up_reraStatus: Completed
CASE ID: 0901126015992020

Appellant / Complainant

Surjeet Singh

VS

Respondent

Shree Energy Development Pvt. Ltd.

Developer Firm

shree energy development pvt. ltd.

Disposal Award

Respondent

TathyaGrid Legal Copilot: Automated procedural intelligence extracted from official RERA tribunal records.
Analyze in Workspace

Legal Issues & Claims Raised

Jurisdiction & Maintainability

Case Procedural History & Progression Tree

Visual step-by-step tree detailing dispute origin, interim hearings, and final tribunal ruling.

17 Milestones
Filing Phase

Complaint Filing & Dispute Registration

Complaint registered under Case ID 0901126015992020 by Surjeet Singh against Shree Energy Development Pvt. Ltd. before up_rera.

Jurisdiction & Maintainability
2
Stage 101/08/2022

Final Hearing

The Tribunal dismissed the appeal because the respondent's project was unregistered and had already received a partial completion certificate, making it ineligible for RERA jurisdiction under the Supreme Court's ruling in M/S Newtech Promoters & Developers Pvt. Ltd. Vs. State of U.P.

3
Stage 227/07/2022

Hearing

The Tribunal noted the appellant's absence and directed the Registry to notify the appellant via email regarding the next listing date.

4
Stage 318/05/2022

Hearing

The Tribunal adjourned the appeal to 27.07.2021 because the respondent's counsel was on sanctioned leave.

5
Stage 412/04/2022

Hearing

The Tribunal adjourned the appeal due to the absence of the appellant and scheduled the matter for a hearing on 17.05.2022.

6
Stage 521/02/2022

Hearing

The Tribunal adjourned the appeal due to the medical emergency of the respondent's counsel and scheduled the next hearing for 12.04.2022.

7
Stage 611/01/2022

Hearing

No text available.

8
Stage 709/12/2021

Further Order

The Tribunal allowed the application for condonation of delay in filing the appeal, citing the COVID-19 pandemic period as grounds for relaxation, and directed the respondent to file a reply.

9
Stage 816/11/2021

Delay condonation

The Tribunal granted an adjournment application filed by the appellant's counsel and rescheduled the case to 09.12.2021 for the disposal of a limitation application.

10
Stage 918/03/2021

Delay condonation

The defective appeal filed by Sh. Surjeet Singh was dismissed for want of prosecution due to the non-appearance of the appellant or their counsel.

11
Stage 1026/02/2021

For Order

The case is adjourned to 18.03.2021 due to a lawyer strike by the Oudh Bar Association, with parties directed to exchange pleadings in the interim.

12
Stage 1129/01/2021

Hearing

No text available.

13
Stage 1207/01/2021

Hearing

No text available.

14
Stage 13Final Ruling Order

Tribunal Order #0901126015992020-01-08-2022

The Tribunal dismissed the appeal because the respondent's project was unregistered and had already received a partial completion certificate, making it ineligible for RERA jurisdiction under the Supreme Court's ruling in M/S Newtech Promoters & Developers Pvt. Ltd. Vs. State of U.P.

15
Stage 14Interim Order

Tribunal Order #0901126015992020-18-03-2021

The defective appeal filed by Sh. Surjeet Singh was dismissed for want of prosecution due to the non-appearance of the appellant or their counsel.

16
Stage 15Interim Order

Tribunal Order #0901126015992020-09-12-2021

The Tribunal allowed the application for condonation of delay in filing the appeal, citing the COVID-19 pandemic period as grounds for relaxation, and directed the respondent to file a reply.

Disposal Phase

Tribunal Disposal & Final Award Ruling

The Tribunal dismissed the appeal because the respondent's project was unregistered and had already received a partial completion certificate, making it ineligible for RERA jurisdiction under the Supreme Court's ruling in M/S Newtech Promoters & Developers Pvt. Ltd. Vs. State of U.P. Awarded in favor of Respondent.

Disposal Winner: RespondentStatus: Completed

Final Tribunal Order & Ruling Verdict Summary

Official Ruling Summary

The Tribunal dismissed the appeal because the respondent's project was unregistered and had already received a partial completion certificate, making it ineligible for RERA jurisdiction under the Supreme Court's ruling in M/S Newtech Promoters & Developers Pvt. Ltd. Vs. State of U.P.

Ruling Awarded To

Respondent

Verified Tribunal DocumentationDownload Official Final Tribunal Order PDF

Statutory Sections Cited (RERA Act 2016)

Section 3Section 79

Appearing Legal Counsel & Advocates

Appellant Advocate(s)

  • Shailender Singh

Respondent Advocate(s)

  • Azhar Ikram
  • Manish Singh

Official RERA Tribunal Orders (3)

FINAL_ORDEROrder ID: 0901126015992020-01-08-2022

The Tribunal dismissed the appeal because the respondent's project was unregistered and had already received a partial completion certificate, making it ineligible for RERA jurisdiction under the Supreme Court's ruling in M/S Newtech Promoters & Developers Pvt. Ltd. Vs. State of U.P.

INTERIM_ORDEROrder ID: 0901126015992020-18-03-2021

The defective appeal filed by Sh. Surjeet Singh was dismissed for want of prosecution due to the non-appearance of the appellant or their counsel.

INTERIM_ORDEROrder ID: 0901126015992020-09-12-2021

The Tribunal allowed the application for condonation of delay in filing the appeal, citing the COVID-19 pandemic period as grounds for relaxation, and directed the respondent to file a reply.

TathyaGrid RERA Intelligence AI

Need to research all rulings for shree energy development pvt. ltd.?

Extract builder dossiers, check execution status, and draft RERA appeal petitions in minutes using TathyaGrid.

Open AI Workspace →