up_reraStatus: Completed
CASE ID: 0901126019542021

Appellant / Complainant

Lucknow Development Authority

VS

Respondent

Hemant Giri

Disposal Award

Partial

TathyaGrid Legal Copilot: Automated procedural intelligence extracted from official RERA tribunal records.
Analyze in Workspace

Legal Issues & Claims Raised

Delay in PossessionDelay Compensation / InterestJurisdiction & Maintainability

Case Procedural History & Progression Tree

Visual step-by-step tree detailing dispute origin, interim hearings, and final tribunal ruling.

45 Milestones
Filing Phase

Complaint Filing & Dispute Registration

Complaint registered under Case ID 0901126019542021 by Lucknow Development Authority against Hemant Giri before up_rera.

Delay in PossessionDelay Compensation / InterestJurisdiction & Maintainability
2
Stage 103/01/2025

For Order

The Tribunal quashed the Adjudicating Officer's order for lack of jurisdiction but directed the appellant to pay delay interest at MCLR+1% per annum for the period from 20.08.2013 to 27.11.2019.

3
Stage 223/09/2024

Hearing

The Tribunal heard arguments regarding an appeal by the Lucknow Development Authority against an order awarding delay interest compensation, and subsequently reserved judgment.

4
Stage 311/09/2024

Hearing

The Tribunal recorded the payment of costs by the applicant and directed the office to verify the payment of Rs. 6,000 towards UP REAT, with the matter listed for hearing on 23.09.2024.

5
Stage 403/09/2024

Hearing

The Tribunal noted the payment of costs totaling Rs. 12,000/- to be split between the Tribunal and the respondent, granting the appellant five days to file proof of payment.

6
Stage 528/08/2024

Hearing

The Tribunal noted the deposit of costs by the appellant and, upon joint request from counsel, adjourned the hearing of the defective appeal to 03.09.2024.

7
Stage 607/08/2024

Hearing

The Tribunal noted the appellant's failure to comply with a previous order dated 02.11.2022 regarding the payment of costs (Rs. 12,000/-) and granted the appellant 10 days to clarify the non-payment.

8
Stage 716/07/2024

Hearing

The Tribunal granted a joint request from both parties to list the appeal for orders or hearing on 07.08.2024.

9
Stage 816/05/2024

Hearing

No text available.

10
Stage 910/05/2024

Hearing

The Tribunal granted a request to list the defective appeal on 16.05.2024 to align with similar matters scheduled for that date.

11
Stage 1024/04/2024

Hearing

The Tribunal noted that pleadings have been exchanged and scheduled the defective appeal for orders or hearing on 10.05.2024.

12
Stage 1119/03/2024

Hearing

The Tribunal dismissed the respondent's application for recall of the order dated 23.01.2023 as withdrawn and scheduled the defective appeal for hearing on 24.04.2024.

13
Stage 1201/03/2024

Hearing

The Tribunal noted procedural deficiencies in the respondent's application for recall of the order dated 23.01.2024 and adjourned the matter to 19.03.2024 upon the counsel's request.

14
Stage 1323/01/2024

Hearing

The Tribunal closed the respondent's opportunity to file objections due to repeated failure to do so despite multiple extensions, directing that the hearing proceed based on existing records.

15
Stage 1419/10/2023

Hearing

No text available.

16
Stage 1513/09/2023

Hearing

No text available.

17
Stage 1625/07/2023

Hearing

No text available.

18
Stage 1712/05/2023

Hearing

No text available.

19
Stage 1831/03/2023

Hearing

The Tribunal directed the respondent to file objections within 10 days and noted that the previous condonation of delay remains technically incomplete as the required costs have not yet been fully paid/received.

20
Stage 1920/02/2023

For Order

The Tribunal noted the appellant's failure to comply with the cost payment condition for condoning delay and directed the respondent to file objections within 10 days, followed by a reply from the appellant.

21
Stage 2018/01/2023

For Order

No text available.

22
Stage 2113/12/2022

For Order

No text available.

23
Stage 2224/11/2022

For Order

Upon a joint request from the counsels for both parties, the tribunal has adjourned the defective appeal to 13.12.2022.

