Appellant / Complainant
Lucknow Development Authority
Respondent
Sunita Singh
Case Procedural History & Progression Tree
Visual step-by-step tree detailing dispute origin, interim hearings, and final tribunal ruling.
Complaint Filing & Dispute Registration
Complaint registered under Case ID 0901126015452021 by Lucknow Development Authority against Sunita Singh before up_rera.
for delivery of Judgment/Order
The U.P. Real Estate Appellate Tribunal rejected several appeals filed by the Lucknow Development Authority and ruled that allottees are entitled to interest/compensation for an excluded period (27.04.2013 to 26.10.2016) due to a lack of 'force majeure' justification.
Further Order
The Tribunal directed the conversion of a defective appeal into a regular appeal following the disposal of a limitation application and reserved the judgment to be delivered alongside Cross Appeal No. 849/2020.
Delay condonation
The Tribunal condoned a 39-day delay in filing the appeal, citing COVID-19 pandemic relaxations granted by the Supreme Court, and directed the Registry to convert the defective appeal into a regular appeal.
Delay condonation
The Tribunal noted that the respondent had not been duly served with notice and directed the appellant to issue notice via registered post and e-mail, scheduling the next hearing for 04.01.2022.
Compliance of section 43(5)
The Tribunal issued notice to the respondent regarding an application for condonation of delay and directed the parties to exchange pleadings via email and upload them to the e-portal before the next hearing on 29.11.2021.
Rest deposit Amount under 43(5) of the Act
The Tribunal granted a final one-week extension for the appellant to comply with Section 43(5) of the Act, imposing a cost of Rs. 5000/- and warning that failure to comply by the next hearing will result in dismissal.
Defect Removal
The Tribunal granted a one-week extension to the appellant to comply with Section 43(5) of the Act regarding the deposit of a Bank Draft and to rectify procedural defects.
Defect Removal
The Tribunal directed the Registry to submit an office report regarding the removal of defects and verification of the deposit made for compliance with Section 43(5) of the Act.
Defect Removal
The Tribunal granted the appellant one week to rectify registry defects and ensure compliance with Section 43(5) of the Act, failing which the appeal will be dismissed.
Tribunal Order #0901126015452021-04-01-2022
The Tribunal condoned a 39-day delay in filing the appeal, citing COVID-19 pandemic relaxations granted by the Supreme Court, and directed the Registry to convert the defective appeal into a regular appeal.
Tribunal Order #0901126015452021-30-12-2022
The U.P. Real Estate Appellate Tribunal rejected several appeals filed by the Lucknow Development Authority and ruled that allottees are entitled to interest/compensation for an excluded period (27.04.2013 to 26.10.2016) due to a lack of 'force majeure' justification.
Tribunal Order #0901126015452021-08-03-2022
The Tribunal directed the conversion of a defective appeal into a regular appeal following the disposal of a limitation application and reserved the judgment to be delivered alongside Cross Appeal No. 849/2020.
Tribunal Order #0901126015452021-18-10-2021
The Tribunal granted a final one-week extension for the appellant to comply with Section 43(5) of the Act, imposing a cost of Rs. 5000/- and warning that failure to comply by the next hearing will result in dismissal.
Tribunal Disposal & Final Award Ruling
The U.P. Real Estate Appellate Tribunal rejected several appeals filed by the Lucknow Development Authority and ruled that allottees are entitled to interest/compensation for an excluded period (27.04.2013 to 26.10.2016) due to a lack of 'force majeure' justification.
Final Tribunal Order & Ruling Verdict Summary
Official Ruling Summary
The U.P. Real Estate Appellate Tribunal rejected several appeals filed by the Lucknow Development Authority and ruled that allottees are entitled to interest/compensation for an excluded period (27.04.2013 to 26.10.2016) due to a lack of 'force majeure' justification.
Appearing Legal Counsel & Advocates
Appellant Advocate(s)
- Amit Yadav
Respondent Advocate(s)
- Hridesh Srivastava
Official RERA Tribunal Orders (4)
The Tribunal condoned a 39-day delay in filing the appeal, citing COVID-19 pandemic relaxations granted by the Supreme Court, and directed the Registry to convert the defective appeal into a regular appeal.
The U.P. Real Estate Appellate Tribunal rejected several appeals filed by the Lucknow Development Authority and ruled that allottees are entitled to interest/compensation for an excluded period (27.04.2013 to 26.10.2016) due to a lack of 'force majeure' justification.
The Tribunal directed the conversion of a defective appeal into a regular appeal following the disposal of a limitation application and reserved the judgment to be delivered alongside Cross Appeal No. 849/2020.
The Tribunal granted a final one-week extension for the appellant to comply with Section 43(5) of the Act, imposing a cost of Rs. 5000/- and warning that failure to comply by the next hearing will result in dismissal.
Need to research all rulings for a builder?
Extract builder dossiers, check execution status, and draft RERA appeal petitions in minutes using TathyaGrid.