up_reraStatus: Completed
CASE ID: 0901126016462022

Appellant / Complainant

Devraj Tokas

VS

Respondent

Gaursons Hi-tech Infrastructure Pvt. Ltd.

Developer Firm

gaursons hi-tech infrastructure pvt. ltd.

Disposal Award

Respondent

TathyaGrid Legal Copilot: Automated procedural intelligence extracted from official RERA tribunal records.
Analyze in Workspace

Case Procedural History & Progression Tree

Visual step-by-step tree detailing dispute origin, interim hearings, and final tribunal ruling.

34 Milestones
Filing Phase

Complaint Filing & Dispute Registration

Complaint registered under Case ID 0901126016462022 by Devraj Tokas against Gaursons Hi-tech Infrastructure Pvt. Ltd. before up_rera.

2
Stage 113/08/2025

Hearing

The appeal was dismissed as not pressed following a submission that the parties have reached an amicable out-of-court settlement.

3
Stage 222/07/2025

Hearing

The Tribunal granted a joint request from the counsel to adjourn the appeal to 13.08.2025 and directed the parties to exchange pleadings in the interim.

4
Stage 302/07/2025

Hearing

The tribunal has adjourned the appeal to 22.07.2025 following a joint request from the counsel for both the appellant and the respondent.

5
Stage 427/05/2025

Hearing

The Tribunal granted an adjournment requested by the respondent's counsel due to illness and rescheduled the hearing for July 2, 2025, with a directive that no further adjournments will be permitted.

6
Stage 502/05/2025

Hearing

The Tribunal has adjourned the appeal to 27.05.2025 following a joint request from the counsels for both parties.

7
Stage 605/12/2024

Hearing

The U.P. Real Estate Appellate Tribunal dismissed the appeal filed by Devraj Tokas due to the appellant's failure to appear and lack of prosecution.

8
Stage 706/11/2024

Hearing

The Tribunal granted an adjournment requested by the appellant's counsel and rescheduled the hearing for December 5, 2024.

9
Stage 826/09/2024

Hearing

The Tribunal noted that amicable settlement processes are underway between the parties and adjourned the matter to 06.11.2024 to allow the respondent to seek further instructions.

10
Stage 923/08/2024

Hearing

Upon a joint request from both parties, the Tribunal has adjourned the appeal and scheduled it for orders/hearing on 26.09.2024.

11
Stage 1018/07/2024

Hearing

Upon the joint request of the counsels for both parties, the appeal has been adjourned and listed for orders/hearing on 23.08.2024.

12
Stage 1117/05/2024

Hearing

No text available.

13
Stage 1207/05/2024

Hearing

The Tribunal granted a request for urgency and scheduled the appeal for orders or hearing on 17.05.2024.

14
Stage 1304/04/2024

Hearing

The Tribunal granted an adjournment requested by the respondent's counsel due to his absence from the station and rescheduled the hearing for May 7, 2024.

15
Stage 1429/02/2024

Hearing

The Tribunal granted an adjournment requested by the appellant's counsel on health grounds and rescheduled the hearing for April 4, 2024.

16
Stage 1502/02/2024

Hearing

The Tribunal granted the appellant 10 days to file the online complaint and clarify whether any amendments were sought in the original prayer or grounds.

17
Stage 1603/11/2023

Hearing

No text available.

18
Stage 1721/09/2023

Hearing

The Tribunal has scheduled the appeal for orders/hearing on November 3, 2023.

19
Stage 1808/08/2023

Hearing

The Tribunal listed the appeal for a hearing on 21.09.2023 and referred to a previous order passed in a related appeal.

20
Stage 1926/05/2023

Hearing

No text available.

21
Stage 2025/04/2023

Hearing

The Tribunal granted an adjournment requested by the appellant's counsel due to an accident and rescheduled the hearing for 26.05.2023.

22
Stage 2127/03/2023

Hearing

The Tribunal scheduled the case for orders/hearing on 25.04.2023 and directed reference to a previous order passed in Appeal No. 354/2022.

23
Stage 2228/02/2023

Hearing

No text available.

24
Stage 2327/01/2023

Hearing

No text available.

25
Stage 2420/12/2022

For Order

The Tribunal granted an adjournment requested by the appellant's counsel due to personal difficulty and rescheduled the hearing for 27.01.2023.

26
Stage 2524/11/2022

Delay condonation

The Tribunal adjourned the matter to 20.12.2022 for the consideration of an application for condonation of delay, following a joint request from the counsels of both parties.

27
Stage 2607/11/2022

to file objections and its reply

The Tribunal listed the defective appeal for 24.11.2022 to consider an application for condonation of delay and for hearing.

28
Stage 2728/09/2022

to file objections and its reply

The Tribunal has scheduled the matter for a subsequent hearing on 07.11.2022.

29
Stage 2809/09/2022

to file objections and its reply

No text available.

30
Stage 2924/08/2022

to file objections and its reply

The Tribunal directed the respondent to file objections to the condonation of delay and grounds of appeal within 10 days, with the appellant to reply within a week thereafter, and scheduled the hearing for 09.09.2022.

31
Stage 3028/07/2022

to file objections and its reply

No text available.

32
Stage 3104/07/2022

Defect Removal

The Tribunal granted the applicant 10 days to file a certified copy of the impugned order and issued notice to the respondent regarding the application for condonation of delay, scheduling the matter for 28.07.2022.

33
Stage 32Final Ruling Order

Tribunal Order #0901126016462022-05-12-2024

The U.P. Real Estate Appellate Tribunal dismissed the appeal filed by Devraj Tokas due to the appellant's failure to appear and lack of prosecution.

Disposal Phase

Tribunal Disposal & Final Award Ruling

The U.P. Real Estate Appellate Tribunal dismissed the appeal filed by Devraj Tokas due to the appellant's failure to appear and lack of prosecution. Awarded in favor of Respondent.

Disposal Winner: RespondentStatus: Completed

Final Tribunal Order & Ruling Verdict Summary

Official Ruling Summary

The U.P. Real Estate Appellate Tribunal dismissed the appeal filed by Devraj Tokas due to the appellant's failure to appear and lack of prosecution.

Ruling Awarded To

Respondent

Verified Tribunal DocumentationDownload Official Final Tribunal Order PDF

Appearing Legal Counsel & Advocates

Appellant Advocate(s)

  • Praveen K Sharma

Respondent Advocate(s)

  • Samrat Vaish
  • Mohit Yadav

Official RERA Tribunal Orders (1)

FINAL_ORDEROrder ID: 0901126016462022-05-12-2024

The U.P. Real Estate Appellate Tribunal dismissed the appeal filed by Devraj Tokas due to the appellant's failure to appear and lack of prosecution.

TathyaGrid RERA Intelligence AI

Need to research all rulings for gaursons hi-tech infrastructure pvt. ltd.?

Extract builder dossiers, check execution status, and draft RERA appeal petitions in minutes using TathyaGrid.

Open AI Workspace →