Appellant / Complainant
Lucknow Development Authority
Respondent
Rakesh Kumar Bajpai
Respondent
Case Procedural History & Progression Tree
Visual step-by-step tree detailing dispute origin, interim hearings, and final tribunal ruling.
Complaint Filing & Dispute Registration
Complaint registered under Case ID 0901126022222021 by Lucknow Development Authority against Rakesh Kumar Bajpai before up_rera.
Hearing
The appeal filed by the Lucknow Development Authority was dismissed for want of prosecution due to the appellant's failure to appear or assign new counsel following the resignation of their previous lawyer.
Hearing
The Tribunal directed the appellant to file a reply to the respondent's objections within one week and scheduled the matter for hearing on 16.03.2023.
Further Order
The Tribunal has heard the arguments and reserved its judgment specifically on the point of limitation regarding Appeal-311/2021.
Delay condonation
The Tribunal directed the respondent's counsel to file a Vakalatnama and objections at least three days before the next hearing, scheduling the case for 07.02.2022 to dispose of the limitation application.
Delay condonation
The respondent appeared in person and stated they were unaware of the pending limitation application.
Defect Removal
The Tribunal issued notice to the respondent via registered post and email following the appellant's claim of compliance with Section 43(5) of the Act, and scheduled the matter for 03.12.2021.
Defect Removal
The Tribunal noted the deposit of Rs. 6,87,805/- in compliance with Section 43(5) of the Act but directed the appellant to rectify remaining procedural defects before the next hearing on 15.11.2021.
Tribunal Order #0901126022222021-16-03-2023
The appeal filed by the Lucknow Development Authority was dismissed for want of prosecution due to the appellant's failure to appear or assign new counsel following the resignation of their previous lawyer.
Tribunal Disposal & Final Award Ruling
The appeal filed by the Lucknow Development Authority was dismissed for want of prosecution due to the appellant's failure to appear or assign new counsel following the resignation of their previous lawyer. Awarded in favor of Respondent.
Final Tribunal Order & Ruling Verdict Summary
Official Ruling Summary
The appeal filed by the Lucknow Development Authority was dismissed for want of prosecution due to the appellant's failure to appear or assign new counsel following the resignation of their previous lawyer.
Ruling Awarded To
Respondent
Appearing Legal Counsel & Advocates
Appellant Advocate(s)
- Amit Yadav
Respondent Advocate(s)
- | Counsel for Appellant AMIT YADAV | |
- | Counsel for Appellant AMIT YADAV | Counsel for Appellant AMIT YADAV | |
Official RERA Tribunal Orders (1)
The appeal filed by the Lucknow Development Authority was dismissed for want of prosecution due to the appellant's failure to appear or assign new counsel following the resignation of their previous lawyer.
Need to research all rulings for a builder?
Extract builder dossiers, check execution status, and draft RERA appeal petitions in minutes using TathyaGrid.