Appellant / Complainant
Lucknow Development Authority
Respondent
Sneh Lata, Rajesh Kumar
Respondent
Legal Issues & Claims Raised
Case Procedural History & Progression Tree
Visual step-by-step tree detailing dispute origin, interim hearings, and final tribunal ruling.
Complaint Filing & Dispute Registration
Complaint registered under Case ID 0901126019682021 by Lucknow Development Authority against Sneh Lata, Rajesh Kumar before up_rera.
Hearing
The Tribunal set aside the Adjudicating Officer's order due to lack of jurisdiction but ruled that the appellant-promoter is liable to pay delay interest at MCLR+1% per annum for the period from 05.05.2018 to 07.12.2018.
For Order
The Tribunal granted a request for adjournment on behalf of the appellant and scheduled the appeal for its next hearing on 11.02.2025, noting that no further adjournments will be permitted.
Hearing
The U.P. Real Estate Appellate Tribunal dismissed the appeal filed by the Lucknow Development Authority for want of prosecution due to the absence of legal representation.
Hearing
The Tribunal granted a one-week extension to the LDA's counsel to file her Vakalatnama and to the appellant to file a reply to the respondent's objections, with the matter scheduled for hearing on 21.04.2023.
For Order
The Tribunal granted an adjournment due to the appellant's counsel's illness and directed the appellant to file a physical copy of their reply to the respondent's objections within one week.
For Order
The Tribunal noted that pleadings have been exchanged and adjourned the matter to 02.01.2023 for hearing.
For Order
The Tribunal has scheduled the case for a hearing on December 1, 2022.
Part Heard
The Tribunal granted an adjournment requested by the appellant's counsel and scheduled the appeal for 02.11.2022 to consider the application for condonation of delay and proceed with the hearing.
Further Order
The Tribunal granted an adjournment request from the appellant's counsel and directed both parties to exchange pleadings before the next hearing scheduled for 26.09.2022.
Further Order
The Tribunal adjourned the matter due to the absence of the respondent and scheduled the next hearing for September 2, 2022.
Further Order
The Tribunal corrected a clerical error regarding the respondent's counsel and directed the appellant to file a replication/rejoinder before the next hearing date on 03.08.2022.
Further Order
The Tribunal directed the respondent's counsel to file a reply to the limitation application and serve a copy to the applicant via email before the next hearing.
for delivery of Judgment/Order
The Tribunal allowed the application for condonation of delay filed by Lucknow Development Authority, subject to a cost of Rs. 5,000, and directed the registry to register the defective appeal as a regular appeal.
Delay condonation
The Tribunal heard arguments regarding a limitation application and subsequently reserved the judgment for further consideration.
Compliance of section 43(5)
The Tribunal directed the respondent to file an objection to the limitation application within two weeks and scheduled the case for further orders on 15.12.2021.
Compliance of section 43(5)
The Tribunal issued a notice to the respondent via registered post and email and scheduled the matter for further orders on 22.11.2021.
Compliance of section 43(5)
The Tribunal directed the appellant to rectify registry defects, specifically regarding compliance with Section 43(5) of the Act, warning that failure to comply by the next hearing will result in dismissal of the case.
Defect Removal
The Tribunal granted the appellant a one-week extension to rectify registry defects, specifically regarding compliance with Section 43(5) of the Act, and scheduled the matter for April 2, 2021.
Tribunal Order #0901126019682021-11-02-2025
The Tribunal set aside the Adjudicating Officer's order due to lack of jurisdiction but ruled that the appellant-promoter is liable to pay delay interest at MCLR+1% per annum for the period from 05.05.2018 to 07.12.2018.
Tribunal Order #0901126019682021-05-03-2022
The Tribunal allowed the application for condonation of delay filed by Lucknow Development Authority, subject to a cost of Rs. 5,000, and directed the registry to register the defective appeal as a regular appeal.
Tribunal Order #0901126019682021-21-04-2023
The U.P. Real Estate Appellate Tribunal dismissed the appeal filed by the Lucknow Development Authority for want of prosecution due to the absence of legal representation.
Tribunal Order #0901126019682021-05-10-2021
The Tribunal directed the appellant to rectify registry defects, specifically regarding compliance with Section 43(5) of the Act, warning that failure to comply by the next hearing will result in dismissal of the case.
Tribunal Disposal & Final Award Ruling
The Tribunal set aside the Adjudicating Officer's order due to lack of jurisdiction but ruled that the appellant-promoter is liable to pay delay interest at MCLR+1% per annum for the period from 05.05.2018 to 07.12.2018. The U.P. Real Estate Appellate Tribunal dismissed the appeal filed by the Lucknow Development Authority for want of prosecution due to the absence of legal representation. Awarded in favor of Respondent. Awarded interest rate: MCLR+1% per annum.
Final Tribunal Order & Ruling Verdict Summary
Official Ruling Summary
The Tribunal set aside the Adjudicating Officer's order due to lack of jurisdiction but ruled that the appellant-promoter is liable to pay delay interest at MCLR+1% per annum for the period from 05.05.2018 to 07.12.2018. The U.P. Real Estate Appellate Tribunal dismissed the appeal filed by the Lucknow Development Authority for want of prosecution due to the absence of legal representation.
Ruling Awarded To
Respondent
Awarded Interest Rate
MCLR+1% per annum
Interest Period
05.05.2018 to 07.12.2018
Statutory Sections Cited (RERA Act 2016)
Appearing Legal Counsel & Advocates
Appellant Advocate(s)
- Abhishek Khare
Respondent Advocate(s)
- Amit Kumar
Official RERA Tribunal Orders (4)
The Tribunal set aside the Adjudicating Officer's order due to lack of jurisdiction but ruled that the appellant-promoter is liable to pay delay interest at MCLR+1% per annum for the period from 05.05.2018 to 07.12.2018.
The Tribunal allowed the application for condonation of delay filed by Lucknow Development Authority, subject to a cost of Rs. 5,000, and directed the registry to register the defective appeal as a regular appeal.
The U.P. Real Estate Appellate Tribunal dismissed the appeal filed by the Lucknow Development Authority for want of prosecution due to the absence of legal representation.
The Tribunal directed the appellant to rectify registry defects, specifically regarding compliance with Section 43(5) of the Act, warning that failure to comply by the next hearing will result in dismissal of the case.
Need to research all rulings for a builder?
Extract builder dossiers, check execution status, and draft RERA appeal petitions in minutes using TathyaGrid.