up_reraStatus: Active
CASE ID: 0901126017782024

Appellant / Complainant

Singh Brothers

VS

Respondent

Uttar Pradesh Real Estate Regulatory Authority Lucknow, Collage Group Infrastructure Pvt. Ltd., Lalit Kumar Singh

Developer Firm

collage group infrastructure pvt. ltd.

Disputed Amount

80,12,481

Disposal Award

Respondent

TathyaGrid Legal Copilot: Automated procedural intelligence extracted from official RERA tribunal records.
Analyze in Workspace

Legal Issues & Claims Raised

Delay in PossessionRefund of InvestmentDelay Compensation / InterestNon-Compliance & ExecutionJurisdiction & Maintainability

Case Procedural History & Progression Tree

Visual step-by-step tree detailing dispute origin, interim hearings, and final tribunal ruling.

13 Milestones
Filing Phase

Complaint Filing & Dispute Registration

Complaint registered under Case ID 0901126017782024 by Singh Brothers against Uttar Pradesh Real Estate Regulatory Authority Lucknow, Collage Group Infrastructure Pvt. Ltd., Lalit Kumar Singh before up_rera.

Delay in PossessionRefund of InvestmentDelay Compensation / InterestNon-Compliance & ExecutionJurisdiction & Maintainability
2
Stage 118/07/2024

Delay condonation

No text available.

3
Stage 212/06/2024

for delivery of Judgment/Order

The Appellate Tribunal dismissed the appeal filed by M/s Singh Brothers, ruling that they qualify as 'promoters' under Section 2(zk) of the RERA Act and are therefore liable for the recovery certificate issued to satisfy a refund order.

4
Stage 331/05/2024

Defect Removal

The Tribunal has heard the arguments from both the appellant and respondent parties and has reserved the judgment for further delivery.

5
Stage 430/05/2024

Defect Removal

The Tribunal granted an urgency request from the appellant's counsel and rescheduled the matter for hearing on 31.05.2024.

6
Stage 517/05/2024

Defect Removal

No text available.

7
Stage 614/05/2024

Defect Removal

The Tribunal granted the respondent three days to file objections, warning that failure to comply may result in summoning the Secretary of U.P. RERA to appear in person with records.

8
Stage 729/04/2024

Defect Removal

No text available.

9
Stage 822/04/2024

Defect Removal

The Tribunal issued notice to the Respondent regarding the legality of amending a recovery certificate to include the applicant's name for a project in which they claim no promoter/developer liability. The matter is scheduled for hearing on 29.04.2024 to examine compliance with Section 43(5) of the RERA Act.

10
Stage 9Interim Order

Tribunal Order #0901126017782024-14-05-2024

The Tribunal granted the respondent three days to file objections, warning that failure to comply may result in summoning the Secretary of U.P. RERA to appear in person with records.

11
Stage 10Final Ruling Order

Tribunal Order #0901126017782024-12-06-2024

The Appellate Tribunal dismissed the appeal filed by M/s Singh Brothers, ruling that they qualify as 'promoters' under Section 2(zk) of the RERA Act and are therefore liable for the recovery certificate issued to satisfy a refund order.

12
Stage 11Interim Order

Tribunal Order #0901126017782024-22-04-2024

The Tribunal issued notice to the Respondent regarding the legality of amending a recovery certificate to include the applicant's name for a project in which they claim no promoter/developer liability. The matter is scheduled for hearing on 29.04.2024 to examine compliance with Section 43(5) of the RERA Act.

Disposal Phase

Tribunal Disposal & Final Award Ruling

The Appellate Tribunal dismissed the appeal filed by M/s Singh Brothers, ruling that they qualify as 'promoters' under Section 2(zk) of the RERA Act and are therefore liable for the recovery certificate issued to satisfy a refund order. Awarded in favor of Respondent. Awarded interest rate: MCLR+1% of SBI.

Disposal Winner: RespondentInterest Rate: MCLR+1% of SBIStatus: Active

Final Tribunal Order & Ruling Verdict Summary

Official Ruling Summary

The Appellate Tribunal dismissed the appeal filed by M/s Singh Brothers, ruling that they qualify as 'promoters' under Section 2(zk) of the RERA Act and are therefore liable for the recovery certificate issued to satisfy a refund order.

Ruling Awarded To

Respondent

Awarded Interest Rate

MCLR+1% of SBI

Interest Period

from the date payment of first premium till the date of last payment

Verified Tribunal DocumentationDownload Official Final Tribunal Order PDF

Statutory Sections Cited (RERA Act 2016)

Section 18(1)Section 40Section 63Section 64Section 43(5)Section 3Section 79

Appearing Legal Counsel & Advocates

Appellant Advocate(s)

  • Prashant Kumar
  • Fuhar Gupta

Respondent Advocate(s)

  • Sireesh Kumar
  • Sudhanshu Chauhan

Official RERA Tribunal Orders (3)

INTERIM_ORDEROrder ID: 0901126017782024-14-05-2024

The Tribunal granted the respondent three days to file objections, warning that failure to comply may result in summoning the Secretary of U.P. RERA to appear in person with records.

FINAL_ORDEROrder ID: 0901126017782024-12-06-2024

The Appellate Tribunal dismissed the appeal filed by M/s Singh Brothers, ruling that they qualify as 'promoters' under Section 2(zk) of the RERA Act and are therefore liable for the recovery certificate issued to satisfy a refund order.

INTERIM_ORDEROrder ID: 0901126017782024-22-04-2024

The Tribunal issued notice to the Respondent regarding the legality of amending a recovery certificate to include the applicant's name for a project in which they claim no promoter/developer liability. The matter is scheduled for hearing on 29.04.2024 to examine compliance with Section 43(5) of the RERA Act.

TathyaGrid RERA Intelligence AI

Need to research all rulings for collage group infrastructure pvt. ltd.?

Extract builder dossiers, check execution status, and draft RERA appeal petitions in minutes using TathyaGrid.

Open AI Workspace →