Appellant / Complainant
Himalaya Realestate Pvt Ltd
Respondent
Janmejay Rai
himalaya realestate pvt ltd
Respondent
Case Procedural History & Progression Tree
Visual step-by-step tree detailing dispute origin, interim hearings, and final tribunal ruling.
Complaint Filing & Dispute Registration
Complaint registered under Case ID 0901126021922023 by Himalaya Realestate Pvt Ltd against Janmejay Rai before up_rera.
Delay condonation
The U.P. Real Estate Appellate Tribunal rejected the appellant's application for condonation of delay and dismissed the appeal, ruling that the negligence of the appellant's legal representative did not constitute sufficient cause to excuse the 125-day delay.
Delay condonation
The Tribunal has granted a request to list the defective appeal for consideration of the application for condonation of delay and subsequent hearing on 16.04.2025.
Delay condonation
The Tribunal has scheduled the defective appeal for hearing on the application for condonation of delay on 19.03.2025, noting that no further adjournments will be granted.
Delay condonation
The Tribunal has rescheduled the hearing of Appeal-456/2023 to 18.02.2025 before the regular Bench at the request of the parties.
For Order
The Tribunal granted the respondent one week to file objections to the appellant's interim stay application and directed both parties to submit a chart detailing delays in the completion and handing over of possession of the respective units.
Delay condonation
The respondent stated they are not pressing for the execution of any Recovery Certificate (R.C.) against the appellant, and the matter is adjourned to 05.11.2024 for hearing.
Delay condonation
This is a procedural order referring the parties to a previously passed order in Appeal No. D 446/2023.
Delay condonation
The Tribunal granted the appellant one week's time to file a rejoinder to the respondent's objections and scheduled the next hearing for August 20, 2024.
Delay condonation
The Tribunal refers the parties to a previous order passed in Appeal No. D 446/2023 for the relevant directions.
Delay condonation
The Tribunal noted the absence of both parties and ordered the defective appeal to be listed on 29.05.2024 for consideration of the application for condonation of delay.
Delay condonation
The Tribunal granted an adjournment requested by the respondent's counsel due to illness and rescheduled the appeal for hearing on 23.05.2024.
Delay condonation
The Tribunal granted a final 10-day extension to the appellant to file a reply to the respondent's objections and scheduled the matter for hearing on 22.04.2024.
Delay condonation
The Tribunal granted the respondent's counsel 10 days to file a reply to the objections regarding the application for condonation of delay and the grounds of appeal, and scheduled the matter for hearing on 14.03.2024.
Delay condonation
The Tribunal noted that the appeal was filed with a delay and no application for condonation was present; consequently, the applicant was granted one week to file such an application, with the matter listed for orders on 11.07.2023.
Tribunal Order #0901126021922023-16-04-2025
The U.P. Real Estate Appellate Tribunal rejected the appellant's application for condonation of delay and dismissed the appeal, ruling that the negligence of the appellant's legal representative did not constitute sufficient cause to excuse the 125-day delay.
Tribunal Order #0901126021922023-03-07-2023
The Tribunal noted that the appeal was filed with a delay and no application for condonation was present; consequently, the applicant was granted one week to file such an application, with the matter listed for orders on 11.07.2023.
Tribunal Order #0901126021922023-02-01-2025
The Tribunal granted the respondent one week to file objections to the appellant's interim stay application and directed both parties to submit a chart detailing delays in the completion and handing over of possession of the respective units.
Tribunal Disposal & Final Award Ruling
The U.P. Real Estate Appellate Tribunal rejected the appellant's application for condonation of delay and dismissed the appeal, ruling that the negligence of the appellant's legal representative did not constitute sufficient cause to excuse the 125-day delay. Awarded in favor of Respondent.
Final Tribunal Order & Ruling Verdict Summary
Official Ruling Summary
The U.P. Real Estate Appellate Tribunal rejected the appellant's application for condonation of delay and dismissed the appeal, ruling that the negligence of the appellant's legal representative did not constitute sufficient cause to excuse the 125-day delay.
Ruling Awarded To
Respondent
Appearing Legal Counsel & Advocates
Appellant Advocate(s)
- Nilaya Gupta
Respondent Advocate(s)
- M.P. Sahai
Official RERA Tribunal Orders (3)
The U.P. Real Estate Appellate Tribunal rejected the appellant's application for condonation of delay and dismissed the appeal, ruling that the negligence of the appellant's legal representative did not constitute sufficient cause to excuse the 125-day delay.
The Tribunal noted that the appeal was filed with a delay and no application for condonation was present; consequently, the applicant was granted one week to file such an application, with the matter listed for orders on 11.07.2023.
The Tribunal granted the respondent one week to file objections to the appellant's interim stay application and directed both parties to submit a chart detailing delays in the completion and handing over of possession of the respective units.
Need to research all rulings for himalaya realestate pvt ltd?
Extract builder dossiers, check execution status, and draft RERA appeal petitions in minutes using TathyaGrid.