Appellant / Complainant
Himalaya Realestate Pvt Ltd
Respondent
Anoop Shrivastava
himalaya realestate pvt ltd
Respondent
Case Procedural History & Progression Tree
Visual step-by-step tree detailing dispute origin, interim hearings, and final tribunal ruling.
Complaint Filing & Dispute Registration
Complaint registered under Case ID 0901126019942023 by Himalaya Realestate Pvt Ltd against Anoop Shrivastava before up_rera.
Delay condonation
The U.P. Real Estate Appellate Tribunal rejected the appellant's application for condonation of delay and dismissed the appeal, ruling that the negligence of the appellant's legal representative did not constitute sufficient cause to excuse the delay.
Delay condonation
The Tribunal has scheduled the defective appeal for consideration of the application for condonation of delay and a subsequent hearing on 16.04.2025.
Delay condonation
The Tribunal has scheduled the defective appeal for hearing on the application for condonation of delay on 19.03.2025, noting that no further adjournments will be granted.
Delay condonation
The Tribunal has granted a request from the parties to list the appeal for a hearing before the regular Bench on 18.02.2025.
For Order
The Tribunal granted the respondent one week to file objections to the appellant's interim relief application and directed both parties to submit a chart detailing delays in the completion and handing over of possession of the respective units.
Delay condonation
The Tribunal noted the respondent's decision not to press for the execution of any Recovery Certificate (R.C.) against the appellant and adjourned the appeal for hearing on 05.11.2024.
Delay condonation
The Tribunal refers the parties to a previously passed order dated in Appeal No. D 446/2023 for the current orders.
Delay condonation
The Tribunal granted the appellant one week to file a rejoinder to the respondent's objections and scheduled the next hearing for 20.08.2024.
Delay condonation
The Tribunal refers the parties to a previous order passed in Appeal No. D 446/2023 regarding the current matter.
Delay condonation
The Tribunal noted the absence of both parties and ordered the defective appeal to be listed on 29.05.2024 for consideration of the application for condonation of delay.
Delay condonation
The Tribunal granted an adjournment requested by the respondent's counsel due to illness and rescheduled the appeal for hearing on 23.05.2024.
Delay condonation
The Tribunal granted a final 10-day extension to the appellant to file a reply to the respondent's objections and scheduled the matter for hearing on 22.04.2024.
Delay condonation
The Tribunal granted the respondent's counsel 10 days to file a reply to the objections regarding the application for condonation of delay and the grounds of appeal, and scheduled the matter for hearing on 14.03.2024.
Delay condonation
The Tribunal verified the appellant's deposit of Rs. 3,03,351.90 in compliance with Section 43(5) of the Act and granted the appellant one week to file an application for condonation of delay.
Tribunal Order #0901126019942023-16-04-2025
The U.P. Real Estate Appellate Tribunal rejected the appellant's application for condonation of delay and dismissed the appeal, ruling that the negligence of the appellant's legal representative did not constitute sufficient cause to excuse the delay.
Tribunal Order #0901126019942023-03-07-2023
The Tribunal verified the appellant's deposit of Rs. 3,03,351.90 in compliance with Section 43(5) of the Act and granted the appellant one week to file an application for condonation of delay.
Tribunal Disposal & Final Award Ruling
The U.P. Real Estate Appellate Tribunal rejected the appellant's application for condonation of delay and dismissed the appeal, ruling that the negligence of the appellant's legal representative did not constitute sufficient cause to excuse the delay. Awarded in favor of Respondent.
Final Tribunal Order & Ruling Verdict Summary
Official Ruling Summary
The U.P. Real Estate Appellate Tribunal rejected the appellant's application for condonation of delay and dismissed the appeal, ruling that the negligence of the appellant's legal representative did not constitute sufficient cause to excuse the delay.
Ruling Awarded To
Respondent
Appearing Legal Counsel & Advocates
Appellant Advocate(s)
- Nilaya Gupta
Respondent Advocate(s)
- M.P. Sahai
Official RERA Tribunal Orders (2)
The U.P. Real Estate Appellate Tribunal rejected the appellant's application for condonation of delay and dismissed the appeal, ruling that the negligence of the appellant's legal representative did not constitute sufficient cause to excuse the delay.
The Tribunal verified the appellant's deposit of Rs. 3,03,351.90 in compliance with Section 43(5) of the Act and granted the appellant one week to file an application for condonation of delay.
Need to research all rulings for himalaya realestate pvt ltd?
Extract builder dossiers, check execution status, and draft RERA appeal petitions in minutes using TathyaGrid.