24
Stage 2302/11/2022

for delivery of Judgment/Order

The Tribunal allowed the application for condonation of delay filed by Lucknow Development Authority, subject to a cost of Rs. 12,000, and directed the defective appeal to be registered as a Regular Appeal.

25
Stage 2424/03/2022

Hearing

The Tribunal heard arguments regarding the point of limitation and reserved its judgment on that specific issue.

26
Stage 2525/02/2022

Delay condonation

The Tribunal granted the respondent a one-week extension to file objections to the application for condonation of delay and the grounds of appeal, with subsequent timelines set for the applicant's reply.

27
Stage 2617/01/2022

Delay condonation

No text available.

28
Stage 2715/12/2021

Delay condonation

The Tribunal directed the respondent to file objections against the appellant's limitation application and scheduled the matter for 17.01.2022 to dispose of said application.

29
Stage 2822/11/2021

Compliance of section 43(5)

The Tribunal directed the respondent to file a Vakalatnama within two days and submit objections against the application for condonation of delay by the next hearing on 15.12.2021.

30
Stage 2925/10/2021

Compliance of section 43(5)

The Tribunal noted the appellant's compliance with Section 43(5) regarding the deposit of required funds and ordered notice to be issued to the respondent via registered post and e-mail.

31
Stage 3005/10/2021

Compliance of section 43(5)

The Tribunal adjourned the case to 25.10.2021 and directed the appellant to rectify registry defects, specifically mandating compliance with Section 43(5) of the Act or face dismissal for non-compliance.

32
Stage 3119/04/2021

Compliance of section 43(5)

No text available.

33
Stage 3202/04/2021

Defect Removal

No text available.

34
Stage 3322/03/2021

Defect Removal

The Tribunal granted the appellant a one-week extension to rectify registry defects, specifically regarding compliance with Section 43(5) of the Act, and rescheduled the matter for April 2, 2021.

35
Stage 34Final Ruling Order

Tribunal Order #0901126019542021-03-01-2025

The Tribunal quashed the Adjudicating Officer's order for lack of jurisdiction but directed the appellant to pay delay interest at MCLR+1% per annum for the period from 20.08.2013 to 27.11.2019.

36
Stage 35Interim Order

Tribunal Order #0901126019542021-03-09-2024

The Tribunal noted the payment of costs totaling Rs. 12,000/- to be split between the Tribunal and the respondent, granting the appellant five days to file proof of payment.

37
Stage 36Interim Order

Tribunal Order #0901126019542021-23-01-2024

The Tribunal closed the respondent's opportunity to file objections due to repeated failure to do so despite multiple extensions, directing that the hearing proceed based on existing records.

38
Stage 37Interim Order

Tribunal Order #0901126019542021-31-03-2023

The Tribunal directed the respondent to file objections within 10 days and noted that the previous condonation of delay remains technically incomplete as the required costs have not yet been fully paid/received.

39
Stage 38Interim Order

Tribunal Order #0901126019542021-20-02-2023

The Tribunal noted the appellant's failure to comply with the cost payment condition for condoning delay and directed the respondent to file objections within 10 days, followed by a reply from the appellant.

40
Stage 39Interim Order

Tribunal Order #0901126019542021-02-11-2022

The Tribunal allowed the application for condonation of delay filed by Lucknow Development Authority, subject to a cost of Rs. 12,000, and directed the defective appeal to be registered as a Regular Appeal.

41
Stage 40Interim Order

Tribunal Order #0901126019542021-23-09-2024

The Tribunal heard arguments regarding an appeal by the Lucknow Development Authority against an order awarding delay interest compensation, and subsequently reserved judgment.

42
Stage 41Interim Order

Tribunal Order #0901126019542021-11-09-2024

The Tribunal recorded the payment of costs by the applicant and directed the office to verify the payment of Rs. 6,000 towards UP REAT, with the matter listed for hearing on 23.09.2024.

43
Stage 42Interim Order

Tribunal Order #0901126019542021-07-08-2024

The Tribunal noted the appellant's failure to comply with a previous order dated 02.11.2022 regarding the payment of costs (Rs. 12,000/-) and granted the appellant 10 days to clarify the non-payment.

