application for condonation of delay in filing the appeal, citing the COVID-19 pandemic and Supreme Court guidelines, and directed the defective appeal to be registered as a Regular Appeal.
Need to research all rulings for kbn infratech pvt ltd?
Extract builder dossiers, check execution status, and draft RERA appeal petitions in minutes using TathyaGrid.