up_reraStatus: Completed
CASE ID: 0901126021982025

Appellant / Complainant

Manish Malhotra

VS

Respondent

Jupiter Infrastructure Bangalore Pvt. Ltd., Shree Kapileshwar Properties Private Limited, Ashok Sharma

Developer Firm

jupiter infrastructure bangalore pvt. ltd.

Disputed Amount

9,15,000

Disposal Award

Appellant

TathyaGrid Legal Copilot: Automated procedural intelligence extracted from official RERA tribunal records.
Analyze in Workspace

Legal Issues & Claims Raised

Delay in PossessionDelay Compensation / InterestJurisdiction & Maintainability

Case Procedural History & Progression Tree

Visual step-by-step tree detailing dispute origin, interim hearings, and final tribunal ruling.

11 Milestones
Filing Phase

Complaint Filing & Dispute Registration

Complaint registered under Case ID 0901126021982025 by Manish Malhotra against Jupiter Infrastructure Bangalore Pvt. Ltd., Shree Kapileshwar Properties Private Limited, Ashok Sharma before up_rera.

Delay in PossessionDelay Compensation / InterestJurisdiction & Maintainability
2
Stage 120/11/2025

Admission

The Appellate Tribunal set aside the Adjudicating Officer's order that had rejected a compensation complaint due to lack of project registration, directing that the complaint be restored and decided on merit following the Regulatory Authority's determination of whether the project qualifies as an 'ongoing project' under the Act.

3
Stage 230/10/2025

Admission

The Tribunal granted the appellant's request to adjourn the matter and rescheduled the appeal for hearing on 20.11.2025, with a directive to upload a subsequent complaint filed before U.P. RERA in the interim.

4
Stage 313/10/2025

Admission

The Tribunal has ordered this appeal to be listed before a Larger Bench on 30.10.2025, alongside Appeal No. 365 of 2019, to resolve the legal issue regarding the maintainability of complaints involving unregistered projects.

5
Stage 404/09/2025

Admission

The Tribunal noted the respondents' failure to appear or file objections despite sufficient service of notice and ordered the matter to proceed ex-parte, scheduling the final hearing for 13.10.2025.

6
Stage 511/08/2025

Admission

The Tribunal accepted proof of service for the respondents and granted them ten days to file objections, with the matter scheduled for a follow-up hearing on 04.09.2025.

7
Stage 604/08/2025

Admission

The Tribunal granted the appellant ten days to file an affidavit of service and scheduled the appeal for hearing on 11.08.2025.

8
Stage 708/07/2025

Admission

The Tribunal issued a notice to the respondent and established a procedural timeline for the service of appeal documents and the exchange of objections and replies.

9
Stage 8Final Ruling Order

Tribunal Order #0901126021982025-20-11-2025

The Appellate Tribunal set aside the Adjudicating Officer's order that had rejected a compensation complaint due to lack of project registration, directing that the complaint be restored and decided on merit following the Regulatory Authority's determination of whether the project qualifies as an 'ongoing project' under the Act.

10
Stage 9Interim Order

Tribunal Order #0901126021982025-13-10-2025

The Tribunal has ordered this appeal to be listed before a Larger Bench on 30.10.2025, alongside Appeal No. 365 of 2019, to resolve the legal issue regarding the maintainability of complaints involving unregistered projects.

Disposal Phase

Tribunal Disposal & Final Award Ruling

The Appellate Tribunal set aside the Adjudicating Officer's order that had rejected a compensation complaint due to lack of project registration, directing that the complaint be restored and decided on merit following the Regulatory Authority's determination of whether the project qualifies as an 'ongoing project' under the Act. Awarded in favor of Appellant.

Disposal Winner: AppellantStatus: Completed

Final Tribunal Order & Ruling Verdict Summary

Official Ruling Summary

The Appellate Tribunal set aside the Adjudicating Officer's order that had rejected a compensation complaint due to lack of project registration, directing that the complaint be restored and decided on merit following the Regulatory Authority's determination of whether the project qualifies as an 'ongoing project' under the Act.

Ruling Awarded To

Appellant

Verified Tribunal DocumentationDownload Official Final Tribunal Order PDF

Statutory Sections Cited (RERA Act 2016)

Section 18(1)Section 3Section 79

Appearing Legal Counsel & Advocates

Appellant Advocate(s)

  • In Person

Official RERA Tribunal Orders (2)

FINAL_ORDEROrder ID: 0901126021982025-20-11-2025

The Appellate Tribunal set aside the Adjudicating Officer's order that had rejected a compensation complaint due to lack of project registration, directing that the complaint be restored and decided on merit following the Regulatory Authority's determination of whether the project qualifies as an 'ongoing project' under the Act.

INTERIM_ORDEROrder ID: 0901126021982025-13-10-2025

The Tribunal has ordered this appeal to be listed before a Larger Bench on 30.10.2025, alongside Appeal No. 365 of 2019, to resolve the legal issue regarding the maintainability of complaints involving unregistered projects.

TathyaGrid RERA Intelligence AI

Need to research all rulings for jupiter infrastructure bangalore pvt. ltd.?

Extract builder dossiers, check execution status, and draft RERA appeal petitions in minutes using TathyaGrid.

Open AI Workspace →