Appellant / Complainant
Meerut Development Authority
Respondent
Sanjeev Gupta
Appellant
Case Procedural History & Progression Tree
Visual step-by-step tree detailing dispute origin, interim hearings, and final tribunal ruling.
Complaint Filing & Dispute Registration
Complaint registered under Case ID 0901126018072020 by Meerut Development Authority against Sanjeev Gupta before up_rera.
Further Order
The Tribunal set aside the impugned order because it was based on a non-existent compromise agreement and remanded the case back to the Regulatory Authority for a fresh decision on merits.
Further Order
The Tribunal adjourned the matter due to the absence of the applicant and scheduled the case for further orders on 05.01.2022.
Delay condonation
The Tribunal issued a reminder to the Regulatory Authority to submit the lower court records and the conciliation report, adjourning the matter to 30.11.2021.
Delay condonation
The Tribunal has ordered the summoning of the record for Complaint No. 9201817277 and the conciliator's report from RERA to investigate conflicting claims regarding a purported compromise.
Hearing on Recall App
The Tribunal allowed the applicant's application to recall the order dated 20.11.2020 due to a clerical error in the diary, restoring the case to its original number and setting a timeline for filing objections.
Hearing on Recall App
The Tribunal granted the appellant three days to file an affidavit of service regarding the recall of the order dated 20.11.2020 and scheduled the next hearing for 18.03.2021.
Tribunal Order #0901126018072020-05-01-2022
The Tribunal set aside the impugned order because it was based on a non-existent compromise agreement and remanded the case back to the Regulatory Authority for a fresh decision on merits.
Tribunal Order #0901126018072020-29-09-2021
The Tribunal has ordered the summoning of the record for Complaint No. 9201817277 and the conciliator's report from RERA to investigate conflicting claims regarding a purported compromise.
Tribunal Disposal & Final Award Ruling
The Tribunal set aside the impugned order because it was based on a non-existent compromise agreement and remanded the case back to the Regulatory Authority for a fresh decision on merits. Awarded in favor of Appellant.
Final Tribunal Order & Ruling Verdict Summary
Official Ruling Summary
The Tribunal set aside the impugned order because it was based on a non-existent compromise agreement and remanded the case back to the Regulatory Authority for a fresh decision on merits.
Ruling Awarded To
Appellant
Statutory Sections Cited (RERA Act 2016)
Appearing Legal Counsel & Advocates
Appellant Advocate(s)
- Puneet Sahai Bisaria
Respondent Advocate(s)
- Abhijat Pratap Singh
Official RERA Tribunal Orders (2)
The Tribunal set aside the impugned order because it was based on a non-existent compromise agreement and remanded the case back to the Regulatory Authority for a fresh decision on merits.
The Tribunal has ordered the summoning of the record for Complaint No. 9201817277 and the conciliator's report from RERA to investigate conflicting claims regarding a purported compromise.
Need to research all rulings for a builder?
Extract builder dossiers, check execution status, and draft RERA appeal petitions in minutes using TathyaGrid.