up_reraStatus: Completed
CASE ID: 0901126018942023

Appellant / Complainant

Himalaya Realestate Pvt Ltd

VS

Respondent

Mayank Pratap Singh

Developer Firm

himalaya realestate pvt ltd

Disposal Award

Respondent

TathyaGrid Legal Copilot: Automated procedural intelligence extracted from official RERA tribunal records.
Analyze in Workspace

Case Procedural History & Progression Tree

Visual step-by-step tree detailing dispute origin, interim hearings, and final tribunal ruling.

22 Milestones
Filing Phase

Complaint Filing & Dispute Registration

Complaint registered under Case ID 0901126018942023 by Himalaya Realestate Pvt Ltd against Mayank Pratap Singh before up_rera.

2
Stage 116/04/2025

Delay condonation

The U.P. Real Estate Appellate Tribunal rejected the appellant's application for condonation of delay and dismissed the appeal, ruling that the failure of the legal representative to inform the promoter did not constitute sufficient cause to excuse the delay.

3
Stage 219/03/2025

Delay condonation

The Tribunal granted a request by the appellant's counsel to list the defective appeal for consideration of the application for condonation of delay on 16.04.2025.

4
Stage 318/02/2025

Delay condonation

The Tribunal has scheduled the defective appeal for hearing on 19.03.2025 to dispose of the application for condonation of delay, noting that no further adjournments will be granted.

5
Stage 424/01/2025

Delay condonation

At the request of the parties, the Tribunal has adjourned the appeal to be listed for hearing on 18.02.2025 before the regular Bench.

6
Stage 502/01/2025

For Order

The Tribunal directed the parties to submit a chart detailing delays in the completion and handing over of possession of the respective units and scheduled the matter for hearing on 24.01.2025.

7
Stage 605/11/2024

Delay condonation

No text available.

8
Stage 723/09/2024

Delay condonation

The Tribunal noted the respondent's statement that they are not pressing for the execution of any R.C. issued against the appellant and adjourned the matter to 05.11.2024 at the request of the parties.

9
Stage 820/08/2024

Delay condonation

The Tribunal refers the parties to a previous order passed in Appeal No. D 446/2023 regarding the current matter.

10
Stage 926/07/2024

Delay condonation

The Tribunal granted the appellant one week's time to file a rejoinder to the respondent's objections and scheduled the next hearing for August 20, 2024.

11
Stage 1029/05/2024

Delay condonation

The order refers the parties to a previous order passed in Appeal No. D 446/2023 for directions.

12
Stage 1123/05/2024

Delay condonation

The Tribunal noted the absence of both parties and ordered the defective appeal to be listed on 29.05.2024 for consideration of the application for condonation of delay.

13
Stage 1222/04/2024

Delay condonation

The Tribunal granted an adjournment requested by the respondent's counsel due to illness and rescheduled the appeal for hearing on 23.05.2024.

14
Stage 1301/04/2024

Delay condonation

The Tribunal granted the appellant 10 days to file a reply to the respondent's objections and scheduled the matter for hearing on the application for condonation of delay on 22.04.2024.

15
Stage 1426/02/2024

Delay condonation

The Tribunal issued fresh notice to the respondent due to the appellant's failure to serve the soft copy of the notice and record via email, scheduling the next hearing for 01.04.2024.

16
Stage 1513/02/2024

Delay condonation

The Tribunal granted the appellant a one-week extension to file an affidavit of service, imposing a cost of Rs. 500/- to be used for the legal representatives' library, and scheduled the matter for hearing on 26.02.2024.

17
Stage 1609/01/2024

Delay condonation

The Tribunal provisionally accepted a deposit of Rs. 2,41,663/- towards Section 43(5) compliance, granted the appellant one week to file a corrected CA certificate, and issued notice to the respondent regarding the application for condonation of delay.

18
Stage 17Final Ruling Order

Tribunal Order #0901126018942023-16-04-2025

The U.P. Real Estate Appellate Tribunal rejected the appellant's application for condonation of delay and dismissed the appeal, ruling that the failure of the legal representative to inform the promoter did not constitute sufficient cause to excuse the delay.

19
Stage 18Interim Order

Tribunal Order #0901126018942023-02-01-2025

The Tribunal directed the parties to submit a chart detailing delays in the completion and handing over of possession of the respective units and scheduled the matter for hearing on 24.01.2025.

20
Stage 19Interim Order

Tribunal Order #0901126018942023-13-02-2024

The Tribunal granted the appellant a one-week extension to file an affidavit of service, imposing a cost of Rs. 500/- to be used for the legal representatives' library, and scheduled the matter for hearing on 26.02.2024.

21
Stage 20Interim Order

Tribunal Order #0901126018942023-09-01-2024

The Tribunal provisionally accepted a deposit of Rs. 2,41,663/- towards Section 43(5) compliance, granted the appellant one week to file a corrected CA certificate, and issued notice to the respondent regarding the application for condonation of delay.

Disposal Phase

Tribunal Disposal & Final Award Ruling

The U.P. Real Estate Appellate Tribunal rejected the appellant's application for condonation of delay and dismissed the appeal, ruling that the failure of the legal representative to inform the promoter did not constitute sufficient cause to excuse the delay. Awarded in favor of Respondent.

Disposal Winner: RespondentStatus: Completed

Final Tribunal Order & Ruling Verdict Summary

Official Ruling Summary

The U.P. Real Estate Appellate Tribunal rejected the appellant's application for condonation of delay and dismissed the appeal, ruling that the failure of the legal representative to inform the promoter did not constitute sufficient cause to excuse the delay.

Ruling Awarded To

Respondent

Verified Tribunal DocumentationDownload Official Final Tribunal Order PDF

Appearing Legal Counsel & Advocates

Appellant Advocate(s)

  • Nilaya Gupta

Respondent Advocate(s)

  • M.P. Sahai

Official RERA Tribunal Orders (4)

FINAL_ORDEROrder ID: 0901126018942023-16-04-2025

The U.P. Real Estate Appellate Tribunal rejected the appellant's application for condonation of delay and dismissed the appeal, ruling that the failure of the legal representative to inform the promoter did not constitute sufficient cause to excuse the delay.

INTERIM_ORDEROrder ID: 0901126018942023-02-01-2025

The Tribunal directed the parties to submit a chart detailing delays in the completion and handing over of possession of the respective units and scheduled the matter for hearing on 24.01.2025.

INTERIM_ORDEROrder ID: 0901126018942023-13-02-2024

The Tribunal granted the appellant a one-week extension to file an affidavit of service, imposing a cost of Rs. 500/- to be used for the legal representatives' library, and scheduled the matter for hearing on 26.02.2024.

INTERIM_ORDEROrder ID: 0901126018942023-09-01-2024

The Tribunal provisionally accepted a deposit of Rs. 2,41,663/- towards Section 43(5) compliance, granted the appellant one week to file a corrected CA certificate, and issued notice to the respondent regarding the application for condonation of delay.

TathyaGrid RERA Intelligence AI

Need to research all rulings for himalaya realestate pvt ltd?

Extract builder dossiers, check execution status, and draft RERA appeal petitions in minutes using TathyaGrid.

Open AI Workspace →