up_reraStatus: Completed
CASE ID: 0901126017822020

Appellant / Complainant

Rakesh Kumar Sood

VS

Respondent

Eldeco Housing & Industries Ltd.

Developer Firm

eldeco housing & industries ltd.

Disputed Amount

34,59,170

Disposal Award

Respondent

TathyaGrid Legal Copilot: Automated procedural intelligence extracted from official RERA tribunal records.
Analyze in Workspace

Legal Issues & Claims Raised

Delay in PossessionDelay Compensation / InterestStructural Defects & QualityMaintenance & Utility Disputes

Case Procedural History & Progression Tree

Visual step-by-step tree detailing dispute origin, interim hearings, and final tribunal ruling.

18 Milestones
Filing Phase

Complaint Filing & Dispute Registration

Complaint registered under Case ID 0901126017822020 by Rakesh Kumar Sood against Eldeco Housing & Industries Ltd. before up_rera.

Delay in PossessionDelay Compensation / InterestStructural Defects & QualityMaintenance & Utility Disputes
2
Stage 115/09/2023

for delivery of Judgment/Order

The Tribunal dismissed the appeal filed by the appellants, upholding the Adjudicating Officer's decision to reject their claim for compensation of Rs. 60,000 due to a lack of documentary evidence proving expenditure on seepage repairs.

3
Stage 224/08/2023

Hearing

The Tribunal has heard the arguments from both parties and has reserved the judgment for a later date.

4
Stage 306/07/2023

Hearing

The Tribunal allowed the substitution application to replace the deceased appellant no. 1 with their legal heirs and directed the filing of an amended memo of appeal.

5
Stage 429/05/2023

Hearing

The Tribunal granted an adjournment requested by the respondent's counsel due to illness and rescheduled the case for hearing/orders on 06.07.2023.

6
Stage 522/05/2023

Hearing

The Tribunal has scheduled the case for May 29, 2023, to hear arguments regarding an application for substitution of parties.

7
Stage 602/05/2023

Re-Hearing

The Tribunal noted the death of Appellant No. 1 and directed the filing of a substitution application for his legal heirs, scheduling the hearing on the substitution application for May 22, 2023.

8
Stage 721/03/2023

Re-Hearing

No text available.

9
Stage 810/02/2023

Re-Hearing

No text available.

10
Stage 906/01/2023

Re-Hearing

No text available.

11
Stage 1006/12/2022

Re-Hearing

No text available.

12
Stage 1117/11/2022

Re-Hearing

The Tribunal noted the death of appellant Rakesh Kumar Sood and directed the respondent to file an objection to the substitution application, scheduling the matter for December 6, 2022.

13
Stage 1202/11/2022

Re-Hearing

The Tribunal directed the appellant to file a substitution application to replace the deceased appellant, Rakesh Kumar Sood, with his legal heirs.

14
Stage 1318/03/2021

Arguments

The Tribunal heard arguments from both the appellant and respondent and subsequently reserved the judgment for future pronouncement.

15
Stage 1425/01/2021

Notice

The Tribunal directed the parties to file a list of dates, events, and relied-upon judgments on the portal and in physical copy within 15 days, and scheduled the matter for hearing on 18.03.2021.

16
Stage 1508/12/2020

Notice

No text available.

17
Stage 16Final Ruling Order

Tribunal Order #0901126017822020-15-09-2023

The Tribunal dismissed the appeal filed by the appellants, upholding the Adjudicating Officer's decision to reject their claim for compensation of Rs. 60,000 due to a lack of documentary evidence proving expenditure on seepage repairs.

Disposal Phase

Tribunal Disposal & Final Award Ruling

The Tribunal dismissed the appeal filed by the appellants, upholding the Adjudicating Officer's decision to reject their claim for compensation of Rs. 60,000 due to a lack of documentary evidence proving expenditure on seepage repairs. Awarded in favor of Respondent.

Disposal Winner: RespondentStatus: Completed

Final Tribunal Order & Ruling Verdict Summary

Official Ruling Summary

The Tribunal dismissed the appeal filed by the appellants, upholding the Adjudicating Officer's decision to reject their claim for compensation of Rs. 60,000 due to a lack of documentary evidence proving expenditure on seepage repairs.

Ruling Awarded To

Respondent

Verified Tribunal DocumentationDownload Official Final Tribunal Order PDF

Statutory Sections Cited (RERA Act 2016)

Section 18(1)Section 14(3)Section 11(4)(d)Section 19(6)

Appearing Legal Counsel & Advocates

Appellant Advocate(s)

  • Awadhesh Kumar Misra
  • Manoj Kumar Srivastava

Respondent Advocate(s)

  • Vinay Lakhani

Official RERA Tribunal Orders (1)

FINAL_ORDEROrder ID: 0901126017822020-15-09-2023

The Tribunal dismissed the appeal filed by the appellants, upholding the Adjudicating Officer's decision to reject their claim for compensation of Rs. 60,000 due to a lack of documentary evidence proving expenditure on seepage repairs.

TathyaGrid RERA Intelligence AI

Need to research all rulings for eldeco housing & industries ltd.?

Extract builder dossiers, check execution status, and draft RERA appeal petitions in minutes using TathyaGrid.

Open AI Workspace →