Appellant / Complainant
U.P. Awas Evam Vikas Parishad
Respondent
Priyanka Singh
₹3,48,485
Partial
Legal Issues & Claims Raised
Case Procedural History & Progression Tree
Visual step-by-step tree detailing dispute origin, interim hearings, and final tribunal ruling.
Complaint Filing & Dispute Registration
Complaint registered under Case ID 0901126020022022 by U.P. Awas Evam Vikas Parishad against Priyanka Singh before up_rera.
Hearing
The Tribunal set aside the Adjudicating Officer's order and directed a mutual interest settlement: the promoter must pay delay interest to the allottee from the promised completion date until the dues were deposited, minus the interest owed by the allottee on outstanding dues.
Hearing
The Tribunal granted the Appellant (U.P. Avas Evam Vikas Parishad) additional time to file an affidavit regarding project timelines and possession details, scheduling the final hearing for November 20, 2024.
Hearing
The Tribunal granted an adjournment requested by the respondent's counsel and scheduled the appeal for hearing on 15.10.2024, to be heard alongside Cross Appeal No. 592/2022.
Hearing
The Tribunal granted an adjournment requested by the appellant's counsel and scheduled the appeal for orders/hearing on 02.08.2024.
Final Hearing
The Tribunal noted the appellant's application for amendment of grounds of appeal and directed that the respondent file objections within a week, scheduling the next hearing for July 11, 2024.
Final Hearing
The Tribunal granted a request for adjournment from both parties and rescheduled the appeal for hearing/orders on 14.05.2024.
Final Hearing
The Tribunal has rescheduled the hearing for Appeal-222/2022 and Appeal-592/2022 to 22.04.2024 following a joint request from the counsel for both parties.
Final Hearing
The Tribunal granted a request to club this appeal with Appeal No. 592/2022 and scheduled both matters for hearing on 02.04.2024.
Final Hearing
The Tribunal granted an adjournment requested by the appellant's counsel and scheduled the appeal for a hearing on March 5, 2024.
Final Hearing
The Tribunal allowed the appellant's application to amend the grounds of appeal (adding grounds Q to U) and established a timeline for filing amended copies and subsequent objections.
Final Hearing
The Tribunal granted the appellant one week to file an application for amending the grounds of appeal regarding the jurisdiction of the Adjudicating Officer, subject to a cost of Rs. 1/- and specific procedural requirements for electronic service of documents.
Final Hearing
The Tribunal granted an adjournment requested by the appellant's counsel due to him being out of station and rescheduled the matter for hearing on 09.08.2023.
Final Hearing
The Tribunal has ordered the adjournment of Appeal-222/2022 and directed it to be heard alongside the respondent's cross-appeal (Appeal No. 592/2022) on 29.05.2023.
Final Hearing
The Tribunal directed the appellant in Appeal No. 592/2022 to file a reply to the respondent's objections within 10 days and scheduled both related appeals for a joint hearing on 18.04.2023.
Final Hearing
This is a header/caption of an order from the U.P. Real Estate Appellate Tribunal regarding Appeal-222/2022 between U.P. Awas Evam Vikas Parishad and Priyanka Singh, dated 10.01.2023.
Final Hearing
The Tribunal granted an adjournment requested by the respondent's counsel and ordered that this appeal be listed alongside Appeal No. 492/2022 on January 10, 2023.
Final Hearing
The Tribunal granted an adjournment requested by the appellant's counsel and scheduled the appeal for a hearing on 21.12.2022, noting that pleadings are complete.
For Order
The Tribunal has scheduled the appeal for a final hearing on November 25, 2022.
Hearing
The Tribunal has adjourned the appeal to 20.10.2022 to be heard alongside Appeal No. 592/2022, following a joint request from the counsels of both parties.
Hearing
The Tribunal directed that Appeal No. 222/2022 be listed together with the respondent's cross-appeal (Appeal No. 592/2022) on 21.09.2022 and ordered the parties to exchange pleadings in the cross-appeal.
Hearing
The Tribunal accepted the Vakalatnama of Shri Saghar Mehdi as counsel for the respondent and adjourned the appeal to 13.09.2022 upon the joint request of both parties.
