Appellant / Complainant
Anuradha Gupta, Shubham Gupta
Respondent
Ajnara Realtech Ltd.
ajnara realtech ltd.
Appellant
Legal Issues & Claims Raised
Case Procedural History & Progression Tree
Visual step-by-step tree detailing dispute origin, interim hearings, and final tribunal ruling.
Complaint Filing & Dispute Registration
Complaint registered under Case ID 0901126018152020 by Anuradha Gupta, Shubham Gupta against Ajnara Realtech Ltd. before up_rera.
Further Order
The Appellate Tribunal remands the case back to the Regulatory Authority for a fresh decision on merits within 90 days, after finding that the previous common order was perverse because it failed to distinguish between different prayers for refund and interest.
Further Order
The Tribunal granted the respondent liberty to file written arguments and supporting judgments before the next hearing date, which is scheduled for July 6, 2022.
Further Order
The Tribunal directed the parties to file and exchange concise written submissions within 20 days and scheduled the next hearing for May 16, 2022.
Further Order
The Tribunal granted an adjournment requested by the respondent's counsel and rescheduled the appeal for hearing on 11.04.2022.
Tribunal Order #0901126018152020-06-07-2022
The Appellate Tribunal remands the case back to the Regulatory Authority for a fresh decision on merits within 90 days, after finding that the previous common order was perverse because it failed to distinguish between different prayers for refund and interest.
Tribunal Disposal & Final Award Ruling
The Appellate Tribunal remands the case back to the Regulatory Authority for a fresh decision on merits within 90 days, after finding that the previous common order was perverse because it failed to distinguish between different prayers for refund and interest. Awarded in favor of Appellant.
Final Tribunal Order & Ruling Verdict Summary
Official Ruling Summary
The Appellate Tribunal remands the case back to the Regulatory Authority for a fresh decision on merits within 90 days, after finding that the previous common order was perverse because it failed to distinguish between different prayers for refund and interest.
Ruling Awarded To
Appellant
Statutory Sections Cited (RERA Act 2016)
Appearing Legal Counsel & Advocates
Appellant Advocate(s)
- Dheeraj Gupta
Respondent Advocate(s)
- Siddharth Nandwani
Official RERA Tribunal Orders (1)
The Appellate Tribunal remands the case back to the Regulatory Authority for a fresh decision on merits within 90 days, after finding that the previous common order was perverse because it failed to distinguish between different prayers for refund and interest.
Need to research all rulings for ajnara realtech ltd.?
Extract builder dossiers, check execution status, and draft RERA appeal petitions in minutes using TathyaGrid.