Appellant / Complainant
Uppal Chadha Hi-Tech Developers Pvt. Ltd.
Respondent
Sunil Kumar Agarwal
uppal chadha hi-tech developers pvt. ltd.
Respondent
Case Procedural History & Progression Tree
Visual step-by-step tree detailing dispute origin, interim hearings, and final tribunal ruling.
Complaint Filing & Dispute Registration
Complaint registered under Case ID 0901126015892022 by Uppal Chadha Hi-Tech Developers Pvt. Ltd. against Sunil Kumar Agarwal before up_rera.
Delay condonation
The Tribunal rejected the appellant's application for condonation of a 933-day delay due to lack of sufficient cause and dismissed the appeal, while directing that the amount deposited by the promoter be released to the respondent-allottee or remitted to U.P. RERA for disbursement.
Delay condonation
The Tribunal granted an adjournment requested by the appellant's counsel and scheduled the case for orders on 23.04.2025.
Delay condonation
The Tribunal granted the respondent 10 days to file objections, with the appellant permitted to file a reply within one week thereafter, and scheduled the next hearing for 25.03.2025.
Delay condonation
The Tribunal has granted a request by the appellant's counsel to list the case for orders on 28.02.2025.
Delay condonation
The Tribunal issued notice to the respondent and provided procedural instructions for the service of the appeal and the application for condonation of delay, scheduling the next hearing for 04.02.2025.
Tribunal Order #0901126015892022-23-04-2025
The Tribunal rejected the appellant's application for condonation of a 933-day delay due to lack of sufficient cause and dismissed the appeal, while directing that the amount deposited by the promoter be released to the respondent-allottee or remitted to U.P. RERA for disbursement.
Tribunal Disposal & Final Award Ruling
The Tribunal rejected the appellant's application for condonation of a 933-day delay due to lack of sufficient cause and dismissed the appeal, while directing that the amount deposited by the promoter be released to the respondent-allottee or remitted to U.P. RERA for disbursement. Awarded in favor of Respondent.
Final Tribunal Order & Ruling Verdict Summary
Official Ruling Summary
The Tribunal rejected the appellant's application for condonation of a 933-day delay due to lack of sufficient cause and dismissed the appeal, while directing that the amount deposited by the promoter be released to the respondent-allottee or remitted to U.P. RERA for disbursement.
Ruling Awarded To
Respondent
Appearing Legal Counsel & Advocates
Appellant Advocate(s)
- Surangama Sharma
- Naveen Kumar Tiwari
Respondent Advocate(s)
- Mandeep Singh
Official RERA Tribunal Orders (1)
The Tribunal rejected the appellant's application for condonation of a 933-day delay due to lack of sufficient cause and dismissed the appeal, while directing that the amount deposited by the promoter be released to the respondent-allottee or remitted to U.P. RERA for disbursement.
Need to research all rulings for uppal chadha hi-tech developers pvt. ltd.?
Extract builder dossiers, check execution status, and draft RERA appeal petitions in minutes using TathyaGrid.