Appellant / Complainant
Pradeep Kumar Routa
Respondent
The Uttar Pradesh Real Estate Regulatory Authority, Gaursons Realty Private Limited
gaursons realty private limited
Appellant
Legal Issues & Claims Raised
Case Procedural History & Progression Tree
Visual step-by-step tree detailing dispute origin, interim hearings, and final tribunal ruling.
Complaint Filing & Dispute Registration
Complaint registered under Case ID 0901126021642021 by Pradeep Kumar Routa against The Uttar Pradesh Real Estate Regulatory Authority, Gaursons Realty Private Limited before up_rera.
Hearing
The Tribunal set aside the Regulatory Authority's order and remanded the complaint to the Regulatory Authority, granting the appellant liberty to challenge the legality of the unit's cancellation order.
Hearing
The court granted an adjournment requested by the appellant's counsel and scheduled the case for orders on 25.05.2025, with a strict directive that no further adjournments will be granted.
Hearing
The Tribunal granted an adjournment application filed by the appellant's counsel and rescheduled the case for hearing on 24.04.2025, noting that no further adjournments will be permitted.
Hearing
The Tribunal has scheduled the matter for a hearing on 27.03.2025 and granted the appellant permission to file a rejoinder in the interim.
Hearing
The Tribunal granted the respondent a final opportunity to file objections to the amendment application and scheduled the appeal for a hearing on March 4, 2025.
Hearing
The Tribunal granted an adjournment requested by the respondent's counsel and scheduled the appeal for hearing on 11.02.2025, while directing the filing of objections to the amendment application in the interim.
Hearing
The Tribunal granted the appellant time to file an amendment application and directed the respondent to submit documents regarding third-party interests in the subject unit, adjourning the matter to 16.01.2025.
Hearing
The Tribunal ordered the attachment of the respondent company's bank account to recover the appellant's deposit and interest, and issued a show-cause notice to Advocate Saghar Mehdi for professional misconduct, which was subsequently withdrawn following an unconditional apology.
Hearing
The Tribunal granted an adjournment to the respondent to file supplementary objections, subject to a cost of Rs. 20,000/- to be paid to the appellant.
Hearing
The Tribunal has granted a request from both parties to adjourn the appeal and has rescheduled the matter for orders/hearing on 19.11.2024.
Hearing
The Tribunal granted the appellant 7 days to file a rejoinder affidavit to the respondent's objections and scheduled the matter for orders on 22.10.2024.
Hearing
The Tribunal granted the appellant three days to file a vakalatnama and directed the counsel to register on the Tribunal's portal, with the matter listed for hearing on 16.08.2024.
Hearing
The Tribunal has adjourned the appeal to 24.07.2024 because the counsel for the respondent is reported to be out of the country.
Hearing
The appeal was adjourned because no one appeared for the appellant and the respondent's counsel was reported to be out of station; the matter is rescheduled for hearing on 29.04.2024.
Hearing
The Tribunal granted the appellant a 10-day extension to file a reply to the respondent's objections and scheduled the next hearing for 22.03.2024.
Hearing
The Tribunal granted the appellant a one-week extension to file a reply to objections and scheduled the next hearing for February 21, 2024.
Hearing
The Tribunal granted an adjournment requested by the respondent's counsel on health grounds and rescheduled the hearing for 11.10.2023.
Hearing
The tribunal adjourned the proceedings due to the appellant's counsel being ill and directed the parties to exchange pleadings in the interim.
Hearing
The Tribunal granted an adjournment to the appellant due to counsel's illness and rescheduled the matter for hearing on 10.05.2023.
For Order
The Tribunal adjourned the matter to 29.03.2023 due to the non-appearance of the appellant's counsel, noting that the case will proceed based on available records if no one appears on the next date.
For Order
The Tribunal closed the appellant's opportunity to file a reply to the respondent's objections due to non-compliance with a previous deadline and subsequently scheduled the matter for hearing on 25.01.2023.
For Order
The Tribunal granted the appellant a one-week extension to file a reply to the respondent's objections and directed the submission of the reply via email and the e-portal.
Hearing
The Tribunal granted a final one-week extension to the appellant to file a reply to the respondent's objections and directed the service of a soft copy via email.
Hearing
The appeal was dismissed for want of prosecution due to the non-appearance of the appellant.
