Appellant / Complainant
Gunjan Kumar Sharma
Respondent
Greater Noida Industrial Development Authority
Respondent
Legal Issues & Claims Raised
Case Procedural History & Progression Tree
Visual step-by-step tree detailing dispute origin, interim hearings, and final tribunal ruling.
Complaint Filing & Dispute Registration
Complaint registered under Case ID 0901126019332021 by Gunjan Kumar Sharma against Greater Noida Industrial Development Authority before up_rera.
Notice
The Tribunal rejected the applicant's application for condonation of delay of 551 days and consequently dismissed the appeal, ruling that seeking an enhancement of interest based on a High Court judgment in a different case did not constitute 'sufficient cause'.
Hearing
The Tribunal directed the respondent to file objections within 10 days and instructed both parties to upload documents to the e-portal before the next hearing on 25.11.2021.
Hearing
The Tribunal adjourned the matter due to the non-appearance of the respondent and directed that notices be issued to the parties via email for the next hearing on 09.11.2021.
Delay condonation
The Tribunal issued a notice to the respondent via registered post and email and scheduled the matter for further orders on 20.04.2021.
Tribunal Order #0901126019332021-20-12-2021
The Tribunal rejected the applicant's application for condonation of delay of 551 days and consequently dismissed the appeal, ruling that seeking an enhancement of interest based on a High Court judgment in a different case did not constitute 'sufficient cause'.
Tribunal Disposal & Final Award Ruling
The Tribunal rejected the applicant's application for condonation of delay of 551 days and consequently dismissed the appeal, ruling that seeking an enhancement of interest based on a High Court judgment in a different case did not constitute 'sufficient cause'. Awarded in favor of Respondent.
Final Tribunal Order & Ruling Verdict Summary
Official Ruling Summary
The Tribunal rejected the applicant's application for condonation of delay of 551 days and consequently dismissed the appeal, ruling that seeking an enhancement of interest based on a High Court judgment in a different case did not constitute 'sufficient cause'.
Ruling Awarded To
Respondent
Statutory Sections Cited (RERA Act 2016)
Appearing Legal Counsel & Advocates
Appellant Advocate(s)
- Sunil Kumar Chaudhary
Respondent Advocate(s)
- Rajesh Chaddha
Official RERA Tribunal Orders (1)
The Tribunal rejected the applicant's application for condonation of delay of 551 days and consequently dismissed the appeal, ruling that seeking an enhancement of interest based on a High Court judgment in a different case did not constitute 'sufficient cause'.
Need to research all rulings for a builder?
Extract builder dossiers, check execution status, and draft RERA appeal petitions in minutes using TathyaGrid.