up_reraStatus: Completed
CASE ID: 0901126020332022

Appellant / Complainant

U.P. Awas Evam Vikas Parishad

VS

Respondent

Gaurav Dixit

Disposal Award

Respondent

TathyaGrid Legal Copilot: Automated procedural intelligence extracted from official RERA tribunal records.
Analyze in Workspace

Legal Issues & Claims Raised

Delay in PossessionDelay Compensation / InterestSale Deed & Title TransferJurisdiction & Maintainability

Case Procedural History & Progression Tree

Visual step-by-step tree detailing dispute origin, interim hearings, and final tribunal ruling.

25 Milestones
Filing Phase

Complaint Filing & Dispute Registration

Complaint registered under Case ID 0901126020332022 by U.P. Awas Evam Vikas Parishad against Gaurav Dixit before up_rera.

Delay in PossessionDelay Compensation / InterestSale Deed & Title TransferJurisdiction & Maintainability
2
Stage 107/05/2024

for delivery of Judgment/Order

The U.P. Real Estate Appellate Tribunal dismissed the appeals filed by U.P. Awas Evam Vikas Parishad, upholding the Regulatory Authority's orders for delayed possession and interest at MCLR+1%, and directed the transfer of the promoter's pre-deposited funds to the Authority for disbursement to the allottees.

3
Stage 201/04/2024

Hearing

The Tribunal heard arguments from the appellant regarding the interest rate calculation for delayed possession and has reserved its judgment.

4
Stage 326/02/2024

Hearing

The Tribunal granted an adjournment requested by the respondent's counsel due to a religious function and rescheduled the appeal for hearing on 01.04.2024.

5
Stage 417/01/2024

Hearing

The Tribunal granted an adjournment requested by the appellant's counsel and directed the respondent to file their objections within one week. The matter is scheduled for hearing on 26.02.2024.

6
Stage 513/10/2023

Hearing

No text available.

7
Stage 605/09/2023

Hearing

The Tribunal adjourned the proceedings due to a three-day strike called by the Bar Council of Uttar Pradesh and rescheduled the hearing for 13.10.2023.

8
Stage 713/07/2023

Hearing

The Tribunal adjourned the proceedings due to the absence of the respondent's counsel caused by heavy rain and rescheduled the hearing for 05.09.2023.

9
Stage 803/07/2023

Hearing

The Tribunal closed the respondent's opportunity to file objections due to failure to comply with previous orders and directed that the appeal be heard on 13.07.2023 based on the existing record.

10
Stage 920/04/2023

For Order

The Tribunal granted the respondent a final 10-day extension to file objections and directed the appellant to file a reply within one week of receipt.

11
Stage 1016/03/2023

For Order

The proceedings were adjourned due to a bereavement in the family of the respondent's counsel, with the matter rescheduled for orders on 20.04.2023.

12
Stage 1106/02/2023

For Order

The proceedings are adjourned because the counsel for the appellant is on sanctioned leave, and the matter is rescheduled for 16.03.2023.

13
Stage 1221/12/2022

Further Order

The Tribunal granted an adjournment following a request from the respondent's counsel and provided a final opportunity for the respondent to file objections to the delay condonation application and reply to the grounds of appeal.

14
Stage 1328/11/2022

Further Order

No text available.

15
Stage 1402/11/2022

Further Order

This text represents the header/caption of an appeal (APPEAL-219/2022) before the U.P. Real Estate Appellate Tribunal between U.P. Awas Evam Vikas Parishad and Gaurav Dixit, but it contains no substantive ruling or directive.

16
Stage 1527/09/2022

Further Order

The Tribunal adjourned the appeal due to the absence of parties and scheduled the matter for further orders on 02.11.2022.

17
Stage 1626/08/2022

Delay condonation

The Tribunal condoned the 65-day delay in filing the appeal, citing COVID-19 related relaxations granted by the Supreme Court, and directed the Registry to register the defective appeal as a regular appeal.

18
Stage 1715/07/2022

Hearing

The Tribunal directed the respondent's counsel to file a Vakalatnama and an objection to the delay condonation application within three days, scheduling the matter for August 26, 2022.

