up_reraStatus: Completed
CASE ID: 0901126019482021

Appellant / Complainant

Lucknow Development Authority

VS

Respondent

Shashi Prakash Dwivedi

Disposal Award

Respondent

TathyaGrid Legal Copilot: Automated procedural intelligence extracted from official RERA tribunal records.
Analyze in Workspace

Legal Issues & Claims Raised

Delay in PossessionDelay Compensation / InterestSale Deed & Title Transfer

Case Procedural History & Progression Tree

Visual step-by-step tree detailing dispute origin, interim hearings, and final tribunal ruling.

24 Milestones
Filing Phase

Complaint Filing & Dispute Registration

Complaint registered under Case ID 0901126019482021 by Lucknow Development Authority against Shashi Prakash Dwivedi before up_rera.

Delay in PossessionDelay Compensation / InterestSale Deed & Title Transfer
2
Stage 122/09/2023

Hearing

The Appellate Tribunal dismissed the appeal filed by Lucknow Development Authority, upholding the Regulatory Authority's order to grant possession and pay interest at MCLR+1% p.a. for delayed possession, and directed the transfer of the promoter's pre-deposited amount to the U.P. RERA for disbursement.

3
Stage 207/08/2023

Hearing

No text available.

4
Stage 325/05/2023

Hearing

No text available.

5
Stage 403/05/2023

Hearing

The Tribunal adjourned the matter to 25.05.2023 and directed the Appellant to explain why previously imposed costs for condoning delay have not been paid, warning that failure to pay will result in the recall of the condonation order.

6
Stage 522/03/2023

Hearing

No text available.

7
Stage 616/03/2023

Hearing

The Tribunal noted a clerical error regarding the execution of a sale deed in the appeal memo and adjourned the matter to 22.03.2023 to allow the appellant counsel more time to prepare her brief.

8
Stage 717/02/2023

Hearing

The Tribunal granted a request for adjournment due to the new counsel's need for preparation and the respondent's personal difficulties, rescheduling the hearing for 16.03.2023.

9
Stage 807/02/2023

Hearing

The Tribunal granted an adjournment to the appellant due to the counsel's health issues, while noting that the counsel's resignation from the authority's panel does not affect his standing as long as the Vakalatnama remains on record.

10
Stage 931/01/2023

Hearing

The Tribunal adjourned the proceedings due to counsel's absence but directed the appellant to pay the outstanding cost of Rs. 3,000/- owed to the respondent from a previous order before the next hearing on 07.02.2023.

11
Stage 1021/12/2022

Hearing

The Tribunal adjourned the defective appeal to 31.01.2023 for further orders due to the absence of the respondent.

12
Stage 1109/12/2021

Further Order

The Tribunal heard arguments regarding an appeal by the Lucknow Development Authority concerning interest on delayed possession and reserved its judgment.

13
Stage 1217/11/2021

Compliance of section 43(5)

The Tribunal condoned the 385-day delay in filing the appeal by applying COVID-19 pandemic relaxation rules, allowing the case to proceed on merit subject to a cost of Rs. 5000/- payable to the respondent and the Tribunal fund.

14
Stage 1325/10/2021

Compliance of section 43(5)

The Tribunal issued notice to the respondent via registered post and e-mail and scheduled the matter for further orders on 22.11.2021.

15
Stage 1405/10/2021

Compliance of section 43(5)

The Tribunal directed the appellant to rectify registry defects, specifically regarding compliance with Section 43(5) of the Act, warning that failure to comply by the next hearing will result in dismissal of the case.

16
Stage 1519/04/2021

Compliance of section 43(5)

No text available.

17
Stage 1602/04/2021

Defect Removal

No text available.

18
Stage 1722/03/2021

Defect Removal

The Tribunal granted the appellant a one-week extension to rectify registry defects, specifically regarding compliance with Section 43(5) of the Act, and scheduled the matter for hearing on 02.04.2021.

19
Stage 18Interim Order

Tribunal Order #0901126019482021-05-10-2021

The Tribunal directed the appellant to rectify registry defects, specifically regarding compliance with Section 43(5) of the Act, warning that failure to comply by the next hearing will result in dismissal of the case.

