Appellant / Complainant
Uppal Chadha Hi-Tech Developers Pvt. Ltd.
Respondent
Sunil Kumar
uppal chadha hi-tech developers pvt. ltd.
Respondent
Case Procedural History & Progression Tree
Visual step-by-step tree detailing dispute origin, interim hearings, and final tribunal ruling.
Complaint Filing & Dispute Registration
Complaint registered under Case ID 0901126020032024 by Uppal Chadha Hi-Tech Developers Pvt. Ltd. against Sunil Kumar before up_rera.
for delivery of Judgment/Order
The Tribunal rejected the applicant's application for condonation of delay and subsequently dismissed the appeal, finding that the 665-day delay in instituting the appeal was willful and lacked satisfactory explanation.
Delay condonation
The Tribunal heard arguments regarding an application for condonation of delay and reserved its judgment on the matter.
Delay condonation
The Tribunal granted the appellant seven days to file a rejoinder to the respondent's objections and directed the matter to be listed for hearing on October 1, 2024.
Delay condonation
The Tribunal granted the respondent 10 days to file a Vakalatnama, objection, and delay condonation application, with a subsequent timeline set for the appellant's reply.
Delay condonation
The Tribunal acknowledged the appellant's deposit of Rs. 8,95,074/- under Section 43(5) and issued notice to the respondent, directing specific procedures for service of appeal documents and subsequent filing of objections and replies.
Tribunal Order #0901126020032024-19-07-2024
The Tribunal acknowledged the appellant's deposit of Rs. 8,95,074/- under Section 43(5) and issued notice to the respondent, directing specific procedures for service of appeal documents and subsequent filing of objections and replies.
Tribunal Order #0901126020032024-02-12-2024
The Tribunal rejected the applicant's application for condonation of delay and subsequently dismissed the appeal, finding that the 665-day delay in instituting the appeal was willful and lacked satisfactory explanation.
Tribunal Disposal & Final Award Ruling
The Tribunal rejected the applicant's application for condonation of delay and subsequently dismissed the appeal, finding that the 665-day delay in instituting the appeal was willful and lacked satisfactory explanation. Awarded in favor of Respondent.
Final Tribunal Order & Ruling Verdict Summary
Official Ruling Summary
The Tribunal rejected the applicant's application for condonation of delay and subsequently dismissed the appeal, finding that the 665-day delay in instituting the appeal was willful and lacked satisfactory explanation.
Ruling Awarded To
Respondent
Appearing Legal Counsel & Advocates
Appellant Advocate(s)
- Naveen Kumar Tiwari
Respondent Advocate(s)
- Sumit Sharma
Official RERA Tribunal Orders (2)
The Tribunal acknowledged the appellant's deposit of Rs. 8,95,074/- under Section 43(5) and issued notice to the respondent, directing specific procedures for service of appeal documents and subsequent filing of objections and replies.
The Tribunal rejected the applicant's application for condonation of delay and subsequently dismissed the appeal, finding that the 665-day delay in instituting the appeal was willful and lacked satisfactory explanation.
Need to research all rulings for uppal chadha hi-tech developers pvt. ltd.?
Extract builder dossiers, check execution status, and draft RERA appeal petitions in minutes using TathyaGrid.