Appellant / Complainant
U.P. Avas Evam Vikas Parishad
Respondent
Shobhit Chaturvedi
₹20,88,000
Respondent
Legal Issues & Claims Raised
Case Procedural History & Progression Tree
Visual step-by-step tree detailing dispute origin, interim hearings, and final tribunal ruling.
Complaint Filing & Dispute Registration
Complaint registered under Case ID 0901126021442021 by U.P. Avas Evam Vikas Parishad against Shobhit Chaturvedi before up_rera.
for delivery of Judgment/Order
The U.P. Real Estate Appellate Tribunal dismissed the appeal filed by U.P. Awas Evam Vikas Parishad, upholding the Adjudicating Officer's order to pay interest (MCLR+1%) to the allottee for delayed possession and directing the transfer of the appellant's pre-deposited amount to the U.P. RERA for execution.
to file objections and its reply
The Tribunal decided to proceed ex-parte against the respondent due to their failure to file objections or appear in court, and subsequently reserved judgment following arguments from the appellant.
to file objections and its reply
The Tribunal granted a final one-week extension to the respondent to file objections to the appeal and warned that the matter will proceed ex-parte if no objections are filed or if no one appears on the next date.
Delay condonation
The Tribunal condoned a 32-day delay in filing the appeal, citing Supreme Court guidelines regarding limitation extensions, and directed the Registry to convert the defective appeal into a regular appeal.
Delay condonation
The Tribunal granted an adjournment requested by the appellant's counsel and scheduled the matter for 11.05.2022 to consider the application for condonation of delay in an ex parte proceeding.
Delay condonation
The Tribunal closed the respondent's opportunity to file objections and ordered the matter to proceed ex parte due to failure to file a Vakalatnama and objections despite multiple extensions. The case is scheduled for 19.04.2022 to consider the application for condonation of delay.
Delay condonation
The Tribunal granted a 10-day extension to the respondent's counsel to file objections and vakalatnama due to health reasons and scheduled the next hearing for April 5, 2022.
Delay condonation
The Tribunal scheduled the matter for January 28, 2022, to hear arguments regarding the limitation application and the respondent's objection.
Defect Removal
The Tribunal noted the appellant's compliance with Section 43(5) of the Act and directed the respondent to file objections via email if they choose to do so before the next hearing on 10.01.2022.
Defect Removal
The Tribunal directed the applicant to file a Chartered Accountant certificate regarding compliance with Section 43(5) of the Act and scheduled the case for 07.12.2021 for disposal of the limitation application.
Defect Removal
The Tribunal granted an adjournment requested by the applicant's counsel due to illness and rescheduled the defective appeal for hearing on 16.11.2021.
Tribunal Order #0901126021442021-11-05-2022
The Tribunal condoned a 32-day delay in filing the appeal, citing Supreme Court guidelines regarding limitation extensions, and directed the Registry to convert the defective appeal into a regular appeal.
Tribunal Order #0901126021442021-05-04-2022
The Tribunal closed the respondent's opportunity to file objections and ordered the matter to proceed ex parte due to failure to file a Vakalatnama and objections despite multiple extensions. The case is scheduled for 19.04.2022 to consider the application for condonation of delay.
Tribunal Order #0901126021442021-08-09-2022
The U.P. Real Estate Appellate Tribunal dismissed the appeal filed by U.P. Awas Evam Vikas Parishad, upholding the Adjudicating Officer's order to pay interest (MCLR+1%) to the allottee for delayed possession and directing the transfer of the appellant's pre-deposited amount to the U.P. RERA for execution.
Tribunal Order #0901126021442021-26-07-2022
The Tribunal decided to proceed ex-parte against the respondent due to their failure to file objections or appear in court, and subsequently reserved judgment following arguments from the appellant.
Tribunal Disposal & Final Award Ruling
The U.P. Real Estate Appellate Tribunal dismissed the appeal filed by U.P. Awas Evam Vikas Parishad, upholding the Adjudicating Officer's order to pay interest (MCLR+1%) to the allottee for delayed possession and directing the transfer of the appellant's pre-deposited amount to the U.P. RERA for execution. Awarded in favor of Respondent. Awarded interest rate: MCLR+1 percent p.a..
Final Tribunal Order & Ruling Verdict Summary
Official Ruling Summary
The U.P. Real Estate Appellate Tribunal dismissed the appeal filed by U.P. Awas Evam Vikas Parishad, upholding the Adjudicating Officer's order to pay interest (MCLR+1%) to the allottee for delayed possession and directing the transfer of the appellant's pre-deposited amount to the U.P. RERA for execution.
Ruling Awarded To
Respondent
Awarded Interest Rate
MCLR+1 percent p.a.
Interest Period
30.08.2015 to 21.07.2017
Statutory Sections Cited (RERA Act 2016)
Appearing Legal Counsel & Advocates
Appellant Advocate(s)
- Anoop Kumar Asthana
- Akhand Pratap Singh
Respondent Advocate(s)
- Akhand Pratap Singh
Official RERA Tribunal Orders (4)
The Tribunal condoned a 32-day delay in filing the appeal, citing Supreme Court guidelines regarding limitation extensions, and directed the Registry to convert the defective appeal into a regular appeal.
The Tribunal closed the respondent's opportunity to file objections and ordered the matter to proceed ex parte due to failure to file a Vakalatnama and objections despite multiple extensions. The case is scheduled for 19.04.2022 to consider the application for condonation of delay.
The U.P. Real Estate Appellate Tribunal dismissed the appeal filed by U.P. Awas Evam Vikas Parishad, upholding the Adjudicating Officer's order to pay interest (MCLR+1%) to the allottee for delayed possession and directing the transfer of the appellant's pre-deposited amount to the U.P. RERA for execution.
The Tribunal decided to proceed ex-parte against the respondent due to their failure to file objections or appear in court, and subsequently reserved judgment following arguments from the appellant.
Need to research all rulings for a builder?
Extract builder dossiers, check execution status, and draft RERA appeal petitions in minutes using TathyaGrid.