up_reraStatus: Completed
CASE ID: 0901126018052025

Appellant / Complainant

Reeti Rastogi, Shrey Rastogi

VS

Respondent

Abhisht Developers & Builders Pvt. Ltd., Arun Prakash Pandey

Developer Firm

abhisht developers & builders pvt. ltd.

Disputed Amount

18,24,480

Disposal Award

Appellant

TathyaGrid Legal Copilot: Automated procedural intelligence extracted from official RERA tribunal records.
Analyze in Workspace

Legal Issues & Claims Raised

Delay in PossessionDelay Compensation / InterestSale Deed & Title TransferNon-Compliance & Execution

Case Procedural History & Progression Tree

Visual step-by-step tree detailing dispute origin, interim hearings, and final tribunal ruling.

15 Milestones
Filing Phase

Complaint Filing & Dispute Registration

Complaint registered under Case ID 0901126018052025 by Reeti Rastogi, Shrey Rastogi against Abhisht Developers & Builders Pvt. Ltd., Arun Prakash Pandey before up_rera.

Delay in PossessionDelay Compensation / InterestSale Deed & Title TransferNon-Compliance & Execution
2
Stage 112/05/2026

for delivery of Judgment/Order

The Tribunal set aside the Adjudicating Officer's order that deemed possession impossible due to third-party sale deeds, ruling instead that under the doctrine of lis pendens, the developer must proceed with the execution of sale deeds and delivery of possession to the original allottees.

3
Stage 201/05/2026

for delivery of Judgment/Order

No text available.

4
Stage 307/01/2026

Hearing

The Tribunal heard arguments from both parties regarding the appeal and has reserved its judgment for a later date.

5
Stage 403/12/2025

Admission

The court granted an adjournment requested by the respondent's counsel due to them being out of station and rescheduled the hearing for January 7, 2026.

6
Stage 507/11/2025

Delay condonation

The Tribunal granted the appellant 10 days to file a rejoinder and scheduled the next hearing for December 3, 2025.

7
Stage 614/10/2025

Admission

The Tribunal granted the respondent a final 10-day extension to file objections and directed parties to exchange pleadings before the next hearing scheduled for November 7, 2025.

8
Stage 715/09/2025

Admission

The Tribunal granted the respondent ten days to file objections and scheduled the appeal for hearing on 14.10.2025.

9
Stage 826/08/2025

Admission

The Tribunal granted the respondent 10 days to file objections and vakalatnama, with a directive for the appellant to file a rejoinder within one week thereafter. The matter is scheduled for hearing on 15.09.2025.

10
Stage 906/08/2025

Admission

The Tribunal adjourned the matter to 26.08.2025 and granted respondent numbers 1, 2, and 3 permission to file objections in the interim.

11
Stage 1016/07/2025

Admission

The Tribunal noted sufficient service of notice upon the respondents via post and email, granted the respondent 10 days to file objections, and scheduled the matter for hearing on 06.08.2025.

12
Stage 1127/05/2025

Admission

The Tribunal issued notice to the respondent and directed that any transfer of the subject unit by the respondent shall be subject to the final outcome of the appeal.

13
Stage 12Final Ruling Order

Tribunal Order #0901126018052025-12-05-2026

The Tribunal set aside the Adjudicating Officer's order that deemed possession impossible due to third-party sale deeds, ruling instead that under the doctrine of lis pendens, the developer must proceed with the execution of sale deeds and delivery of possession to the original allottees.

14
Stage 13Interim Order

Tribunal Order #0901126018052025-27-05-2025

The Tribunal issued notice to the respondent and directed that any transfer of the subject unit by the respondent shall be subject to the final outcome of the appeal.

Disposal Phase

Tribunal Disposal & Final Award Ruling

The Tribunal set aside the Adjudicating Officer's order that deemed possession impossible due to third-party sale deeds, ruling instead that under the doctrine of lis pendens, the developer must proceed with the execution of sale deeds and delivery of possession to the original allottees. Awarded in favor of Appellant. Awarded interest rate: SBI MCLR + 1%.

Disposal Winner: AppellantInterest Rate: SBI MCLR + 1%Status: Completed

Final Tribunal Order & Ruling Verdict Summary

Official Ruling Summary

The Tribunal set aside the Adjudicating Officer's order that deemed possession impossible due to third-party sale deeds, ruling instead that under the doctrine of lis pendens, the developer must proceed with the execution of sale deeds and delivery of possession to the original allottees.

Ruling Awarded To

Appellant

Awarded Interest Rate

SBI MCLR + 1%

Interest Period

from February 2015 till the actual delivery of possession

Verified Tribunal DocumentationDownload Official Final Tribunal Order PDF

Statutory Sections Cited (RERA Act 2016)

Section 18(1)Section 11(4)(f)Section 17Section 40Section 63Section 64

Appearing Legal Counsel & Advocates

Appellant Advocate(s)

  • Ashok Sinha

Respondent Advocate(s)

  • Amit Yadav

Official RERA Tribunal Orders (2)

FINAL_ORDEROrder ID: 0901126018052025-12-05-2026

The Tribunal set aside the Adjudicating Officer's order that deemed possession impossible due to third-party sale deeds, ruling instead that under the doctrine of lis pendens, the developer must proceed with the execution of sale deeds and delivery of possession to the original allottees.

INTERIM_ORDEROrder ID: 0901126018052025-27-05-2025

The Tribunal issued notice to the respondent and directed that any transfer of the subject unit by the respondent shall be subject to the final outcome of the appeal.

TathyaGrid RERA Intelligence AI

Need to research all rulings for abhisht developers & builders pvt. ltd.?

Extract builder dossiers, check execution status, and draft RERA appeal petitions in minutes using TathyaGrid.

Open AI Workspace →