19
Stage 1824/05/2022

Delay condonation

The Tribunal granted the respondent 10 days to file objections to the application for condonation of delay and the grounds of appeal, scheduling the matter for hearing on 15.07.2022.

20
Stage 1928/04/2022

Defect Removal

The Tribunal issued notice to the respondent regarding an application for condonation of delay and directed the appellant to rectify defects in the index and annexures within one week.

21
Stage 20Final Ruling Order

Tribunal Order #0901126020332022-07-05-2024

The U.P. Real Estate Appellate Tribunal dismissed the appeals filed by U.P. Awas Evam Vikas Parishad, upholding the Regulatory Authority's orders for delayed possession and interest at MCLR+1%, and directed the transfer of the promoter's pre-deposited funds to the Authority for disbursement to the allottees.

22
Stage 21Interim Order

Tribunal Order #0901126020332022-28-04-2022

The Tribunal issued notice to the respondent regarding an application for condonation of delay and directed the appellant to rectify defects in the index and annexures within one week.

23
Stage 22Interim Order

Tribunal Order #0901126020332022-03-07-2023

The Tribunal closed the respondent's opportunity to file objections due to failure to comply with previous orders and directed that the appeal be heard on 13.07.2023 based on the existing record.

24
Stage 23Interim Order

Tribunal Order #0901126020332022-26-08-2022

The Tribunal condoned the 65-day delay in filing the appeal, citing COVID-19 related relaxations granted by the Supreme Court, and directed the Registry to register the defective appeal as a regular appeal.

Disposal Phase

Tribunal Disposal & Final Award Ruling

The U.P. Real Estate Appellate Tribunal dismissed the appeals filed by U.P. Awas Evam Vikas Parishad, upholding the Regulatory Authority's orders for delayed possession and interest at MCLR+1%, and directed the transfer of the promoter's pre-deposited funds to the Authority for disbursement to the allottees. Awarded in favor of Respondent. Awarded interest rate: MCLR+1%.

Disposal Winner: RespondentInterest Rate: MCLR+1%Status: Completed

Final Tribunal Order & Ruling Verdict Summary

Official Ruling Summary

The U.P. Real Estate Appellate Tribunal dismissed the appeals filed by U.P. Awas Evam Vikas Parishad, upholding the Regulatory Authority's orders for delayed possession and interest at MCLR+1%, and directed the transfer of the promoter's pre-deposited funds to the Authority for disbursement to the allottees.

Ruling Awarded To

Respondent

Awarded Interest Rate

MCLR+1%

Interest Period

from promised date till the date of delivery of possession along with OC/CC

Verified Tribunal DocumentationDownload Official Final Tribunal Order PDF

Statutory Sections Cited (RERA Act 2016)

Section 18(1)Section 11(4)(f)Section 17Section 3Section 79

Appearing Legal Counsel & Advocates

Appellant Advocate(s)

  • N N Pandey

Respondent Advocate(s)

  • Saghar Mehdi

Official RERA Tribunal Orders (4)

FINAL_ORDEROrder ID: 0901126020332022-07-05-2024

The U.P. Real Estate Appellate Tribunal dismissed the appeals filed by U.P. Awas Evam Vikas Parishad, upholding the Regulatory Authority's orders for delayed possession and interest at MCLR+1%, and directed the transfer of the promoter's pre-deposited funds to the Authority for disbursement to the allottees.

INTERIM_ORDEROrder ID: 0901126020332022-28-04-2022

The Tribunal issued notice to the respondent regarding an application for condonation of delay and directed the appellant to rectify defects in the index and annexures within one week.

INTERIM_ORDEROrder ID: 0901126020332022-03-07-2023

The Tribunal closed the respondent's opportunity to file objections due to failure to comply with previous orders and directed that the appeal be heard on 13.07.2023 based on the existing record.

INTERIM_ORDEROrder ID: 0901126020332022-26-08-2022

The Tribunal condoned the 65-day delay in filing the appeal, citing COVID-19 related relaxations granted by the Supreme Court, and directed the Registry to register the defective appeal as a regular appeal.

TathyaGrid RERA Intelligence AI

Need to research all rulings for a builder?

Extract builder dossiers, check execution status, and draft RERA appeal petitions in minutes using TathyaGrid.

Open AI Workspace →