20
Stage 19Final Ruling Order

Tribunal Order #0901126019482021-22-09-2023

The Appellate Tribunal dismissed the appeal filed by Lucknow Development Authority, upholding the Regulatory Authority's order to grant possession and pay interest at MCLR+1% p.a. for delayed possession, and directed the transfer of the promoter's pre-deposited amount to the U.P. RERA for disbursement.

21
Stage 20Interim Order

Tribunal Order #0901126019482021-17-11-2021

The Tribunal condoned the 385-day delay in filing the appeal by applying COVID-19 pandemic relaxation rules, allowing the case to proceed on merit subject to a cost of Rs. 5000/- payable to the respondent and the Tribunal fund.

22
Stage 21Interim Order

Tribunal Order #0901126019482021-31-01-2023

The Tribunal adjourned the proceedings due to counsel's absence but directed the appellant to pay the outstanding cost of Rs. 3,000/- owed to the respondent from a previous order before the next hearing on 07.02.2023.

23
Stage 22Interim Order

Tribunal Order #0901126019482021-03-05-2023

The Tribunal adjourned the matter to 25.05.2023 and directed the Appellant to explain why previously imposed costs for condoning delay have not been paid, warning that failure to pay will result in the recall of the condonation order.

Disposal Phase

Tribunal Disposal & Final Award Ruling

The Appellate Tribunal dismissed the appeal filed by Lucknow Development Authority, upholding the Regulatory Authority's order to grant possession and pay interest at MCLR+1% p.a. for delayed possession, and directed the transfer of the promoter's pre-deposited amount to the U.P. RERA for disbursement. Awarded in favor of Respondent. Awarded interest rate: MCLR + 1% p.a..

Disposal Winner: RespondentInterest Rate: MCLR + 1% p.a.Status: Completed

Final Tribunal Order & Ruling Verdict Summary

Official Ruling Summary

The Appellate Tribunal dismissed the appeal filed by Lucknow Development Authority, upholding the Regulatory Authority's order to grant possession and pay interest at MCLR+1% p.a. for delayed possession, and directed the transfer of the promoter's pre-deposited amount to the U.P. RERA for disbursement.

Ruling Awarded To

Respondent

Awarded Interest Rate

MCLR + 1% p.a.

Interest Period

from 30.08.2015 till the date of offer of possession i.e. 09.08.2019

Verified Tribunal DocumentationDownload Official Final Tribunal Order PDF

Statutory Sections Cited (RERA Act 2016)

Section 18(1)Section 11(4)(f)Section 17

Appearing Legal Counsel & Advocates

Appellant Advocate(s)

  • Abhishek Khare

Respondent Advocate(s)

  • Respondent In-Person

Official RERA Tribunal Orders (5)

INTERIM_ORDEROrder ID: 0901126019482021-05-10-2021

The Tribunal directed the appellant to rectify registry defects, specifically regarding compliance with Section 43(5) of the Act, warning that failure to comply by the next hearing will result in dismissal of the case.

FINAL_ORDEROrder ID: 0901126019482021-22-09-2023

The Appellate Tribunal dismissed the appeal filed by Lucknow Development Authority, upholding the Regulatory Authority's order to grant possession and pay interest at MCLR+1% p.a. for delayed possession, and directed the transfer of the promoter's pre-deposited amount to the U.P. RERA for disbursement.

INTERIM_ORDEROrder ID: 0901126019482021-17-11-2021

The Tribunal condoned the 385-day delay in filing the appeal by applying COVID-19 pandemic relaxation rules, allowing the case to proceed on merit subject to a cost of Rs. 5000/- payable to the respondent and the Tribunal fund.

INTERIM_ORDEROrder ID: 0901126019482021-31-01-2023

The Tribunal adjourned the proceedings due to counsel's absence but directed the appellant to pay the outstanding cost of Rs. 3,000/- owed to the respondent from a previous order before the next hearing on 07.02.2023.

INTERIM_ORDEROrder ID: 0901126019482021-03-05-2023

The Tribunal adjourned the matter to 25.05.2023 and directed the Appellant to explain why previously imposed costs for condoning delay have not been paid, warning that failure to pay will result in the recall of the condonation order.

TathyaGrid RERA Intelligence AI

Need to research all rulings for a builder?

Extract builder dossiers, check execution status, and draft RERA appeal petitions in minutes using TathyaGrid.

Open AI Workspace →