Hearing
The Tribunal granted an adjournment request made by the appellant's counsel and rescheduled the hearing for August 8, 2022.
to file objections and its reply
The Tribunal granted a one-week extension to the appellant to file a reply to the respondent's objections and adjourned the matter to 25.07.2022.
to file objections and its reply
The Tribunal granted the appellant 10 days to file a reply to the respondent's objections and directed the service of a soft copy via email, scheduling the next hearing for 06.07.2022.
to file objections and its reply
The Tribunal granted the appellant's counsel 10 days to file a reply to the respondent's objections and scheduled the appeal for hearing on 18.05.2022.
Hearing
The Tribunal granted an adjournment requested by the appellant's counsel and scheduled the case for a later date.
Hearing
The Tribunal directed the respondent to provide a physical copy of their reply to the appellant and ordered the appellant to file a rejoinder, scheduling the next hearing for February 3, 2022.
Further Order
The Tribunal directed the respondent to file their Vakalatnama and a reply to the grounds of appeal within one week and scheduled the next hearing for 10.01.2022.
Delay condonation
The Tribunal converted the defective appeal into a regular appeal and directed the respondent to file a reply to the grounds of appeal before the next hearing on 02.12.2021.
Hearing
The Tribunal issued notice to the respondent and directed the applicant to serve the memo of appeal via speed post and email, setting a timeline for the filing of objections and replies.
Tribunal Order #0901126021642021-20-05-2025
The Tribunal set aside the Regulatory Authority's order and remanded the complaint to the Regulatory Authority, granting the appellant liberty to challenge the legality of the unit's cancellation order.
Tribunal Order #0901126021642021-21-11-2024
The Tribunal ordered the attachment of the respondent company's bank account to recover the appellant's deposit and interest, and issued a show-cause notice to Advocate Saghar Mehdi for professional misconduct, which was subsequently withdrawn following an unconditional apology.
Tribunal Order #0901126021642021-19-12-2022
The Tribunal closed the appellant's opportunity to file a reply to the respondent's objections due to non-compliance with a previous deadline and subsequently scheduled the matter for hearing on 25.01.2023.
Tribunal Order #0901126021642021-19-11-2024
The Tribunal granted an adjournment to the respondent to file supplementary objections, subject to a cost of Rs. 20,000/- to be paid to the appellant.
Tribunal Order #0901126021642021-12-11-2021
The Tribunal converted the defective appeal into a regular appeal and directed the respondent to file a reply to the grounds of appeal before the next hearing on 02.12.2021.
Tribunal Disposal & Final Award Ruling
The Tribunal set aside the Regulatory Authority's order and remanded the complaint to the Regulatory Authority, granting the appellant liberty to challenge the legality of the unit's cancellation order. Awarded in favor of Appellant.
Final Tribunal Order & Ruling Verdict Summary
Official Ruling Summary
The Tribunal set aside the Regulatory Authority's order and remanded the complaint to the Regulatory Authority, granting the appellant liberty to challenge the legality of the unit's cancellation order.
Ruling Awarded To
Appellant
Statutory Sections Cited (RERA Act 2016)
Appearing Legal Counsel & Advocates
Appellant Advocate(s)
- Saghar Mehdi
- Sumeet Tahilramani
Respondent Advocate(s)
- Samrat Vaish
- C P Singh Yadav
Official RERA Tribunal Orders (5)
The Tribunal set aside the Regulatory Authority's order and remanded the complaint to the Regulatory Authority, granting the appellant liberty to challenge the legality of the unit's cancellation order.
The Tribunal ordered the attachment of the respondent company's bank account to recover the appellant's deposit and interest, and issued a show-cause notice to Advocate Saghar Mehdi for professional misconduct, which was subsequently withdrawn following an unconditional apology.
The Tribunal closed the appellant's opportunity to file a reply to the respondent's objections due to non-compliance with a previous deadline and subsequently scheduled the matter for hearing on 25.01.2023.
The Tribunal granted an adjournment to the respondent to file supplementary objections, subject to a cost of Rs. 20,000/- to be paid to the appellant.
The Tribunal converted the defective appeal into a regular appeal and directed the respondent to file a reply to the grounds of appeal before the next hearing on 02.12.2021.
Need to research all rulings for gaursons realty private limited?
Extract builder dossiers, check execution status, and draft RERA appeal petitions in minutes using TathyaGrid.