up_reraStatus: Completed
CASE ID: 0901126018932023

Appellant / Complainant

Himalaya Realestate Pvt Ltd

VS

Respondent

Lakshay Gupta

Developer Firm

himalaya realestate pvt ltd

Disposal Award

Respondent

TathyaGrid Legal Copilot: Automated procedural intelligence extracted from official RERA tribunal records.
Analyze in Workspace

Case Procedural History & Progression Tree

Visual step-by-step tree detailing dispute origin, interim hearings, and final tribunal ruling.

22 Milestones
Filing Phase

Complaint Filing & Dispute Registration

Complaint registered under Case ID 0901126018932023 by Himalaya Realestate Pvt Ltd against Lakshay Gupta before up_rera.

2
Stage 116/04/2025

Delay condonation

The U.P. Real Estate Appellate Tribunal rejected the appellant's application for condonation of delay and dismissed the appeal, ruling that the failure of the appellant's legal representative to inform them of the order did not constitute sufficient cause to excuse the delay.

3
Stage 219/03/2025

Delay condonation

The Tribunal granted a request by the appellant's counsel to list the defective appeal for consideration of the condonation of delay application on 16.04.2025.

4
Stage 318/02/2025

Delay condonation

The Tribunal has scheduled the defective appeal for hearing on the application for condonation of delay on 19.03.2025, noting that no further adjournments will be granted.

5
Stage 424/01/2025

Delay condonation

The Tribunal has granted a request from the parties to list the appeal for hearing before the regular Bench on 18.02.2025.

6
Stage 502/01/2025

For Order

The Tribunal granted the respondent one week to file objections to the appellant's interim relief application and directed both parties to submit a chart detailing delays in the completion and handing over of possession of the respective units.

7
Stage 605/11/2024

Delay condonation

No text available.

8
Stage 723/09/2024

Delay condonation

The Tribunal noted the respondent's statement that they are not pressing for the execution of any R.C. issued against the appellant and adjourned the appeal to 05.11.2024 at the request of the parties.

9
Stage 820/08/2024

Delay condonation

The Tribunal refers the parties to a previously passed order dated in Appeal No. D 446/2023 for the current orders.

10
Stage 926/07/2024

Delay condonation

The Tribunal granted the appellant one week to file a rejoinder to the respondent's objections and scheduled the next hearing for August 20, 2024.

11
Stage 1029/05/2024

Delay condonation

This is a procedural order referring the parties to a previous order passed in Appeal No. D 446/2023.

12
Stage 1123/05/2024

Delay condonation

The Tribunal noted the absence of both parties and ordered the defective appeal to be listed on 29.05.2024 for consideration of the application for condonation of delay.

13
Stage 1222/04/2024

Delay condonation

The Tribunal granted an adjournment requested by the respondent's counsel due to illness and rescheduled the appeal for hearing on 23.05.2024.

14
Stage 1301/04/2024

Delay condonation

The Tribunal granted the appellant 10 days to file a reply to the respondent's objections and scheduled the matter for hearing on the application for condonation of delay on 22.04.2024.

15
Stage 1426/02/2024

Delay condonation

The Tribunal issued fresh notice to the respondent due to the applicant's failure to serve the soft copy of the record via email, and scheduled the matter for hearing on 01.04.2024.

16
Stage 1513/02/2024

Delay condonation

The Tribunal granted the appellant a one-week extension to file an affidavit of service, subject to a cost of Rs. 500/- to be used for the legal library, and scheduled the hearing for February 26, 2024.

17
Stage 1609/01/2024

Delay condonation

The Tribunal directed the appellant to file a fresh CA certificate regarding compliance with Section 43(5) of the Act and issued notice to the respondent for the hearing on 13.02.2024 to consider the application for condonation of delay.

18
Stage 17Final Ruling Order

Tribunal Order #0901126018932023-16-04-2025

The U.P. Real Estate Appellate Tribunal rejected the appellant's application for condonation of delay and dismissed the appeal, ruling that the failure of the appellant's legal representative to inform them of the order did not constitute sufficient cause to excuse the delay.

19
Stage 18Interim Order

Tribunal Order #0901126018932023-09-01-2024

The Tribunal directed the appellant to file a fresh CA certificate regarding compliance with Section 43(5) of the Act and issued notice to the respondent for the hearing on 13.02.2024 to consider the application for condonation of delay.

20
Stage 19Interim Order

Tribunal Order #0901126018932023-02-01-2025

The Tribunal granted the respondent one week to file objections to the appellant's interim relief application and directed both parties to submit a chart detailing delays in the completion and handing over of possession of the respective units.

21
Stage 20Interim Order

Tribunal Order #0901126018932023-13-02-2024

The Tribunal granted the appellant a one-week extension to file an affidavit of service, subject to a cost of Rs. 500/- to be used for the legal library, and scheduled the hearing for February 26, 2024.

Disposal Phase

Tribunal Disposal & Final Award Ruling

The U.P. Real Estate Appellate Tribunal rejected the appellant's application for condonation of delay and dismissed the appeal, ruling that the failure of the appellant's legal representative to inform them of the order did not constitute sufficient cause to excuse the delay. Awarded in favor of Respondent.

Disposal Winner: RespondentStatus: Completed

Final Tribunal Order & Ruling Verdict Summary

Official Ruling Summary

The U.P. Real Estate Appellate Tribunal rejected the appellant's application for condonation of delay and dismissed the appeal, ruling that the failure of the appellant's legal representative to inform them of the order did not constitute sufficient cause to excuse the delay.

Ruling Awarded To

Respondent

Verified Tribunal DocumentationDownload Official Final Tribunal Order PDF

Appearing Legal Counsel & Advocates

Appellant Advocate(s)

  • Nilaya Gupta

Respondent Advocate(s)

  • M.P. Sahai

Official RERA Tribunal Orders (4)

FINAL_ORDEROrder ID: 0901126018932023-16-04-2025

The U.P. Real Estate Appellate Tribunal rejected the appellant's application for condonation of delay and dismissed the appeal, ruling that the failure of the appellant's legal representative to inform them of the order did not constitute sufficient cause to excuse the delay.

INTERIM_ORDEROrder ID: 0901126018932023-09-01-2024

The Tribunal directed the appellant to file a fresh CA certificate regarding compliance with Section 43(5) of the Act and issued notice to the respondent for the hearing on 13.02.2024 to consider the application for condonation of delay.

INTERIM_ORDEROrder ID: 0901126018932023-02-01-2025

The Tribunal granted the respondent one week to file objections to the appellant's interim relief application and directed both parties to submit a chart detailing delays in the completion and handing over of possession of the respective units.

INTERIM_ORDEROrder ID: 0901126018932023-13-02-2024

The Tribunal granted the appellant a one-week extension to file an affidavit of service, subject to a cost of Rs. 500/- to be used for the legal library, and scheduled the hearing for February 26, 2024.

TathyaGrid RERA Intelligence AI

Need to research all rulings for himalaya realestate pvt ltd?

Extract builder dossiers, check execution status, and draft RERA appeal petitions in minutes using TathyaGrid.

Open AI Workspace →