up_reraStatus: Completed
CASE ID: 0901126018192021

Appellant / Complainant

Anjali Srivastava

VS

Respondent

R.Sons Infraland Developers Pvt. Ltd

Developer Firm

r.sons infraland developers pvt. ltd

Disposal Award

Respondent

TathyaGrid Legal Copilot: Automated procedural intelligence extracted from official RERA tribunal records.
Analyze in Workspace

Legal Issues & Claims Raised

Jurisdiction & Maintainability

Case Procedural History & Progression Tree

Visual step-by-step tree detailing dispute origin, interim hearings, and final tribunal ruling.

19 Milestones
Filing Phase

Complaint Filing & Dispute Registration

Complaint registered under Case ID 0901126018192021 by Anjali Srivastava against R.Sons Infraland Developers Pvt. Ltd before up_rera.

Jurisdiction & Maintainability
2
Stage 116/08/2022

Hearing

The Tribunal dismissed the appeal because the respondent's project was not registered with UPRERA, rendering both the original complaint and the subsequent appeal non-maintainable under the RERA Act 2016.

3
Stage 205/07/2022

Hearing

The Tribunal directed the appellant to publish a notice in the Amar Ujala or Aaj newspapers due to the respondent's untraceable address and scheduled the matter for further orders on 16.08.2022.

4
Stage 327/04/2022

Hearing

The Tribunal noted that the respondent was not duly served with notice and directed the issuance of a 'Dasti' notice to be completed within one week, adjourning the matter to 05.07.2022.

5
Stage 416/03/2022

Hearing

The Tribunal directed the appellant to file an affidavit of service regarding a previous order and scheduled the case for further orders on 27.04.2022.

6
Stage 503/02/2022

Hearing

No text available.

7
Stage 610/01/2022

Hearing

The Tribunal issued a notice to the respondent and directed the appellant to serve the notice and appeal documents via speed post, with the matter listed for further orders on 03.02.2022.

8
Stage 713/12/2021

Hearing

The Tribunal granted the appellant a final ten-day extension to file documents as previously ordered and scheduled the next hearing for January 10, 2022.

9
Stage 826/11/2021

Hearing

No text available.

10
Stage 909/11/2021

Hearing

The Tribunal granted the appellant's counsel 10 days to submit evidence regarding whether the respondent's project falls within the Barabanki planning area and scheduled the next hearing for 26.11.2021.

11
Stage 1002/11/2021

Hearing

The Tribunal granted a request for adjournment made by the appellant's counsel and scheduled the appeal for a hearing on maintainability on 09.11.2021.

12
Stage 1101/10/2021

Hearing on Appeal

The Tribunal granted an adjournment requested by the appellant's counsel due to personal difficulties and rescheduled the hearing for November 2, 2021.

13
Stage 1220/09/2021

Hearing on Appeal

Upon the request of the appellant's counsel, the tribunal has ordered the appeal to be listed for a hearing on 01.10.2021.

14
Stage 1323/04/2021

Admission

No text available.

15
Stage 1408/04/2021

Admission

No text available.

16
Stage 1525/03/2021

Admission

The Tribunal granted the appellant's counsel one week to prepare their brief regarding the maintainability of the appeal and adjourned the matter to 08.04.2021.

17
Stage 1615/03/2021

Hearing on Appeal

The Tribunal adjourned the appeal for admission to 25.03.2021 because the counsel for the appellant was not prepared with her brief.

18
Stage 17Final Ruling Order

Tribunal Order #0901126018192021-16-08-2022

The Tribunal dismissed the appeal because the respondent's project was not registered with UPRERA, rendering both the original complaint and the subsequent appeal non-maintainable under the RERA Act 2016.

Disposal Phase

Tribunal Disposal & Final Award Ruling

The Tribunal dismissed the appeal because the respondent's project was not registered with UPRERA, rendering both the original complaint and the subsequent appeal non-maintainable under the RERA Act 2016. Awarded in favor of Respondent.

Disposal Winner: RespondentStatus: Completed

Final Tribunal Order & Ruling Verdict Summary

Official Ruling Summary

The Tribunal dismissed the appeal because the respondent's project was not registered with UPRERA, rendering both the original complaint and the subsequent appeal non-maintainable under the RERA Act 2016.

Ruling Awarded To

Respondent

Verified Tribunal DocumentationDownload Official Final Tribunal Order PDF

Statutory Sections Cited (RERA Act 2016)

Section 3Section 79

Appearing Legal Counsel & Advocates

Appellant Advocate(s)

  • Abhishek Khare
  • Aahuti Agarwal

Official RERA Tribunal Orders (1)

FINAL_ORDEROrder ID: 0901126018192021-16-08-2022

The Tribunal dismissed the appeal because the respondent's project was not registered with UPRERA, rendering both the original complaint and the subsequent appeal non-maintainable under the RERA Act 2016.

TathyaGrid RERA Intelligence AI

Need to research all rulings for r.sons infraland developers pvt. ltd?

Extract builder dossiers, check execution status, and draft RERA appeal petitions in minutes using TathyaGrid.

Open AI Workspace →