up_reraStatus: Completed
CASE ID: 0901126017282022

Appellant / Complainant

K. N. Gupta

VS

Respondent

Suncity Hi-Tech Infrastructure Pvt. Ltd

Developer Firm

suncity hi-tech infrastructure pvt. ltd

Disposal Award

Respondent

TathyaGrid Legal Copilot: Automated procedural intelligence extracted from official RERA tribunal records.
Analyze in Workspace

Legal Issues & Claims Raised

Jurisdiction & Maintainability

Case Procedural History & Progression Tree

Visual step-by-step tree detailing dispute origin, interim hearings, and final tribunal ruling.

21 Milestones
Filing Phase

Complaint Filing & Dispute Registration

Complaint registered under Case ID 0901126017282022 by K. N. Gupta against Suncity Hi-Tech Infrastructure Pvt. Ltd before up_rera.

Jurisdiction & Maintainability
2
Stage 107/05/2024

for delivery of Judgment/Order

The Tribunal rejected the review application filed by K.N. Gupta, upholding the previous decision that he does not qualify as an 'allottee' or 'consumer' under the RERA Act because no allotment had been made to him.

3
Stage 223/04/2024

For Order

The Tribunal heard arguments from the counsels for both parties regarding the Review Application and reserved its judgment.

4
Stage 322/04/2024

For Order

The Tribunal adjourned the hearing of I.A. No. 1067/2022 to 23.04.2024 due to the absence of the appellant's counsel and noted that the matter will proceed ex-parte if no one appears on the next date.

5
Stage 416/04/2024

For Order

The Tribunal granted an adjournment due to the applicant's personal difficulty and allowed three days for the applicant to file a reply to the respondent's objections, rescheduling the review application for 22.04.2024.

6
Stage 512/04/2024

For Order

No text available.

7
Stage 609/04/2024

For Order

The Tribunal granted the respondent three days to file objections and scheduled the matter for hearing on April 12, 2024.

8
Stage 701/04/2024

For Order

The Tribunal directed the applicant to provide a soft copy of the review application to the respondent and established a timeline for filing objections and replies before listing the matter on 09.04.2024.

9
Stage 828/03/2024

For Order

The Tribunal adjourned the hearing of IA-1067/2022 to 01.04.2024 because the applicant's counsel was reported to be ill.

10
Stage 919/03/2024

For Order

The Tribunal adjourned the application IA-1067/2022 to 28.03.2024 and permitted the applicant to intimate the respondent regarding the next hearing date.

11
Stage 1023/11/2022

For Order

No text available.

12
Stage 1118/10/2022

For Order

The Tribunal condoned the delay in filing the review petition based on Supreme Court guidelines and permitted a change of counsel, subsequently issuing notice to the respondent for a hearing on 23.11.2022.

13
Stage 1229/09/2022

For Order

No text available.

14
Stage 1301/09/2022

For Order

The Tribunal adjourned the review application (IA-1067/2022) to 29.09.2022 due to the absence of the applicant and directed the Registry to constitute the Bench at 1 PM.

15
Stage 1405/08/2022

For Order

No text available.

16
Stage 1512/07/2022

For Order

The Tribunal granted a request for adjournment to allow the review petitioner to file an affidavit and rescheduled the matter for August 5, 2022.

17
Stage 1623/05/2022

For Order

The Tribunal noted a change in counsel for the appellant and directed that the matter be listed on 12.07.2022 to address procedural defects.

18
Stage 1706/05/2022

Hearing

The Tribunal directed that the case be listed before the concerned bench after seeking nomination from the Chairman, with the date to be communicated by the Registry.

19
Stage 18Final Ruling Order

Tribunal Order #0901126017282022-07-05-2024

The Tribunal rejected the review application filed by K.N. Gupta, upholding the previous decision that he does not qualify as an 'allottee' or 'consumer' under the RERA Act because no allotment had been made to him.

20
Stage 19Interim Order

Tribunal Order #0901126017282022-18-10-2022

The Tribunal condoned the delay in filing the review petition based on Supreme Court guidelines and permitted a change of counsel, subsequently issuing notice to the respondent for a hearing on 23.11.2022.

Disposal Phase

Tribunal Disposal & Final Award Ruling

The Tribunal rejected the review application filed by K.N. Gupta, upholding the previous decision that he does not qualify as an 'allottee' or 'consumer' under the RERA Act because no allotment had been made to him. Awarded in favor of Respondent.

Disposal Winner: RespondentStatus: Completed

Final Tribunal Order & Ruling Verdict Summary

Official Ruling Summary

The Tribunal rejected the review application filed by K.N. Gupta, upholding the previous decision that he does not qualify as an 'allottee' or 'consumer' under the RERA Act because no allotment had been made to him.

Ruling Awarded To

Respondent

Verified Tribunal DocumentationDownload Official Final Tribunal Order PDF

Statutory Sections Cited (RERA Act 2016)

Section 3Section 79

Appearing Legal Counsel & Advocates

Respondent Advocate(s)

  • Dilip Singh

Official RERA Tribunal Orders (2)

FINAL_ORDEROrder ID: 0901126017282022-07-05-2024

The Tribunal rejected the review application filed by K.N. Gupta, upholding the previous decision that he does not qualify as an 'allottee' or 'consumer' under the RERA Act because no allotment had been made to him.

INTERIM_ORDEROrder ID: 0901126017282022-18-10-2022

The Tribunal condoned the delay in filing the review petition based on Supreme Court guidelines and permitted a change of counsel, subsequently issuing notice to the respondent for a hearing on 23.11.2022.

TathyaGrid RERA Intelligence AI

Need to research all rulings for suncity hi-tech infrastructure pvt. ltd?

Extract builder dossiers, check execution status, and draft RERA appeal petitions in minutes using TathyaGrid.

Open AI Workspace →