Appellant / Complainant
Greater Noida Industrial Development Authority
Respondent
Baldev Singh
Respondent
Case Procedural History & Progression Tree
Visual step-by-step tree detailing dispute origin, interim hearings, and final tribunal ruling.
Complaint Filing & Dispute Registration
Complaint registered under Case ID 0901126015722020 by Greater Noida Industrial Development Authority against Baldev Singh before up_rera.
for delivery of Judgment/Order
The U.P. Real Estate Appellate Tribunal dismissed Appeal-300/2020 by reference to the judgment passed in Appeal 303/2020.
Hearing
The Tribunal heard arguments from the appellant's counsel regarding Appeal-300/2020 and reserved the judgment for a later date.
Hearing
The Tribunal has ordered the appeal to be listed for a hearing on 05.04.2024.
Hearing
The Tribunal noted that the matter is proceeding ex-parte against the respondent and scheduled the appeal for a hearing on February 29, 2024.
Hearing
The Tribunal adjourned the proceedings at the request of the appellant's counsel to allow time for brief preparation and rescheduled the hearing for 24.07.2023.
Hearing
The Tribunal decided to proceed ex parte against the respondent, Baldev Singh, due to their failure to appear or file objections despite sufficient notice and electronic notifications. The matter is scheduled for an ex parte hearing on 04.07.2023.
Hearing
The Tribunal granted the respondent a final 10-day extension to file objections to the grounds of appeal and scheduled the matter for hearing on 26.04.2023.
Hearing
The Tribunal adjourned the proceedings due to the illness of the appellant's counsel and granted the respondent 10 days to file objections to the grounds of appeal.
Exchange of pleadings
The Tribunal granted an adjournment requested by the appellant's counsel due to illness and rescheduled the matter for hearing on 07.02.2023.
Exchange of pleadings
The Tribunal allowed the appellant's application to condone a 139-day delay in filing the appeal, citing Supreme Court precedent regarding Suo Moto Writ (C) No. 3 of 2020, and directed the respondent to file a reply.
Exchange of pleadings
The Tribunal directed the respondent to file objections to the application for condonation of delay and the grounds of appeal within 10 days, with a subsequent reply period for the applicant, and scheduled the matter for 02.12.2022.
Hearing
The Tribunal noted that notice was served via newspaper publication and directed the respondent to file objections to the delay condonation application and reply to the appeal grounds by 31.10.2022.
Notice
The Tribunal rejected the appellant's claim of effective service via newspaper publication because the wrong content was published and directed the applicant to publish a proper notice in 'Times of India' and 'Navbharat Times' after Registrar approval.
Hearing
The Tribunal noted that the respondent had not been served and directed that notice be published in local newspapers (Amar Ujala, Dainik Jagran, Hindustan Times, or Aaj) within one week, with the case listed for hearing on 25.08.2022.
Hearing
The Tribunal issued a fresh notice to the respondent and directed the appellant to serve the memo of appeal via speed post and email, including Dasti service, with the matter returnable on 08.07.2022.
Hearing
The Tribunal issued a notice to the respondent and directed the appellant to serve the notice and appeal documents via speed post, scheduling the next hearing for April 29, 2022, to address the limitation application.
Further Order
The Tribunal granted the applicant permission to serve notice to the respondent via dasti summons and directed the filing of an affidavit of service before the next hearing on 23.03.2022.
Notice
The Tribunal granted an adjournment application moved by the applicant's counsel and rescheduled the case for hearing on 12.01.2022.
Delay condonation
The Tribunal issued a notice to the respondent via registered post, e-mail, and Dasti, and scheduled the matter for further orders on 21.12.2021.
Delay condonation
The Tribunal granted an application for adjournment and rescheduled the case to 24.11.2021 for the disposal of a limitation application and objections.
Delay condonation
The Tribunal granted the applicant's counsel one week to prepare their brief and rescheduled the case hearing for 26.10.2021.
For Order
The tribunal adjourned the defective appeal due to an advocates' strike and directed the parties to exchange pleadings before the next hearing on 16.03.2021.
Hearing
The Tribunal directed the appellant to comply with previous orders regarding service of notice and instructed both parties to exchange copies of the application for condonation of delay and objections via email before the next hearing on 26.02.2021.
Tribunal Order #0901126015722020-02-12-2022
The Tribunal allowed the appellant's application to condone a 139-day delay in filing the appeal, citing Supreme Court precedent regarding Suo Moto Writ (C) No. 3 of 2020, and directed the respondent to file a reply.
Tribunal Order #0901126015722020-29-05-2024
The U.P. Real Estate Appellate Tribunal dismissed Appeal-300/2020 by reference to the judgment passed in Appeal 303/2020.
Tribunal Order #0901126015722020-26-04-2023
The Tribunal decided to proceed ex parte against the respondent, Baldev Singh, due to their failure to appear or file objections despite sufficient notice and electronic notifications. The matter is scheduled for an ex parte hearing on 04.07.2023.
Tribunal Disposal & Final Award Ruling
The U.P. Real Estate Appellate Tribunal dismissed Appeal-300/2020 by reference to the judgment passed in Appeal 303/2020. Awarded in favor of Respondent.
Final Tribunal Order & Ruling Verdict Summary
Official Ruling Summary
The U.P. Real Estate Appellate Tribunal dismissed Appeal-300/2020 by reference to the judgment passed in Appeal 303/2020.
Ruling Awarded To
Respondent
Appearing Legal Counsel & Advocates
Appellant Advocate(s)
- Ajay Kumar Gupta
- Rishindra Vikram Singh
Respondent Advocate(s)
- Respondent In-Person
Official RERA Tribunal Orders (3)
The Tribunal allowed the appellant's application to condone a 139-day delay in filing the appeal, citing Supreme Court precedent regarding Suo Moto Writ (C) No. 3 of 2020, and directed the respondent to file a reply.
The U.P. Real Estate Appellate Tribunal dismissed Appeal-300/2020 by reference to the judgment passed in Appeal 303/2020.
The Tribunal decided to proceed ex parte against the respondent, Baldev Singh, due to their failure to appear or file objections despite sufficient notice and electronic notifications. The matter is scheduled for an ex parte hearing on 04.07.2023.
Need to research all rulings for a builder?
Extract builder dossiers, check execution status, and draft RERA appeal petitions in minutes using TathyaGrid.