Appellant / Complainant
Uppal Chadha Hi-Tech Developers Pvt. Ltd.
Respondent
Mamta Sharma
uppal chadha hi-tech developers pvt. ltd.
Respondent
Case Procedural History & Progression Tree
Visual step-by-step tree detailing dispute origin, interim hearings, and final tribunal ruling.
Complaint Filing & Dispute Registration
Complaint registered under Case ID 0901126015552022 by Uppal Chadha Hi-Tech Developers Pvt. Ltd. against Mamta Sharma before up_rera.
Delay condonation
The Tribunal rejected the appellant's application for condonation of delay due to lack of sufficient cause and dismissed the appeal, while directing that the amount deposited by the promoter be released to the respondent-allottee following a report from U.P. RERA.
Delay condonation
The Tribunal granted an adjournment requested by the appellant's counsel and scheduled the case for orders on 23.04.2025, noting that no further adjournments will be permitted.
Delay condonation
The Tribunal granted the appellant time to file a rejoinder and scheduled the next hearing for March 25, 2025.
Delay condonation
The Tribunal has granted a request by the appellant's counsel to list the case for orders on 28.02.2025.
Delay condonation
The Tribunal issued a notice to the respondent and outlined the procedural requirements for the appellant to serve the appeal and application for condonation of delay.
Tribunal Order #0901126015552022-23-04-2025
The Tribunal rejected the appellant's application for condonation of delay due to lack of sufficient cause and dismissed the appeal, while directing that the amount deposited by the promoter be released to the respondent-allottee following a report from U.P. RERA.
Tribunal Disposal & Final Award Ruling
The Tribunal rejected the appellant's application for condonation of delay due to lack of sufficient cause and dismissed the appeal, while directing that the amount deposited by the promoter be released to the respondent-allottee following a report from U.P. RERA. Awarded in favor of Respondent.
Final Tribunal Order & Ruling Verdict Summary
Official Ruling Summary
The Tribunal rejected the appellant's application for condonation of delay due to lack of sufficient cause and dismissed the appeal, while directing that the amount deposited by the promoter be released to the respondent-allottee following a report from U.P. RERA.
Ruling Awarded To
Respondent
Appearing Legal Counsel & Advocates
Appellant Advocate(s)
- Bal Kishor Verma
- Amit Yadav
Respondent Advocate(s)
- Rajesh Kumar Misra
- Satish Chandra Mishra
Official RERA Tribunal Orders (1)
The Tribunal rejected the appellant's application for condonation of delay due to lack of sufficient cause and dismissed the appeal, while directing that the amount deposited by the promoter be released to the respondent-allottee following a report from U.P. RERA.
Need to research all rulings for uppal chadha hi-tech developers pvt. ltd.?
Extract builder dossiers, check execution status, and draft RERA appeal petitions in minutes using TathyaGrid.