Appellant / Complainant
Pardeep Kumar
Respondent
U.P. Awas Evam Vikas Parishad
Appellant
Legal Issues & Claims Raised
Case Procedural History & Progression Tree
Visual step-by-step tree detailing dispute origin, interim hearings, and final tribunal ruling.
Complaint Filing & Dispute Registration
Complaint registered under Case ID 0901126020042023 by Pardeep Kumar against U.P. Awas Evam Vikas Parishad before up_rera.
Hearing
The Appellate Tribunal set aside the Adjudicating Officer's rejection of the appellant's complaint and remanded the matter for a fresh decision after conducting an inquiry through a technical committee to investigate alleged structural deficiencies.
Delay condonation
The Tribunal condoned the delay in filing the appeal and directed the Registry to convert the defective appeal into a regular appeal, scheduling the hearing for 12.11.2024.
Delay condonation
The Tribunal listed the defective appeal for further hearing on 04.10.2024 to consider the application for condonation of delay.
Delay condonation
The Tribunal granted an adjournment requested by the respondent's counsel due to illness and scheduled the matter for consideration of the delay condonation application and final hearing on 13.09.2024, with a strict warning that no further adjournments will be permitted.
Delay condonation
The Tribunal adjourned the matter to 22.08.2024 to consider an application for condonation of delay and proceed with the final hearing.
Delay condonation
The Tribunal received an adjournment request from the appellant appearing in person and scheduled the defective appeal for orders/hearing on 24.07.2024.
Delay condonation
The Tribunal noted that pleadings have been exchanged and scheduled the defective appeal for consideration of a delay condonation application on 27.05.2024.
Delay condonation
The Tribunal granted the appellant one week to file a reply to the respondent's objections and scheduled the hearing for the application for condonation of delay on 25.04.2024.
Delay condonation
The Tribunal granted the respondent one week to file objections due to a filing error and directed that the appellant may reply within a week of receiving the soft copy of said objections.
Delay condonation
The Tribunal granted the respondent 10 days to file a vakalatnama and objections, after which the appellant may file a reply. The matter is scheduled for hearing on 20.02.2024.
Delay condonation
The Tribunal issued a fresh notice to the respondent due to the applicant's failure to comply with previous service directions and scheduled the matter for 04.10.2023 to consider the application for condonation of delay.
Delay condonation
The Tribunal granted the appellant one week to file an affidavit of service and rescheduled the hearing for the defective appeal to 23.08.2023.
Delay condonation
The Tribunal issued a notice to the respondent regarding an application for condonation of delay and directed the applicant to serve the respondent via speed-post and email.
Tribunal Order #0901126020042023-12-11-2024
The Appellate Tribunal set aside the Adjudicating Officer's rejection of the appellant's complaint and remanded the matter for a fresh decision after conducting an inquiry through a technical committee to investigate alleged structural deficiencies.
Tribunal Order #0901126020042023-04-10-2024
The Tribunal condoned the delay in filing the appeal and directed the Registry to convert the defective appeal into a regular appeal, scheduling the hearing for 12.11.2024.
Tribunal Disposal & Final Award Ruling
The Appellate Tribunal set aside the Adjudicating Officer's rejection of the appellant's complaint and remanded the matter for a fresh decision after conducting an inquiry through a technical committee to investigate alleged structural deficiencies. Awarded in favor of Appellant.
Final Tribunal Order & Ruling Verdict Summary
Official Ruling Summary
The Appellate Tribunal set aside the Adjudicating Officer's rejection of the appellant's complaint and remanded the matter for a fresh decision after conducting an inquiry through a technical committee to investigate alleged structural deficiencies.
Ruling Awarded To
Appellant
Statutory Sections Cited (RERA Act 2016)
Appearing Legal Counsel & Advocates
Appellant Advocate(s)
- A
- In Person
Respondent Advocate(s)
- Anurag Singh
- Harit Mishra
Official RERA Tribunal Orders (2)
The Appellate Tribunal set aside the Adjudicating Officer's rejection of the appellant's complaint and remanded the matter for a fresh decision after conducting an inquiry through a technical committee to investigate alleged structural deficiencies.
The Tribunal condoned the delay in filing the appeal and directed the Registry to convert the defective appeal into a regular appeal, scheduling the hearing for 12.11.2024.
Need to research all rulings for a builder?
Extract builder dossiers, check execution status, and draft RERA appeal petitions in minutes using TathyaGrid.