Hearing
The Tribunal granted three days to the respondent's counsel to file a Vakalatnama and directed the Registry to convert the defective appeal into a regular appeal upon confirmation of defect removal. The case is scheduled for hearing on 22.08.2022.
Notice
The Tribunal granted the respondent three days to upload objections to the appeal on the e-portal and allowed the appellant ten days to file a reply, scheduling the next hearing for August 1, 2022.
Notice
The Tribunal granted the respondent 15 days to file objections to the application for condonation of delay and the grounds of appeal, scheduling the matter for hearing on July 18, 2022.
Defect Removal
The Tribunal issued notice to the respondent after verifying that the appellant complied with Section 43(5) of the Act by depositing Rs. 8,44,327/- and provided specific instructions for service of process via speed-post and email.
Defect Removal
The Tribunal directed the appellant to rectify procedural defects in the memo of appeal, including providing the respondent's email ID and uploading a C.A. Certificate, and scheduled the matter for 05.05.2022.
Tribunal Order #0901126020022022-01-08-2022
The Tribunal granted three days to the respondent's counsel to file a Vakalatnama and directed the Registry to convert the defective appeal into a regular appeal upon confirmation of defect removal. The case is scheduled for hearing on 22.08.2022.
Tribunal Order #0901126020022022-20-11-2024
The Tribunal set aside the Adjudicating Officer's order and directed a mutual interest settlement: the promoter must pay delay interest to the allottee from the promised completion date until the dues were deposited, minus the interest owed by the allottee on outstanding dues.
Tribunal Order #0901126020022022-09-08-2023
The Tribunal granted the appellant one week to file an application for amending the grounds of appeal regarding the jurisdiction of the Adjudicating Officer, subject to a cost of Rs. 1/- and specific procedural requirements for electronic service of documents.
Tribunal Order #0901126020022022-05-05-2022
The Tribunal issued notice to the respondent after verifying that the appellant complied with Section 43(5) of the Act by depositing Rs. 8,44,327/- and provided specific instructions for service of process via speed-post and email.
Tribunal Disposal & Final Award Ruling
The Tribunal set aside the Adjudicating Officer's order and directed a mutual interest settlement: the promoter must pay delay interest to the allottee from the promised completion date until the dues were deposited, minus the interest owed by the allottee on outstanding dues. Awarded in favor of Partial.
Final Tribunal Order & Ruling Verdict Summary
Official Ruling Summary
The Tribunal set aside the Adjudicating Officer's order and directed a mutual interest settlement: the promoter must pay delay interest to the allottee from the promised completion date until the dues were deposited, minus the interest owed by the allottee on outstanding dues.
Ruling Awarded To
Partial
Interest Period
delay interest from 02.08.2015 till 19.02.2020; interest on outstanding dues from 17.10.2018 till 19.02.2020
Statutory Sections Cited (RERA Act 2016)
Appearing Legal Counsel & Advocates
Appellant Advocate(s)
- Anurag Singh
- Shikhar Srivastava
Respondent Advocate(s)
- Saghar Mehdi
- Shashi Kant Verma
Official RERA Tribunal Orders (4)
The Tribunal granted three days to the respondent's counsel to file a Vakalatnama and directed the Registry to convert the defective appeal into a regular appeal upon confirmation of defect removal. The case is scheduled for hearing on 22.08.2022.
The Tribunal set aside the Adjudicating Officer's order and directed a mutual interest settlement: the promoter must pay delay interest to the allottee from the promised completion date until the dues were deposited, minus the interest owed by the allottee on outstanding dues.
The Tribunal granted the appellant one week to file an application for amending the grounds of appeal regarding the jurisdiction of the Adjudicating Officer, subject to a cost of Rs. 1/- and specific procedural requirements for electronic service of documents.
The Tribunal issued notice to the respondent after verifying that the appellant complied with Section 43(5) of the Act by depositing Rs. 8,44,327/- and provided specific instructions for service of process via speed-post and email.
Need to research all rulings for a builder?
Extract builder dossiers, check execution status, and draft RERA appeal petitions in minutes using TathyaGrid.