Appellant / Complainant
Vinny Jain
Respondent
U.P. Real Estate Regulatory Authority, Wealth Clinic Private Limited
wealth clinic private limited
₹4,00,000
Appellant
Legal Issues & Claims Raised
Case Procedural History & Progression Tree
Visual step-by-step tree detailing dispute origin, interim hearings, and final tribunal ruling.
Complaint Filing & Dispute Registration
Complaint registered under Case ID 0901126020452021 by Vinny Jain against U.P. Real Estate Regulatory Authority, Wealth Clinic Private Limited before up_rera.
Further Hearing
The Tribunal set aside the previous order and directed the second respondent (real estate agent) to refund Rs 4 Lakhs plus interest to the appellant, along with Rs 25,000 in litigation costs, due to a breach of the agreement for sale.
Further Hearing
The appeal was noted to be wrongly listed for the current date and has been rescheduled for further hearing on 04.04.2025.
Hearing
The appeal was adjourned at the request of the appellant's counsel and is scheduled for a hearing on March 4, 2025.
Hearing
The Tribunal granted the respondent additional time to prepare arguments and scheduled the next hearing for 17.02.2025, noting that no further adjournments will be permitted.
Hearing
The Tribunal granted a request from the respondent's counsel to reschedule the hearing of the appeal to 23.01.2025.
Hearing
The Tribunal granted the respondent's counsel additional time to prepare his brief and scheduled the appeal for final arguments on January 20, 2025.
Hearing
The Tribunal noted the appellant's reply to the respondent's application and granted the respondent time to prepare for final arguments, scheduling the next hearing for 08.01.2025.
Hearing
The Tribunal granted a request for adjournment following opposition from the respondent and rescheduled the appeal hearing for December 3, 2024, noting that no further adjournments will be permitted.
Hearing
The Tribunal granted the appellant 10 days to file objections to the respondent's application dated 15.05.2022, with a subsequent 7-day window for the respondent to file a reply, and scheduled the next hearing for 07.11.2024.
Hearing
The Tribunal scheduled the appeal for a hearing on 27.09.2023 and directed that no further adjournments will be granted on that date.
Hearing
The Tribunal granted a final opportunity to the Respondent to present arguments, warning that failure to do so will result in their right to press the appeal being closed and the matter being decided based on available records.
Hearing
The Tribunal granted an adjournment requested by the respondent's counsel and rescheduled the appeal for orders/hearing on 26.07.2024.
Hearing
The Tribunal addressed a request regarding representation and permitted the appellant to argue the matter in person, scheduling the hearing for 29.04.2024.
Hearing
The Tribunal has ordered the appeal to be listed for a hearing on 28.03.2024.
Hearing
The Tribunal has adjourned the appeal to 01.03.2024 as the counsel for the appellant is on sanctioned leave.
Hearing
The Tribunal adjourned the proceedings because the counsels for both parties were on sanctioned leave, rescheduling the hearing for 25.07.2023.
Hearing
The Tribunal closed the respondent's opportunity to file objections due to their failure to comply with a previous deadline, while allowing them to argue the case based on existing records and legal issues.
Hearing
The Tribunal granted the respondent a final 10-day extension to file objections, warning that failure to do so will result in the matter proceeding ex-parte based on the available record.
For Order
The Tribunal granted the respondent 10 days to file objections to the grounds of appeal and directed the parties to exchange replies via email before the next hearing on January 25, 2023.
For Order
The Tribunal adjourned the proceedings to 29.11.2022 and directed the parties to exchange their pleadings in the interim.
For Order
The Tribunal granted the respondent a one-week extension to file objections and directed the parties to exchange soft copies via email and upload their respective filings to the e-portal before the next hearing on 31.10.2022.
Hearing
The Tribunal granted the appellant a one-week extension to file a reply to the respondent's objections and directed the submission of a soft copy via email, adjourning the matter to 22.09.2022.
Hearing
The Tribunal granted the respondent an extension of one week to file objections to the appeal and directed the exchange of electronic copies between the parties before the next hearing on 31.08.2022.
Hearing
The Tribunal granted a request for adjournment made by the respondent's counsel and rescheduled the hearing for August 8, 2022.
Hearing
The Tribunal granted a one-week extension to the respondent for filing objections to the grounds of appeal and scheduled the next hearing for 25.07.2022.
to file objections and its reply
The Tribunal granted the respondent 10 days to file objections to the appeal and directed the parties to exchange replies and documents via email before the next hearing on 06.07.2022.
to file objections and its reply
The Tribunal granted an adjournment and extended the deadline for the respondent to file objections to the grounds of appeal by 06.05.2022, with the next hearing scheduled for 16.05.2022.
to file objections and its reply
The Tribunal granted the respondent two weeks to file objections to the appeal and directed the parties to upload their respective pleadings to the e-portal before the next hearing on 22.04.2022.
