Appellant / Complainant
Lucknow Development Authority
Respondent
Aradhana Pandey
Respondent
Case Procedural History & Progression Tree
Visual step-by-step tree detailing dispute origin, interim hearings, and final tribunal ruling.
Complaint Filing & Dispute Registration
Complaint registered under Case ID 0901126022062021 by Lucknow Development Authority against Aradhana Pandey before up_rera.
Hearing
The appeal filed by the Lucknow Development Authority was dismissed for want of prosecution due to the absence of counsel and failure to assign a new representative.
Hearing
The Tribunal noted that the previous judgment could not be delivered due to a change in Bench composition and ordered the appeal to be listed for a fresh hearing on 16.03.2023.
to file objections and its reply
The Tribunal heard arguments from both counsel but reserved the judgment due to technical issues with the online portal access.
Exchange of pleadings
The Tribunal adjourned the appeal to 16.09.2022 for hearing due to the absence of the respondent.
Hearing
The Tribunal granted the appellant permission to file a replication/rejoinder to the respondent's reply and directed that a copy be sent via email before the next hearing on 18.08.2022.
Hearing
The Tribunal allowed the application for condonation of delay upon payment of Rs. 3000 in costs and directed the registry to convert the defective appeal into a regular appeal.
Delay condonation
The Tribunal adjourned the matter to 29.04.2022 for the disposal of a limitation application and any related objections.
Delay condonation
The Tribunal granted an adjournment requested by the appellant's counsel and scheduled the case for 07.02.2022 to address the limitation application and its objections.
Delay condonation
The Tribunal adjourned the case to 10.01.2022 and directed both counsels to appear on the next date to avoid the disposal of the limitation application.
Defect Removal
The Tribunal issued notice to the respondent via registered post and email following the appellant's claim of compliance with Section 43(5) of the Act, and scheduled the matter for December 3, 2021.
Defect Removal
The Tribunal noted the deposit of Rs. 1,49,272/- for compliance with Section 43(5) but directed the appellant to remove remaining registry defects before the next hearing on 15.11.2021.
Tribunal Order #0901126022062021-16-03-2023
The appeal filed by the Lucknow Development Authority was dismissed for want of prosecution due to the absence of counsel and failure to assign a new representative.
Tribunal Order #0901126022062021-29-04-2022
The Tribunal allowed the application for condonation of delay upon payment of Rs. 3000 in costs and directed the registry to convert the defective appeal into a regular appeal.
Tribunal Disposal & Final Award Ruling
The appeal filed by the Lucknow Development Authority was dismissed for want of prosecution due to the absence of counsel and failure to assign a new representative. Awarded in favor of Respondent.
Final Tribunal Order & Ruling Verdict Summary
Official Ruling Summary
The appeal filed by the Lucknow Development Authority was dismissed for want of prosecution due to the absence of counsel and failure to assign a new representative.
Ruling Awarded To
Respondent
Appearing Legal Counsel & Advocates
Appellant Advocate(s)
- Amit Yadav
Respondent Advocate(s)
- Atul Tripathi
Official RERA Tribunal Orders (2)
The appeal filed by the Lucknow Development Authority was dismissed for want of prosecution due to the absence of counsel and failure to assign a new representative.
The Tribunal allowed the application for condonation of delay upon payment of Rs. 3000 in costs and directed the registry to convert the defective appeal into a regular appeal.
Need to research all rulings for a builder?
Extract builder dossiers, check execution status, and draft RERA appeal petitions in minutes using TathyaGrid.