up_reraStatus: Completed
CASE ID: 0901126017752020

Appellant / Complainant

Greater Noida Industrial Development Authority

VS

Respondent

Rajiv Goel

Disposal Award

Respondent

TathyaGrid Legal Copilot: Automated procedural intelligence extracted from official RERA tribunal records.
Analyze in Workspace

Case Procedural History & Progression Tree

Visual step-by-step tree detailing dispute origin, interim hearings, and final tribunal ruling.

25 Milestones
Filing Phase

Complaint Filing & Dispute Registration

Complaint registered under Case ID 0901126017752020 by Greater Noida Industrial Development Authority against Rajiv Goel before up_rera.

2
Stage 108/09/2022

for delivery of Judgment/Order

The appeal was dismissed by reference to a previous order passed in Appeal No. 104/2020.

3
Stage 218/08/2022

Hearing

The Tribunal heard arguments regarding the legality of a RERA order that mandated a refund with interest if possession was not provided by a specific deadline, though no final judgment was delivered as the decision was reserved.

4
Stage 311/08/2022

Hearing

The Tribunal granted an adjournment requested by the appellant's counsel due to a family medical emergency and scheduled the appeal for hearing on 18.08.2022.

5
Stage 404/08/2022

Hearing

The Tribunal granted a request from both parties to adjourn the appeal and rescheduled the matter for hearing on 11.08.2022.

6
Stage 526/07/2022

Hearing

The Tribunal noted the absence of the appellant's counsel due to sanctioned leave and scheduled the appeal for hearing on 04.08.2022.

7
Stage 606/07/2022

Hearing

The Tribunal adjourned the proceedings due to a request from the respondent's counsel and granted the respondent 10 days to file objections to the appeal.

8
Stage 728/04/2022

Hearing

The Tribunal adjourned the appeal to 06.07.2022 and granted the appellant permission to file a replication/rejoinder to the respondent's reply.

9
Stage 823/03/2022

Hearing

The Tribunal granted the respondent a final opportunity to file a reply against the grounds of appeal and directed them to serve a copy to the appellant via email before the next hearing on 28.04.2022.

10
Stage 924/02/2022

Delay condonation

The Tribunal condoned the delay in filing the appeal by citing the Supreme Court's Suo Motu Writ Petition (Civil) No. 3 of 2020 regarding COVID-19 pandemic delays and directed the Registry to convert the defective appeal into a regular appeal.

11
Stage 1013/01/2022

Delay condonation

No text available.

12
Stage 1120/12/2021

Delay condonation

No text available.

13
Stage 1225/11/2021

Delay condonation

The Tribunal granted an adjournment requested by the appellant's counsel and scheduled the matter for 20.12.2021 to dispose of the limitation application and its objection.

14
Stage 1302/11/2021

Delay condonation

No text available.

15
Stage 1420/10/2021

Delay condonation

The Tribunal adjourned the proceedings due to a lawyers' strike following the murder of a counsel in Shahjahanpur and rescheduled the case for 02.11.2021 to dispose of the condonation application.

16
Stage 1519/10/2021

Delay condonation

No text available.

17
Stage 1615/09/2021

Delay condonation

The Tribunal granted the respondent two weeks to file objections to the application for condonation of delay and the grounds of appeal, with the next hearing scheduled for 19.10.2021.

18
Stage 1730/04/2021

Delay condonation

No text available.

19
Stage 1807/04/2021

Delay condonation

No text available.

20
Stage 1910/03/2021

For Order

The Tribunal granted the appellant 10 days to file a reply to the respondent's objections and directed the Registry to correct the counsel's name in the records. The matter is scheduled for consideration of the condonation of delay application on 07.04.2021.

21
Stage 2017/02/2021

Notice

The Tribunal granted the appellant 10 days to file a reply to the respondent's objections and scheduled the matter for March 10, 2021, to consider the application for condonation of delay.

22
Stage 2126/08/2020

Notice

No text available.

23
Stage 22Interim Order

Tribunal Order #0901126017752020-18-08-2022

The Tribunal heard arguments regarding the legality of a RERA order that mandated a refund with interest if possession was not provided by a specific deadline, though no final judgment was delivered as the decision was reserved.

24
Stage 23Interim Order

Tribunal Order #0901126017752020-24-02-2022

The Tribunal condoned the delay in filing the appeal by citing the Supreme Court's Suo Motu Writ Petition (Civil) No. 3 of 2020 regarding COVID-19 pandemic delays and directed the Registry to convert the defective appeal into a regular appeal.

Disposal Phase

Tribunal Disposal & Final Award Ruling

Dismissed Awarded in favor of Respondent.

Disposal Winner: RespondentStatus: Completed

Final Tribunal Order & Ruling Verdict Summary

Official Ruling Summary

Dismissed

Ruling Awarded To

Respondent

Verified Tribunal DocumentationDownload Official Final Tribunal Order PDF

Appearing Legal Counsel & Advocates

Appellant Advocate(s)

  • Rajesh Chadha

Respondent Advocate(s)

  • Shakti Vikram Srivastava

Official RERA Tribunal Orders (2)

INTERIM_ORDEROrder ID: 0901126017752020-18-08-2022

The Tribunal heard arguments regarding the legality of a RERA order that mandated a refund with interest if possession was not provided by a specific deadline, though no final judgment was delivered as the decision was reserved.

INTERIM_ORDEROrder ID: 0901126017752020-24-02-2022

The Tribunal condoned the delay in filing the appeal by citing the Supreme Court's Suo Motu Writ Petition (Civil) No. 3 of 2020 regarding COVID-19 pandemic delays and directed the Registry to convert the defective appeal into a regular appeal.

TathyaGrid RERA Intelligence AI

Need to research all rulings for a builder?

Extract builder dossiers, check execution status, and draft RERA appeal petitions in minutes using TathyaGrid.

Open AI Workspace →