44
Stage 43Interim Order

Tribunal Order #0901126019542021-05-10-2021

The Tribunal adjourned the case to 25.10.2021 and directed the appellant to rectify registry defects, specifically mandating compliance with Section 43(5) of the Act or face dismissal for non-compliance.

Disposal Phase

Tribunal Disposal & Final Award Ruling

The Tribunal quashed the Adjudicating Officer's order for lack of jurisdiction but directed the appellant to pay delay interest at MCLR+1% per annum for the period from 20.08.2013 to 27.11.2019. Awarded in favor of Partial. Awarded interest rate: MCLR+1% per annum.

Disposal Winner: PartialInterest Rate: MCLR+1% per annumStatus: Completed

Final Tribunal Order & Ruling Verdict Summary

Official Ruling Summary

The Tribunal quashed the Adjudicating Officer's order for lack of jurisdiction but directed the appellant to pay delay interest at MCLR+1% per annum for the period from 20.08.2013 to 27.11.2019.

Ruling Awarded To

Partial

Awarded Interest Rate

MCLR+1% per annum

Interest Period

20.08.2013 to 27.11.2019

Verified Tribunal DocumentationDownload Official Final Tribunal Order PDF

Statutory Sections Cited (RERA Act 2016)

Section 18(1)Section 3Section 79

Appearing Legal Counsel & Advocates

Appellant Advocate(s)

  • Shruti Sahu

Respondent Advocate(s)

  • Rahul Kapoor

Official RERA Tribunal Orders (10)

FINAL_ORDEROrder ID: 0901126019542021-03-01-2025

The Tribunal quashed the Adjudicating Officer's order for lack of jurisdiction but directed the appellant to pay delay interest at MCLR+1% per annum for the period from 20.08.2013 to 27.11.2019.

INTERIM_ORDEROrder ID: 0901126019542021-03-09-2024

The Tribunal noted the payment of costs totaling Rs. 12,000/- to be split between the Tribunal and the respondent, granting the appellant five days to file proof of payment.

INTERIM_ORDEROrder ID: 0901126019542021-23-01-2024

The Tribunal closed the respondent's opportunity to file objections due to repeated failure to do so despite multiple extensions, directing that the hearing proceed based on existing records.

INTERIM_ORDEROrder ID: 0901126019542021-31-03-2023

The Tribunal directed the respondent to file objections within 10 days and noted that the previous condonation of delay remains technically incomplete as the required costs have not yet been fully paid/received.

INTERIM_ORDEROrder ID: 0901126019542021-20-02-2023

The Tribunal noted the appellant's failure to comply with the cost payment condition for condoning delay and directed the respondent to file objections within 10 days, followed by a reply from the appellant.

INTERIM_ORDEROrder ID: 0901126019542021-02-11-2022

The Tribunal allowed the application for condonation of delay filed by Lucknow Development Authority, subject to a cost of Rs. 12,000, and directed the defective appeal to be registered as a Regular Appeal.

INTERIM_ORDEROrder ID: 0901126019542021-23-09-2024

The Tribunal heard arguments regarding an appeal by the Lucknow Development Authority against an order awarding delay interest compensation, and subsequently reserved judgment.

INTERIM_ORDEROrder ID: 0901126019542021-11-09-2024

The Tribunal recorded the payment of costs by the applicant and directed the office to verify the payment of Rs. 6,000 towards UP REAT, with the matter listed for hearing on 23.09.2024.

INTERIM_ORDEROrder ID: 0901126019542021-07-08-2024

The Tribunal noted the appellant's failure to comply with a previous order dated 02.11.2022 regarding the payment of costs (Rs. 12,000/-) and granted the appellant 10 days to clarify the non-payment.

INTERIM_ORDEROrder ID: 0901126019542021-05-10-2021

The Tribunal adjourned the case to 25.10.2021 and directed the appellant to rectify registry defects, specifically mandating compliance with Section 43(5) of the Act or face dismissal for non-compliance.

TathyaGrid RERA Intelligence AI

Need to research all rulings for a builder?

Extract builder dossiers, check execution status, and draft RERA appeal petitions in minutes using TathyaGrid.

Open AI Workspace →