Appellant / Complainant
Himalaya Realestate Pvt Ltd
Respondent
Satish Kumar Mishra
himalaya realestate pvt ltd
Respondent
Case Procedural History & Progression Tree
Visual step-by-step tree detailing dispute origin, interim hearings, and final tribunal ruling.
Complaint Filing & Dispute Registration
Complaint registered under Case ID 0901126021892023 by Himalaya Realestate Pvt Ltd against Satish Kumar Mishra before up_rera.
Delay condonation
The U.P. Real Estate Appellate Tribunal rejected the appellant's application for condonation of delay and dismissed the appeal, ruling that the negligence of the appellant's legal representative did not constitute sufficient cause to excuse the 125-day delay.
Delay condonation
The Tribunal granted a request by the appellant's counsel to list the defective appeal for consideration of the application for condonation of delay and a hearing on 16.04.2025.
Delay condonation
The Tribunal has scheduled the defective appeal for hearing on the application for condonation of delay on 19.03.2025, noting that no further adjournments will be granted.
Delay condonation
The Tribunal has granted a request from the parties to list the appeal for hearing before the regular Bench on 18.02.2025.
For Order
The Tribunal granted the respondent one week to file objections to the appellant's interim stay application and directed both parties to submit a chart detailing the delay in handing over possession of the respective units.
Delay condonation
The respondent stated they are not pressing for the execution of any Recovery Certificate (R.C.) against the appellant, and the matter has been adjourned to 05.11.2024 for hearing.
Delay condonation
The Tribunal refers the parties to a previously passed order dated in Appeal No. D 446/2023 for the current orders.
Delay condonation
The Tribunal granted the appellant one week's time to file a rejoinder to the respondent's objections and scheduled the appeal for a hearing on 20.08.2024.
Delay condonation
The order directs the parties to refer to a previously passed order dated in Appeal No. D 446/2023 for the relevant directions.
Delay condonation
The Tribunal has listed a defective appeal for the consideration of a condonation of delay application and a subsequent hearing on 29.05.2024.
Delay condonation
The Tribunal granted an adjournment requested by the appellant's counsel due to illness and rescheduled the appeal for hearing on 23.05.2024.
Delay condonation
The Tribunal refers to a previous order passed in Appeal No. D 446/2023 for the current orders.
Delay condonation
The Tribunal granted the appellant's counsel 10 days to file a reply to the respondent's objection and scheduled the matter for hearing on 18.03.2024 regarding the application for condonation of delay.
Delay condonation
The Tribunal granted the applicant a final 10-day extension to file a reply to the respondent's objections and scheduled the matter for hearing on 15.02.2024.
Delay condonation
The Tribunal granted the respondent 10 days to file objections to the application for condonation of delay and the grounds of appeal, with the matter scheduled for hearing on 29.09.2023.
Delay condonation
The Tribunal verified the appellant's deposit of Rs. 2,59,654/- in compliance with Section 43(5) of the Act and issued notice to the respondent regarding the application for condonation of delay, returnable on 21.08.2023.
Tribunal Order #0901126021892023-16-04-2025
The U.P. Real Estate Appellate Tribunal rejected the appellant's application for condonation of delay and dismissed the appeal, ruling that the negligence of the appellant's legal representative did not constitute sufficient cause to excuse the 125-day delay.
Tribunal Order #0901126021892023-03-07-2023
The Tribunal verified the appellant's deposit of Rs. 2,59,654/- in compliance with Section 43(5) of the Act and issued notice to the respondent regarding the application for condonation of delay, returnable on 21.08.2023.
Tribunal Order #0901126021892023-02-01-2025
The Tribunal granted the respondent one week to file objections to the appellant's interim stay application and directed both parties to submit a chart detailing the delay in handing over possession of the respective units.
Tribunal Disposal & Final Award Ruling
The U.P. Real Estate Appellate Tribunal rejected the appellant's application for condonation of delay and dismissed the appeal, ruling that the negligence of the appellant's legal representative did not constitute sufficient cause to excuse the 125-day delay. Awarded in favor of Respondent.
Final Tribunal Order & Ruling Verdict Summary
Official Ruling Summary
The U.P. Real Estate Appellate Tribunal rejected the appellant's application for condonation of delay and dismissed the appeal, ruling that the negligence of the appellant's legal representative did not constitute sufficient cause to excuse the 125-day delay.
Ruling Awarded To
Respondent
Appearing Legal Counsel & Advocates
Appellant Advocate(s)
- Nilaya Gupta
Respondent Advocate(s)
- Awanitika
Official RERA Tribunal Orders (3)
The U.P. Real Estate Appellate Tribunal rejected the appellant's application for condonation of delay and dismissed the appeal, ruling that the negligence of the appellant's legal representative did not constitute sufficient cause to excuse the 125-day delay.
The Tribunal verified the appellant's deposit of Rs. 2,59,654/- in compliance with Section 43(5) of the Act and issued notice to the respondent regarding the application for condonation of delay, returnable on 21.08.2023.
The Tribunal granted the respondent one week to file objections to the appellant's interim stay application and directed both parties to submit a chart detailing the delay in handing over possession of the respective units.
Need to research all rulings for himalaya realestate pvt ltd?
Extract builder dossiers, check execution status, and draft RERA appeal petitions in minutes using TathyaGrid.