Appellant / Complainant
Uppal Chadha Hi-Tech Developers Pvt. Ltd.
Respondent
Anil Dhar, Sujata Dhar
uppal chadha hi-tech developers pvt. ltd.
Respondent
Case Procedural History & Progression Tree
Visual step-by-step tree detailing dispute origin, interim hearings, and final tribunal ruling.
Complaint Filing & Dispute Registration
Complaint registered under Case ID 0901126020542024 by Uppal Chadha Hi-Tech Developers Pvt. Ltd. against Anil Dhar, Sujata Dhar before up_rera.
Delay condonation
The Tribunal rejected the appellant's application for condonation of delay due to lack of sufficient explanation and dismissed the appeal. Consequently, the Registrar was directed to initiate steps to redeem the amount deposited by the promoter and transfer it to RERA for release to the beneficiary.
Delay condonation
The Tribunal adjourned the appeal to 03.01.2025 and directed both parties to complete their pleadings in the interim.
Delay condonation
The Tribunal noted the absence of advocates due to a Bar Council resolution and no litigants appearing in person, subsequently adjourning the appeal to 05.12.2024.
Delay condonation
The Tribunal directed the appellant to upload a calculation sheet regarding Section 43(5) compliance within three days and ordered the respondent to file a reply within seven days.
Delay condonation
The Tribunal granted the appellant seven days to file a reply to the respondent's objection regarding compliance with Section 43(5) of the Act and scheduled the matter for hearing on 24.09.2024.
Delay condonation
The Tribunal issued notice to the respondents regarding the appeal and directed the applicant to serve the notice and appeal documents via speed-post and email, with the matter listed for orders on 22.08.2024.
Tribunal Order #0901126020542024-03-01-2025
The Tribunal rejected the appellant's application for condonation of delay due to lack of sufficient explanation and dismissed the appeal. Consequently, the Registrar was directed to initiate steps to redeem the amount deposited by the promoter and transfer it to RERA for release to the beneficiary.
Tribunal Order #0901126020542024-24-09-2024
The Tribunal directed the appellant to upload a calculation sheet regarding Section 43(5) compliance within three days and ordered the respondent to file a reply within seven days.
Tribunal Disposal & Final Award Ruling
The Tribunal rejected the appellant's application for condonation of delay due to lack of sufficient explanation and dismissed the appeal. Consequently, the Registrar was directed to initiate steps to redeem the amount deposited by the promoter and transfer it to RERA for release to the beneficiary. Awarded in favor of Respondent.
Final Tribunal Order & Ruling Verdict Summary
Official Ruling Summary
The Tribunal rejected the appellant's application for condonation of delay due to lack of sufficient explanation and dismissed the appeal. Consequently, the Registrar was directed to initiate steps to redeem the amount deposited by the promoter and transfer it to RERA for release to the beneficiary.
Ruling Awarded To
Respondent
Appearing Legal Counsel & Advocates
Appellant Advocate(s)
- Naveen Kumar Tiwari
Respondent Advocate(s)
- Prasoon Kumar Anjor
Official RERA Tribunal Orders (2)
The Tribunal rejected the appellant's application for condonation of delay due to lack of sufficient explanation and dismissed the appeal. Consequently, the Registrar was directed to initiate steps to redeem the amount deposited by the promoter and transfer it to RERA for release to the beneficiary.
The Tribunal directed the appellant to upload a calculation sheet regarding Section 43(5) compliance within three days and ordered the respondent to file a reply within seven days.
Need to research all rulings for uppal chadha hi-tech developers pvt. ltd.?
Extract builder dossiers, check execution status, and draft RERA appeal petitions in minutes using TathyaGrid.