up_reraStatus: Active
CASE ID: 0901126016242020

Appellant / Complainant

Ghaziabad Development Authority

VS

Respondent

Abhinav Kumar Verma

Disputed Amount

50,72,173

Disposal Award

Respondent

TathyaGrid Legal Copilot: Automated procedural intelligence extracted from official RERA tribunal records.
Analyze in Workspace

Legal Issues & Claims Raised

Refund of InvestmentDelay Compensation / InterestNon-Compliance & Execution

Case Procedural History & Progression Tree

Visual step-by-step tree detailing dispute origin, interim hearings, and final tribunal ruling.

19 Milestones
Filing Phase

Complaint Filing & Dispute Registration

Complaint registered under Case ID 0901126016242020 by Ghaziabad Development Authority against Abhinav Kumar Verma before up_rera.

Refund of InvestmentDelay Compensation / InterestNon-Compliance & Execution
2
Stage 118/05/2023

For Order

The Tribunal corrected a clerical error in the previous order dated 14.12.2022, replacing the incorrectly transcribed 'Lucknow Development Authority' with 'Ghaziabad Development Authority'.

3
Stage 214/12/2022

for delivery of Judgment/Order

The U.P. Real Estate Appellate Tribunal rejected the appellant's application for condonation of delay and dismissed the appeal due to lack of sufficient cause, while directing that the statutory pre-deposit be transferred to the Regulatory Authority for disposal.

4
Stage 308/12/2021

Further Order

The Tribunal reserved its judgment on the application for condonation of delay filed by the Ghaziabad Development Authority, allowing both parties to submit legal rulings on the point of limitation.

5
Stage 417/11/2021

Part Heard

No text available.

6
Stage 522/10/2021

Delay condonation

The Tribunal adjourned the matter to 17.11.2021 after both parties expressed their intent to file relevant case law regarding the points of argument.

7
Stage 628/09/2021

Delay condonation

The Tribunal granted the respondent three days to file a reply to the applicant's improved affidavit for condonation of delay and scheduled the matter for hearing on 22.10.2021.

8
Stage 708/09/2021

For Order

The Tribunal granted a final 10-day opportunity to the applicant to file a better affidavit for condonation of delay, failing which the right to do so will be closed.

9
Stage 826/04/2021

Delay condonation

No text available.

10
Stage 901/04/2021

Delay condonation

No text available.

11
Stage 1010/03/2021

Delay condonation

No text available.

12
Stage 1124/02/2021

For Order

The case is adjourned to 10.03.2021 because lawyers are abstaining from work due to a call by the Oudh Bar Association.

13
Stage 1205/02/2021

For Order

The Tribunal granted the applicant three days to file a reply to the respondent's objections and scheduled the matter for 24.02.2021 to consider the application for condonation of delay.

14
Stage 1325/01/2021

Delay condonation

The Tribunal granted an adjournment request and directed the applicant's counsel to email, upload, and file original copies of their reply to the respondent's objections before the next hearing on 05.02.2021.

15
Stage 1406/01/2021

Hearing

No text available.

16
Stage 1514/12/2020

Hearing

No text available.

17
Stage 16Interim Order

Tribunal Order #0901126016242020-08-12-2021

The Tribunal reserved its judgment on the application for condonation of delay filed by the Ghaziabad Development Authority, allowing both parties to submit legal rulings on the point of limitation.

18
Stage 17Final Ruling Order

Tribunal Order #0901126016242020-14-12-2022

The U.P. Real Estate Appellate Tribunal rejected the appellant's application for condonation of delay and dismissed the appeal due to lack of sufficient cause, while directing that the statutory pre-deposit be transferred to the Regulatory Authority for disposal.

Disposal Phase

Tribunal Disposal & Final Award Ruling

The U.P. Real Estate Appellate Tribunal rejected the appellant's application for condonation of delay and dismissed the appeal due to lack of sufficient cause, while directing that the statutory pre-deposit be transferred to the Regulatory Authority for disposal. Awarded in favor of Respondent.

Disposal Winner: RespondentStatus: Active

Final Tribunal Order & Ruling Verdict Summary

Official Ruling Summary

The U.P. Real Estate Appellate Tribunal rejected the appellant's application for condonation of delay and dismissed the appeal due to lack of sufficient cause, while directing that the statutory pre-deposit be transferred to the Regulatory Authority for disposal.

Ruling Awarded To

Respondent

Verified Tribunal DocumentationDownload Official Final Tribunal Order PDF

Statutory Sections Cited (RERA Act 2016)

Section 18(1)Section 40Section 63Section 64

Appearing Legal Counsel & Advocates

Appellant Advocate(s)

  • Ram Raj
  • Rishabh Raj

Respondent Advocate(s)

  • Savita Jain

Official RERA Tribunal Orders (2)

INTERIM_ORDEROrder ID: 0901126016242020-08-12-2021

The Tribunal reserved its judgment on the application for condonation of delay filed by the Ghaziabad Development Authority, allowing both parties to submit legal rulings on the point of limitation.

FINAL_ORDEROrder ID: 0901126016242020-14-12-2022

The U.P. Real Estate Appellate Tribunal rejected the appellant's application for condonation of delay and dismissed the appeal due to lack of sufficient cause, while directing that the statutory pre-deposit be transferred to the Regulatory Authority for disposal.

TathyaGrid RERA Intelligence AI

Need to research all rulings for a builder?

Extract builder dossiers, check execution status, and draft RERA appeal petitions in minutes using TathyaGrid.

Open AI Workspace →