Appellant / Complainant
Lucknow Development Authority
Respondent
Shaileshwar Nath Singh
Respondent
Case Procedural History & Progression Tree
Visual step-by-step tree detailing dispute origin, interim hearings, and final tribunal ruling.
Complaint Filing & Dispute Registration
Complaint registered under Case ID 0901126019472021 by Lucknow Development Authority against Shaileshwar Nath Singh before up_rera.
for delivery of Judgment/Order
The U.P. Real Estate Appellate Tribunal rejected the application for condonation of delay filed by the Lucknow Development Authority and consequently dismissed Appeal No. 260/2021, finding the explanation for the 141-day delay to be fictitious and concocted.
Compliance of section 43(5)
The Tribunal heard arguments regarding a limitation application and reserved its judgment on the issue of limitation.
Compliance of section 43(5)
The Tribunal noted the appellant's compliance with Section 43(5) regarding deposit requirements and directed the respondent to file objections before the next hearing on 22.11.2021.
Compliance of section 43(5)
The Tribunal directed the appellant to rectify registry defects, specifically regarding compliance with Section 43(5) of the Act, warning that failure to comply by the next hearing date will result in dismissal of the appeal.
Defect Removal
The Tribunal granted the appellant a one-week extension to rectify registry defects, specifically regarding compliance with Section 43(5) of the Act, and scheduled the matter for April 2, 2021.
Tribunal Order #0901126019472021-24-02-2022
The U.P. Real Estate Appellate Tribunal rejected the application for condonation of delay filed by the Lucknow Development Authority and consequently dismissed Appeal No. 260/2021, finding the explanation for the 141-day delay to be fictitious and concocted.
Tribunal Order #0901126019472021-05-10-2021
The Tribunal directed the appellant to rectify registry defects, specifically regarding compliance with Section 43(5) of the Act, warning that failure to comply by the next hearing date will result in dismissal of the appeal.
Tribunal Disposal & Final Award Ruling
The U.P. Real Estate Appellate Tribunal rejected the application for condonation of delay filed by the Lucknow Development Authority and consequently dismissed Appeal No. 260/2021, finding the explanation for the 141-day delay to be fictitious and concocted. Awarded in favor of Respondent.
Final Tribunal Order & Ruling Verdict Summary
Official Ruling Summary
The U.P. Real Estate Appellate Tribunal rejected the application for condonation of delay filed by the Lucknow Development Authority and consequently dismissed Appeal No. 260/2021, finding the explanation for the 141-day delay to be fictitious and concocted.
Ruling Awarded To
Respondent
Appearing Legal Counsel & Advocates
Appellant Advocate(s)
- Amit Yadav
Official RERA Tribunal Orders (2)
The U.P. Real Estate Appellate Tribunal rejected the application for condonation of delay filed by the Lucknow Development Authority and consequently dismissed Appeal No. 260/2021, finding the explanation for the 141-day delay to be fictitious and concocted.
The Tribunal directed the appellant to rectify registry defects, specifically regarding compliance with Section 43(5) of the Act, warning that failure to comply by the next hearing date will result in dismissal of the appeal.
Need to research all rulings for a builder?
Extract builder dossiers, check execution status, and draft RERA appeal petitions in minutes using TathyaGrid.