Further Order
The Tribunal granted the respondent 10 days to file objections to the grounds of appeal and directed the parties to exchange replies and upload documents to the e-portal before the next hearing on 01.04.2022.
Further Order
The Tribunal directed the respondent to file a reply to the grounds of appeal within one week and scheduled the next hearing for January 6, 2022.
Delay condonation
The Tribunal condoned a 52-day delay in filing the appeal, citing the Supreme Court's extension of limitation periods due to COVID-19, and directed the registry to convert the defective appeal into a regular appeal.
Delay condonation
The Tribunal directed the respondent to file their Vakalat Nama and an objection against the limitation application within three days and scheduled the case for hearing on 16.11.2021.
Delay condonation
The Tribunal directed the issuance of notice to the respondent and established a timeline for the exchange of objections and replies via email and the e-portal regarding the application for condonation of delay.
Delay condonation
The Tribunal issued notice to the respondent regarding the application for condonation of delay and directed the parties to exchange pleadings via email and upload documents to the e-portal before the next hearing on 23.04.2021.
Tribunal Order #0901126020452021-04-04-2025
The Tribunal set aside the previous order and directed the second respondent (real estate agent) to refund Rs 4 Lakhs plus interest to the appellant, along with Rs 25,000 in litigation costs, due to a breach of the agreement for sale.
Tribunal Order #0901126020452021-26-07-2024
The Tribunal granted a final opportunity to the Respondent to present arguments, warning that failure to do so will result in their right to press the appeal being closed and the matter being decided based on available records.
Tribunal Order #0901126020452021-27-02-2023
The Tribunal granted the respondent a final 10-day extension to file objections, warning that failure to do so will result in the matter proceeding ex-parte based on the available record.
Tribunal Order #0901126020452021-17-09-2021
The Tribunal directed the issuance of notice to the respondent and established a timeline for the exchange of objections and replies via email and the e-portal regarding the application for condonation of delay.
Tribunal Order #0901126020452021-16-11-2021
The Tribunal condoned a 52-day delay in filing the appeal, citing the Supreme Court's extension of limitation periods due to COVID-19, and directed the registry to convert the defective appeal into a regular appeal.
Tribunal Order #0901126020452021-27-03-2023
The Tribunal closed the respondent's opportunity to file objections due to their failure to comply with a previous deadline, while allowing them to argue the case based on existing records and legal issues.
Tribunal Disposal & Final Award Ruling
The Tribunal set aside the previous order and directed the second respondent (real estate agent) to refund Rs 4 Lakhs plus interest to the appellant, along with Rs 25,000 in litigation costs, due to a breach of the agreement for sale. Awarded in favor of Appellant. Awarded interest rate: MCLR+1%.
Final Tribunal Order & Ruling Verdict Summary
Official Ruling Summary
The Tribunal set aside the previous order and directed the second respondent (real estate agent) to refund Rs 4 Lakhs plus interest to the appellant, along with Rs 25,000 in litigation costs, due to a breach of the agreement for sale.
Ruling Awarded To
Appellant
Awarded Interest Rate
MCLR+1%
Interest Period
till the date of payment
Statutory Sections Cited (RERA Act 2016)
Appearing Legal Counsel & Advocates
Appellant Advocate(s)
- V K S Bisen
Respondent Advocate(s)
- Saghar Mehdi
Official RERA Tribunal Orders (6)
The Tribunal set aside the previous order and directed the second respondent (real estate agent) to refund Rs 4 Lakhs plus interest to the appellant, along with Rs 25,000 in litigation costs, due to a breach of the agreement for sale.
The Tribunal granted a final opportunity to the Respondent to present arguments, warning that failure to do so will result in their right to press the appeal being closed and the matter being decided based on available records.
The Tribunal granted the respondent a final 10-day extension to file objections, warning that failure to do so will result in the matter proceeding ex-parte based on the available record.
The Tribunal directed the issuance of notice to the respondent and established a timeline for the exchange of objections and replies via email and the e-portal regarding the application for condonation of delay.
The Tribunal condoned a 52-day delay in filing the appeal, citing the Supreme Court's extension of limitation periods due to COVID-19, and directed the registry to convert the defective appeal into a regular appeal.
The Tribunal closed the respondent's opportunity to file objections due to their failure to comply with a previous deadline, while allowing them to argue the case based on existing records and legal issues.
Need to research all rulings for wealth clinic private limited?
Extract builder dossiers, check execution status, and draft RERA appeal petitions in minutes using TathyaGrid.