Appellant / Complainant
Greater Noida Industrial Development Authority
Respondent
Gunjan Sharma
Respondent
Case Procedural History & Progression Tree
Visual step-by-step tree detailing dispute origin, interim hearings, and final tribunal ruling.
Complaint Filing & Dispute Registration
Complaint registered under Case ID 0901126015732020 by Greater Noida Industrial Development Authority against Gunjan Sharma before up_rera.
Delay condonation
The Tribunal rejected the application for condonation of delay and dismissed the appeal, ruling that the applicant failed to show sufficient cause for the 357-day delay and could not benefit from the Supreme Court's Suo Motu extension as the limitation had already expired.
Delay condonation
The Tribunal adjourned the case to 25.11.2021 and directed the parties to exchange pleadings and file originals in the Registry prior to the next hearing.
Delay condonation
The Tribunal granted the appellant a 10-day extension to file a reply to the respondent's objection regarding the application for condonation of delay and the grounds of appeal.
Hearing
The Tribunal granted the appellant 10 days to file a reply to the respondent's objections and scheduled the next hearing for April 5, 2021.
Hearing
The Tribunal granted the appellant 10 days to file a reply to the respondent's objections and scheduled the matter for March 15, 2021, to consider the application for condonation of delay.
Tribunal Order #0901126015732020-20-12-2021
The Tribunal rejected the application for condonation of delay and dismissed the appeal, ruling that the applicant failed to show sufficient cause for the 357-day delay and could not benefit from the Supreme Court's Suo Motu extension as the limitation had already expired.
Tribunal Disposal & Final Award Ruling
The Tribunal rejected the application for condonation of delay and dismissed the appeal, ruling that the applicant failed to show sufficient cause for the 357-day delay and could not benefit from the Supreme Court's Suo Motu extension as the limitation had already expired. Awarded in favor of Respondent.
Final Tribunal Order & Ruling Verdict Summary
Official Ruling Summary
The Tribunal rejected the application for condonation of delay and dismissed the appeal, ruling that the applicant failed to show sufficient cause for the 357-day delay and could not benefit from the Supreme Court's Suo Motu extension as the limitation had already expired.
Ruling Awarded To
Respondent
Appearing Legal Counsel & Advocates
Appellant Advocate(s)
- Rajesh Chadha
Respondent Advocate(s)
- Anilesh Tewari
Official RERA Tribunal Orders (1)
The Tribunal rejected the application for condonation of delay and dismissed the appeal, ruling that the applicant failed to show sufficient cause for the 357-day delay and could not benefit from the Supreme Court's Suo Motu extension as the limitation had already expired.
Need to research all rulings for a builder?
Extract builder dossiers, check execution status, and draft RERA appeal petitions in minutes using TathyaGrid.