Appellant / Complainant
Neelima Khanna
Respondent
Supertech Realtors Pvt. Ltd.
supertech realtors pvt. ltd.
₹1,24,57,840
Appellant
Legal Issues & Claims Raised
Case Procedural History & Progression Tree
Visual step-by-step tree detailing dispute origin, interim hearings, and final tribunal ruling.
Complaint Filing & Dispute Registration
Complaint registered under Case ID 0901126016662020 by Neelima Khanna against Supertech Realtors Pvt. Ltd. before up_rera.
for delivery of Judgment/Order
The Appellate Tribunal set aside the UPRERA order that had directed the allottee to pay dues and take possession, ruling that because the promoter had previously cancelled the allotment, the relationship between the parties had ceased and the complaint was not maintainable.
Hearing
The court heard arguments from both parties and reserved the judgment for a later date.
Hearing
The Tribunal granted a request to list the matter for orders on the following day, 27.02.2024.
Hearing
The Tribunal granted an adjournment requested by the respondent due to counsel being out of station, but scheduled the next hearing for 26.02.2024 with a strict directive that no further adjournments will be permitted.
Hearing
The Tribunal granted an adjournment requested by the appellant's counsel due to traffic delays and rescheduled the hearing for consideration of the delay condonation application to 11-07-2023.
Hearing
The Tribunal adjourned the proceedings due to the absence of the appellant's counsel and scheduled the appeal for a hearing on 05.07.2023.
Hearing
The Tribunal granted an adjournment requested by the respondent's counsel and rescheduled the hearing for April 26, 2023.
Hearing
The Tribunal granted a request for adjournment submitted by the appellant's counsel and rescheduled the hearing for February 8, 2023.
Hearing
The Tribunal granted a mutual request for adjournment from both parties and scheduled the appeal for hearing on 09.01.2023 following the exchange of pleadings.
Hearing
The Tribunal denied a request for adjournment due to medical exigency and directed the parties to proceed with arguments on the next hearing date, scheduled for 07.12.2022.
Hearing
The Tribunal granted the parties 10 days to attempt an amicable settlement, directing them to report the outcome at the next hearing on 11.11.2022.
Hearing
The Tribunal granted the parties three days to prepare their briefs and adjourned the matter for a hearing on 19.10.2022.
Hearing
The Tribunal noted the absence of the respondent's counsel due to sanctioned leave and scheduled the appeal for a hearing on 11.10.2022.
Hearing
The Tribunal granted the appellant's counsel one week to prepare her brief and scheduled the next hearing for 12.09.2022.
Hearing
The Tribunal has scheduled the appeal for a hearing on 22.08.2022.
Hearing
The Tribunal noted that pleadings have been exchanged and scheduled the appeal for a hearing on 05.08.2022.
Hearing
The Tribunal directed the parties to file concise written arguments along with relied-upon judgments and scheduled the next hearing for July 21, 2022.
Hearing
The Tribunal adjourned the appeal due to the absence of the respondent and scheduled the matter for a hearing on 17.05.2022.
For Order
The Tribunal noted that pleadings have been exchanged and the respondent declined to file an additional reply; consequently, the matter is scheduled for final hearing on 12.04.2022.
Further Order
The Tribunal granted the appellant one week to file a reply to the respondent's objections and directed that the reply be served via email and uploaded to the e-portal.
Delay condonation
The Tribunal condoned the delay in filing the appeal due to the COVID-19 pandemic relaxation and directed the Registry to convert the miscellaneous case into a regular appeal. The Respondent's counsel was further directed to file an additional reply.
Further Order
The Tribunal granted an adjournment requested by the respondent's counsel and scheduled the matter for 16.12.2021 to address the limitation application and objections.
Delay condonation
The Tribunal noted that the parties are likely to settle the matter out of court and adjourned the case to 23.11.2021 for further orders.
Delay condonation
The court granted an adjournment requested by the respondent's counsel due to a bereavement in the family and rescheduled the matter for 27.10.2021.
Delay condonation
The Tribunal granted an adjournment request from the respondent's counsel due to COVID-19 quarantine and rescheduled the case for hearing on 13.04.2021.
For Order
The case is adjourned because lawyers are abstaining from work due to a call by the Oudh Bar Association; the matter is rescheduled for 23.03.2021.
For Order
The Tribunal has adjourned the matter for two weeks to allow the parties an opportunity to reach an amicable settlement, with the next hearing scheduled for 02.03.2021.
For Order
The Tribunal corrected the names of counsel in the cause list and adjourned the matter to 11.02.2021 to allow parties to pursue an amicable settlement.
Tribunal Order #0901126016662020-07-05-2024
The Appellate Tribunal set aside the UPRERA order that had directed the allottee to pay dues and take possession, ruling that because the promoter had previously cancelled the allotment, the relationship between the parties had ceased and the complaint was not maintainable.
Tribunal Order #0901126016662020-16-12-2021
The Tribunal condoned the delay in filing the appeal due to the COVID-19 pandemic relaxation and directed the Registry to convert the miscellaneous case into a regular appeal. The Respondent's counsel was further directed to file an additional reply.
Tribunal Disposal & Final Award Ruling
The Appellate Tribunal set aside the UPRERA order that had directed the allottee to pay dues and take possession, ruling that because the promoter had previously cancelled the allotment, the relationship between the parties had ceased and the complaint was not maintainable. Awarded in favor of Appellant. Awarded interest rate: MCLR+1%.
Final Tribunal Order & Ruling Verdict Summary
Official Ruling Summary
The Appellate Tribunal set aside the UPRERA order that had directed the allottee to pay dues and take possession, ruling that because the promoter had previously cancelled the allotment, the relationship between the parties had ceased and the complaint was not maintainable.
Ruling Awarded To
Appellant
Awarded Interest Rate
MCLR+1%
Statutory Sections Cited (RERA Act 2016)
Appearing Legal Counsel & Advocates
Appellant Advocate(s)
- Anoop Kumar
- Fuhar Gupta
- Sushil Kumar
Respondent Advocate(s)
- Harish Pandey
- N A
Official RERA Tribunal Orders (2)
The Appellate Tribunal set aside the UPRERA order that had directed the allottee to pay dues and take possession, ruling that because the promoter had previously cancelled the allotment, the relationship between the parties had ceased and the complaint was not maintainable.
The Tribunal condoned the delay in filing the appeal due to the COVID-19 pandemic relaxation and directed the Registry to convert the miscellaneous case into a regular appeal. The Respondent's counsel was further directed to file an additional reply.
Need to research all rulings for supertech realtors pvt. ltd.?
Extract builder dossiers, check execution status, and draft RERA appeal petitions in minutes using TathyaGrid.